RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      웹기반 PBL환경에서 공유지식 형성에 영향을 미치는 팀 학습활동 특성 규명 = Identifying Characteristics of Team Learning Behavior for Shared Knowledge Building in the Web-based PBL

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959478

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to search the ideas for design and applying of effective and efficient web-based PBL environment based on the identifying of team learning behavior factors and examining the comprehensive process of shared knowledge building that have impacts on learning outcomes. For this purpose, a course from a virtual campus of the university located in Seoul was chosen to collect and analyze the relating data. The underlying design of this course was based upon the PBL theories and practices. Five to six students were randomly assigned to form fourteen teams working in the web-based PBL for 6 weeks. During the web-based PBL process, characteristics of shared knowledge building of each team was observed with the collections of synchronized and asynchronized interaction messages. In order to identify team differences in the team learning behavior, the two higher performance groups and two lower performance groups were selected, and their learning behaviors were comparatively analyzed based on the team`s performance outcomes. The major finding this study are as follow. first, there have been the qualitative and quantitative differences in diversity, density and representational method of the discussed messages according to learning performance level. second, frequency of the team learning behavior and interaction for making social relationships strongly correlated with similarity of the shared team knowledge structures. In addition, the accuracy of shared team knowledge structures correlated with the learning behaviors, for example, generating and discussing ideas to achieving meaningful solutions in the problem solving process.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to search the ideas for design and applying of effective and efficient web-based PBL environment based on the identifying of team learning behavior factors and examining the comprehensive process of shared knowledge buildi...

      The purpose of this study is to search the ideas for design and applying of effective and efficient web-based PBL environment based on the identifying of team learning behavior factors and examining the comprehensive process of shared knowledge building that have impacts on learning outcomes. For this purpose, a course from a virtual campus of the university located in Seoul was chosen to collect and analyze the relating data. The underlying design of this course was based upon the PBL theories and practices. Five to six students were randomly assigned to form fourteen teams working in the web-based PBL for 6 weeks. During the web-based PBL process, characteristics of shared knowledge building of each team was observed with the collections of synchronized and asynchronized interaction messages. In order to identify team differences in the team learning behavior, the two higher performance groups and two lower performance groups were selected, and their learning behaviors were comparatively analyzed based on the team`s performance outcomes. The major finding this study are as follow. first, there have been the qualitative and quantitative differences in diversity, density and representational method of the discussed messages according to learning performance level. second, frequency of the team learning behavior and interaction for making social relationships strongly correlated with similarity of the shared team knowledge structures. In addition, the accuracy of shared team knowledge structures correlated with the learning behaviors, for example, generating and discussing ideas to achieving meaningful solutions in the problem solving process.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한정선, "협력적 지식창출 과정의 규명 : 활동이론을 통한 e-learning 설계안 작성 활동의 분석" 한국교육공학회 21 (21): 29-62, 2005

      2 Johnson, D. W., "협동학습을 위한 참여적 학습자" 아카데미프레스 2004

      3 박희진, "팀 구성원들의 교류기억과 팀 멘탈모델의 관계 - 팀 학습 행동의 매개를 중심으로" 한국산업및조직심리학회 22 (22): 597-623, 2009

      4 하동환, "집단의 구성방식에 따른 사진교육의 효과" 한국사진학회 14 (14): 58-71, 2006

      5 이영민, "이러닝 기반 팀 학습환경에서 팀인지와 팀 활동과정, 팀성과 간 상관관계 탐색" 한국컴퓨터교육학회 10 (10): 31-38, 2007

      6 장경원, "온라인 PBL에서 학습자들의 문제해결 활동 특성 분석" 한국교육정보미디어학회 12 (12): 33-63, 2006

      7 임인재, "심리측정의 원리" 학연사 2003

      8 정한호, "대학수준 팀 기반 학습에서 공유정신모형의 선행변인과 팀 성과" 한국교육공학회 27 (27): 37-73, 2011

      9 최정임, "대학수업에서의 문제중심학습 적용 사례연구:성찰일기를 통한 효과성 분석을 중심으로" 한국교육공학회 23 (23): 35-65, 2007

      10 김종백, "구성주의에 근거한 문제중심학습의 실천적 과제와 대안의 모색" 한국교육심리학회 18 (18): 59-74, 2004

      1 한정선, "협력적 지식창출 과정의 규명 : 활동이론을 통한 e-learning 설계안 작성 활동의 분석" 한국교육공학회 21 (21): 29-62, 2005

      2 Johnson, D. W., "협동학습을 위한 참여적 학습자" 아카데미프레스 2004

      3 박희진, "팀 구성원들의 교류기억과 팀 멘탈모델의 관계 - 팀 학습 행동의 매개를 중심으로" 한국산업및조직심리학회 22 (22): 597-623, 2009

      4 하동환, "집단의 구성방식에 따른 사진교육의 효과" 한국사진학회 14 (14): 58-71, 2006

      5 이영민, "이러닝 기반 팀 학습환경에서 팀인지와 팀 활동과정, 팀성과 간 상관관계 탐색" 한국컴퓨터교육학회 10 (10): 31-38, 2007

      6 장경원, "온라인 PBL에서 학습자들의 문제해결 활동 특성 분석" 한국교육정보미디어학회 12 (12): 33-63, 2006

      7 임인재, "심리측정의 원리" 학연사 2003

      8 정한호, "대학수준 팀 기반 학습에서 공유정신모형의 선행변인과 팀 성과" 한국교육공학회 27 (27): 37-73, 2011

      9 최정임, "대학수업에서의 문제중심학습 적용 사례연구:성찰일기를 통한 효과성 분석을 중심으로" 한국교육공학회 23 (23): 35-65, 2007

      10 김종백, "구성주의에 근거한 문제중심학습의 실천적 과제와 대안의 모색" 한국교육심리학회 18 (18): 59-74, 2004

      11 Barron, S., "When smart group fail" 12 : 307-359, 2003

      12 Strijbos, J. W., "What we know about cscl: And implementing it in higher education" Kluwer/ Springer 2004

      13 Lee, M., "Understanding the Effects of Team Cognition Associated with Complex Engeering Task" 21 (21): 73-95, 2008

      14 Hmelo-Silver, C. E., "Understanding collaborative learning processes in new learning environment" 36 (36): 409-430, 2008

      15 Edmondson, A. C., "Too hot to handle? How to manage relationship conflict" 49 (49): 6-13, 2006

      16 Corno, K., "The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation" 18 (18): 88-108, 1983

      17 Johnson, T. E., "The relationship between shared mental models and task performance in an online team based earning environment" 21 (21): 97-112, 2008

      18 Wang, S. L., "The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning" 23 : 2256-2268, 2007

      19 Soller, A., "Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system" 12 (12): 40-62, 2001

      20 Mukama, E., "Strategizing computer-supported collaborative learning toward knowledge building" 49 : 1-9, 2010

      21 Espinosa, J. A., "Shared mental model: accuracy and visual representation" 2101-2109, 2005

      22 Wong, S., "Shaping collective cognition and behavior through collective learning" 2000

      23 Schvaneveldt, R. W., "Proximities, network, and schemata, In Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization" Ablex 135-148, 1990

      24 Fiore, S. M., "Process mapping and shared cognition, In Team cognition" APA 133-152, 2004

      25 Hmelo-Silver, C. E., "Problem based learning: What and how do students Learn" 16 (16): 235-266, 2004

      26 Chernobilsky, E., "Problem based learning online: Multiple perspectives on collaborative knowledge construction, In Computer supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The next 10 year" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, International Society of the Learning Societies 2005

      27 Barrows, H. S., "Problem based learning in secondary schools" Problem Based Learning Institute Lanphier School, Southern Illinois University Medicine School 1993

      28 Lipponen, L., "Practices and orientations of CSCL, In What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education" Klawer Academic Publisher 2004

      29 강인애, "PBL의 실천적 이해" 문음사 2007

      30 Ingram, A. L., "Methods for analyzing collaboration in online community, In Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice" Information Science Publishing 2004

      31 Strijbos, J. W., "Methodological challenges for collaborative research" 17 : 389-393, 2007

      32 Lagan Fox, J., "Mental models, ream mental models, and performance: Process, develoment, and future directions" 14 (14): 331-352, 2004

      33 Gress, C. L. Z., "Measuring and assessment in computer supported collaborative learning" 2010

      34 Scardamalia, M., "Knowledge building: theory, pedagogy, and technology, In Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences" Cambridge University Press 2006

      35 Scardamalia, M., "Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education knowledge work, In Encyclopedia of distributed learning" Sage Publications 269-272, 2003

      36 Barrows, H. S., "Is it truly possible to have such a thing as d-PBL" 23 (23): 119-122, 2002

      37 Dillenbourg, P., "Introduction: What do you mean by “collaborative learning”?, In Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches" Pergaman Press 1-19, 1999

      38 강혜련, "IT 신제품 개발 팀의 팀 심성모형 측정과 팀 효과성" 한국산업및조직심리학회 18 (18): 23-50, 2005

      39 Hewitt, J., "How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads" 28 : 31-45, 2004

      40 Chiu, C. H., "Group differences in computer supported collaborative learning: Evidence from patterns of Taiwanese students' online communication" 54 : 427-435, 2010

      41 Stahl, G., "Group cognition: computer support for building collaborative knowledge" MIT Press 2006

      42 Schellens, T., "Fostering knowledge construction in university student through asynchronous discussion group" 46 : 349-370, 2006

      43 Barrows, H. S., "Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Building" 26 : 48-94, 2008

      44 Paavola, S., "Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities" Lawrence Erlbaum 2002

      45 Rogoff, B., "Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners" 1 (1): 209-229, 2004

      46 So, H., "Designing collaborative knowledge building environments accessible to all learners: Impacts and design challenges" 54 : 479-490, 2010

      47 Koschmann, T., "Cscl 2: Carrying forwad the conversation" Lawrence Erlbaum Assocoates 2002

      48 Steinkuehler, C. A., "Cracking the resource nut with distributed problem based learning in secondary teacher eduacation" 23 (23): 23-39, 2002

      49 Scardamalia, M., "Computer supported for knowledge building communities" 3 : 265-283, 1994

      50 Gilbert, N. J., "Collaborative knowledge building: A case study" 50 (50): 59-79, 2002

      51 Strauss, A., "Basics of qualitative research: Technique and procedures for development grounded theory(2nd)" Sage 1990

      52 McConnell, D., "Ation Research and Distribut Problem Based Learning in Continuing Professional Education" 23 (23): 59-84, 2002

      53 Choi, H., "Applying an activity system to online collaborative group work analysis" BLACKWELL PUBLISHING 41 (41): 776-795, 2010

      54 Malopinsky, L., "An instructional design model for online problem based learning(PBL) environments: The Learning to Teach with Technology Studio" 2000

      55 Cooke, N. J., "Advances in measuring team cognition, In Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance" American Psychological Association 2004

      56 Van Brugger, J., "A cognitive framework for cooperative problem solving with argument visualization, In Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for educational sense-making" Springer 25-47, 2003

      57 Waker, A., "A Problem Based Learning Meta Analysis: Differences Across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and Assessment Levels" 3 (3): 6-28, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼