RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사회교통지리학의 발전과정 및 전망 = Social Transportation Ceography ; Progress and Perspectives

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3176416

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Two major research fields can be identified in the progress of transportation geography since the 1960s. In the 1960s transportation geography was the leading research field in the quantitative movement in geography. But in the 1970s there was strong criticism of the quantitative approach to transportation geography. The center of the criticism appeared to be that transportation geography had become dehumanized in its academic and applied form, and it had become a tool used by the planners to preserve a system which was basically inhuman and unjust. This paper examines the progress of social transportation geography since 1970s, and proposes several research agenda for the field. The relationship between socio-political structure and transportation systems, social meaning of travel behavior, mobility and accessibility differences between social classes, and urban community devastation due to through traffic are proposed as major prospective research agenda in social transportation geography.
      번역하기

      Two major research fields can be identified in the progress of transportation geography since the 1960s. In the 1960s transportation geography was the leading research field in the quantitative movement in geography. But in the 1970s there was strong ...

      Two major research fields can be identified in the progress of transportation geography since the 1960s. In the 1960s transportation geography was the leading research field in the quantitative movement in geography. But in the 1970s there was strong criticism of the quantitative approach to transportation geography. The center of the criticism appeared to be that transportation geography had become dehumanized in its academic and applied form, and it had become a tool used by the planners to preserve a system which was basically inhuman and unjust. This paper examines the progress of social transportation geography since 1970s, and proposes several research agenda for the field. The relationship between socio-political structure and transportation systems, social meaning of travel behavior, mobility and accessibility differences between social classes, and urban community devastation due to through traffic are proposed as major prospective research agenda in social transportation geography.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼