임의대리의 복대리 이론의 재검토 ― 이른바 ‘표현복임행위’와 ‘표현복대리행위’ 개념의 제안 ― = Reconsideration of sub-representative theory for representative by appointment ― To suggest so called ‘apparent appointing a sub-representative’ and ‘apparent sub-representative act’ ―

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The act of a representative appointing a sub-representative displays a similar structure as a representative act with the opposite party. While the bona fide opponent of the representative is protected by apparent representation, there is no legal protection set in place for the bona fide a sub-representative appointed by the representative. It is unjust to apply disparate legal rulings on two parallel situations.
Thus, a new concept and theory of apparent appointing a sub-representative must be established and applied to protect the apparent sub-representative who trusted that a representative had the right to sub-representative. Furthermore, an act of sub-representative that an apparent sub-representative executed with the opponent needs to be applied to the principal based on the notion of ‘act of apparent sub-representative’. This will then clarify the ambiguity behind the supreme court's logic in applying apparent representation on actions from a sub representative appointed by a representative who does not have the rights to appoint one.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박찬주, "復代理" 법학연구소 19 (19): 61-102, 2008

2 이준형, "현행 대리규정에 관한 입법론적 검토" 민사법의 이론과 실무학회 14 (14): 2010

3 강태성, "제3판 민법총칙" 대명출판사 2008

4 김준호, "복대리인의 행위와 대리권 소멸후의 표현대리" 고시계사 43 (43): 1998

5 이영준, "민법총칙" 박영사 2007

6 이은영, "민법총칙" 박영사 2009

7 정환담, "민법총칙" 형설출판사 2009

8 송덕수, "민법총칙" 박영사 2018

9 백태승, "민법총칙" 법문사 2009

10 김준호, "민법총칙" 법문사 2009

11 김상용, "민법총칙" 화산미디어 2009

12 윤형렬, "민법총칙" 법영사 2009

13 손지열, "민법주해(III" 박영사 1992

14 권순한, "민법요해 I" fides 2009

15 지원림, "민법강의" 법영사 2007

16 강태성, "민법 제1편(총칙) 중의 代理에 관한 개정방향" 법조협회 55 (55): 27-63, 2006