RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      여성주의 경제학의 대안적 연구 동향과 비전 = A Survey on Alternative Development and Future Directions of Feminist Economics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106986623

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to investigate the current trend and future direction of feminist economics. Feminist economics is a kind of critical study of economics including not only its methodology and epistemology but also its history and empirical study. It seeks to produce more gender-aware economics and overcome gender discrimination. Most of Feminist economics focus on topics as follows: women’s work, engendered forms of data collection and measurement such as the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM), and gender-aware economic theories, models and policies.
      In recent years, not only feminism, but also feminist economics is in a state of crisis and thus needs a new vision in its theories and practices. Feminist movements achieved a institutional development of gender equality in most countries. However, real-life situations of women are still considerably discriminatory. This fact has been detected not only in economic areas but also in the whole society. From an economic perspective, women are still facing inequality in terms of income, wealth and working conditions. We deem that feminist economics can be very attractive not only as economics for women, but also as the alternative economics that has the key to solve overall economic problems.
      Unfortunately, nowadays, feminism is in a dilemma as there are controversies. Some people argue that this society does not need feminism anymore, because the goal of movement which is “gender equality,” has been already achieved. On the other hand, some think totally contrary to the former argument. These people argue that we still need feminism because of gender discrimination that has not yet been resolved in today's society.
      Likewise, Feminist economics is facing a similar dilemma. Therefore, from now on, what we have to do is to seek a new prospect and vision of feminist economics. In order to find the possibility of feminist economics, this study deals with the discussion about recent trends of feminist economics.
      To enumerate, this study, first of all, describes why feminism and feminist economics are in the state of dilemma. Next, this study examines the recent development of alternative feminist economics with Socio-economics, Post Keynesian, capability approach and Post deployment argument. Then, it analyzes the practice of feminist economics with eco-feminism, globalization, queer economy and third world feminism. Finally, it suggests the future direction of feminist economics.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to investigate the current trend and future direction of feminist economics. Feminist economics is a kind of critical study of economics including not only its methodology and epistemology but also its history and empirica...

      The purpose of this study is to investigate the current trend and future direction of feminist economics. Feminist economics is a kind of critical study of economics including not only its methodology and epistemology but also its history and empirical study. It seeks to produce more gender-aware economics and overcome gender discrimination. Most of Feminist economics focus on topics as follows: women’s work, engendered forms of data collection and measurement such as the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM), and gender-aware economic theories, models and policies.
      In recent years, not only feminism, but also feminist economics is in a state of crisis and thus needs a new vision in its theories and practices. Feminist movements achieved a institutional development of gender equality in most countries. However, real-life situations of women are still considerably discriminatory. This fact has been detected not only in economic areas but also in the whole society. From an economic perspective, women are still facing inequality in terms of income, wealth and working conditions. We deem that feminist economics can be very attractive not only as economics for women, but also as the alternative economics that has the key to solve overall economic problems.
      Unfortunately, nowadays, feminism is in a dilemma as there are controversies. Some people argue that this society does not need feminism anymore, because the goal of movement which is “gender equality,” has been already achieved. On the other hand, some think totally contrary to the former argument. These people argue that we still need feminism because of gender discrimination that has not yet been resolved in today's society.
      Likewise, Feminist economics is facing a similar dilemma. Therefore, from now on, what we have to do is to seek a new prospect and vision of feminist economics. In order to find the possibility of feminist economics, this study deals with the discussion about recent trends of feminist economics.
      To enumerate, this study, first of all, describes why feminism and feminist economics are in the state of dilemma. Next, this study examines the recent development of alternative feminist economics with Socio-economics, Post Keynesian, capability approach and Post deployment argument. Then, it analyzes the practice of feminist economics with eco-feminism, globalization, queer economy and third world feminism. Finally, it suggests the future direction of feminist economics.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 홍태희, "젠더의 역사적 구성: 성별관계와 여성경제사" 한국여성경제학회 6 (6): 85-109, 2009

      2 한현옥, "젠더와 경제학" 피어슨 2012

      3 홍태희, "여성주의경제학: 대안경제와 젠더" 한울 2014

      4 이재경, "여성주의 정책 패러다임 모색과 ‘성평등’" 한국여성학회 28 (28): 1-33, 2012

      5 홍태희, "여성주의 경제학의 시각과 대안 경제학으로의 가능성" 1 (1): 23-46, 2004

      6 시바, V.․, "에코페미니즘" 창비 2000

      7 윤자영, "사회재생산과 신자유주의적 세계화: 여성주의 정치경제학 이론적 검토" 사회과학연구원 9 (9): 184-211, 2012

      8 김미덕, "미국 여성주의 이론들: 제3세계 페미니즘의 이론적 함의" 한국인문사회과학회 35 (35): 175-201, 2011

      9 홍태희, "돌봄과 수선에 관한 경제학적 이해" 한국여성경제학회 9 (9): 163-182, 2012

      10 정현주, "그따위 자본주의는 벌써 끝났다: 여성주의 정치경제 비판(The End of Capitalism as We Knew It)" 알트 2013

      1 홍태희, "젠더의 역사적 구성: 성별관계와 여성경제사" 한국여성경제학회 6 (6): 85-109, 2009

      2 한현옥, "젠더와 경제학" 피어슨 2012

      3 홍태희, "여성주의경제학: 대안경제와 젠더" 한울 2014

      4 이재경, "여성주의 정책 패러다임 모색과 ‘성평등’" 한국여성학회 28 (28): 1-33, 2012

      5 홍태희, "여성주의 경제학의 시각과 대안 경제학으로의 가능성" 1 (1): 23-46, 2004

      6 시바, V.․, "에코페미니즘" 창비 2000

      7 윤자영, "사회재생산과 신자유주의적 세계화: 여성주의 정치경제학 이론적 검토" 사회과학연구원 9 (9): 184-211, 2012

      8 김미덕, "미국 여성주의 이론들: 제3세계 페미니즘의 이론적 함의" 한국인문사회과학회 35 (35): 175-201, 2011

      9 홍태희, "돌봄과 수선에 관한 경제학적 이해" 한국여성경제학회 9 (9): 163-182, 2012

      10 정현주, "그따위 자본주의는 벌써 끝났다: 여성주의 정치경제 비판(The End of Capitalism as We Knew It)" 알트 2013

      11 맥마이클, P., "거대한 역설: 왜 개발할수록 불평등해지는가" 교양인 2013

      12 洪太喜, "經濟學과 젠더 : 性別經濟學(gender economics) 定立을 위한 近代經濟學 批判" 한국경제학회 51 (51): 6-177, 2003

      13 장필화, "‘발전 ’에 대한 새로운 상상 : ‘나눔 경제 ’와 여성주의 대안 모색" 한국여성철학회 20 : 207-230, 2013

      14 Hanmer, L.C., "the house of the spirits: toward a Post Keynesian theory of the household?" 20 : 415-433, 1998

      15 Karamessini, M., "Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and The Future for Gender Equality" Routledge 2014

      16 Mathes, M., "Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften, Auf dem Weg zu einer Ökonomie des Guten Lebens" Kleine Verlag 2000

      17 Picchio, A., "Unpaid Work and the Economy: A Gender Analysis of the Standards of Living" Routledge 2003

      18 Lamble, S., "Twenty Years of Feminist Legal Studies: Reflections and Future Directions" 22 (22): 109-130, 2014

      19 Barker, D.K., "Toward a feminist Philosophy of Economics" Routledge 2003

      20 Visvanathan, "The Women, Gender and Development Reader" Zed Books 2011

      21 Belkin, L, "The New Gender Gap"

      22 Robeyns, I., "The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey" 6 : 93-114, 2005

      23 Schneider, G., "Ten Principles of Feminist Economics: A Modestly Proposed Antidote" Dept. of Economics, Bucknell University

      24 Gibson-Graham, J. K., "Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming our Communities" University of Minnesota Press 2013

      25 Allard, J., "Solidarity economy: building alternatives for people and planet; papers and reports from the U.S. Social Forum 2007" Change Maker Publications 2008

      26 Matthaei, J., "Solidarity Economy: Building Alternatives for People and Planet" Changemaker Publishing 2008

      27 Power, M., "Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics" 10 : 3-19, 2004

      28 Simon, D., "Separated by Common Ground? Bringing (Post)Development and(Post)colonialism Together" 172 (172): 10-21, 2006

      29 Jacobsen, J.P, "Queer Economics" Routledge 2007

      30 Cullenberg, S., "Postmodernism, Economics, and Knowledge" Routledge 2001

      31 van Staveren, I., "Post-Keynesianism meets feminist economics" 34 (34): 1123-1144, 2010

      32 Bergeron, S., "Political Economy Discourses of Globalization and Feminist Politics" 26 (26): 983-1006, 2002

      33 Rai, S.M, "New Frontiers in Feminist Political Economy" Routledge 2013

      34 Ahl, H, "Moving forward: institutional perspectives on gender and entrepreneurship" 2 : 5-9, 2010

      35 Badgett, M. V. L., "Money, Myths, and Change: The Economic Lives of Lesbians and Gay Men" University Of Chicago Press 2003

      36 Freiburg-Strauss, J., "Macro-Economics: Making Gender Matter Concepts, Policies and Institutional Change in Developing Countries" Zed Books 88-105, 2003

      37 Cagatay, N., "Macro-Economics: Making Gender Matter Concepts, Policies and Institutional Change in Developing Countries" Zed Books 22-41, 2003

      38 McIntosh, P., "Interactive Phases of Curricular Re-Vision: A Feminist Perspective" Wellesley College, Center for Research on Women 1983

      39 Hirway, I., "Integrating Unpaid Work into Development Policy" Levy Institute 2005

      40 Gilligan, C., "In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development" Harvard University Press 1997

      41 Waring, M., "If Women Counted: A New Feminist Economics" Harper and Row 1988

      42 Vaughan, G., "Homo Donan" Anomaly Press 2007

      43 Matthaei, J., "Healing Ourselves, Healing Our Economy: Paid Work, Unpaid Work, and the Next Stage of Feminist Economic Transformation" 33 : 461-494, 2001

      44 Moghadam, V. M., "Globalizing women: Transnational feminist networks" The Johns Hopkins University Press 2005

      45 Perrons, D., "Gendering inequality: a note on Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century" 65 (65): 667-677, 2014

      46 Benería, L., "Gender, development, and globalization: economics as if all people mattered" Routledge 2003

      47 Seguino, S., "Gender, Distribution, and Balance of Payments Constrained Growth in Developing Countries" 22 : 373-404, 2010

      48 Figart, D. M., "Gender as more than a dummy variable: Feminist approaches to discrimination" 55 : 1-32, 1997

      49 Pearson, R., "Gender and the Economic Crisis" Practical Action 2011

      50 Stotsky, J., "Gender and Its Relevance to Macroeconomic Policy: A Survey" IMF 2006

      51 Bauhardt, C., "Gender and Economics. Feministische Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie" VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 2010

      52 Nilsson, P., "Gender and Development: The Challenge of Mainstream, Consilience" 10 : 125-135, 2013

      53 Antonopoulos, R., "Gender Perspectives and Gender Impacts of the Global Economic Crisis" Routledge 2013

      54 Seguino, S., "Gender Inequality and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Analysis" 28 : 1211-1230, 2000

      55 Akram-Lodhi, A.H, "Frontiers in the Economics of Gender, Siena Studies in Political Economy" Routledge 2008

      56 Bettio, F., "Frontiers in the Economics of Gender" Routledge 2008

      57 Fraser, N., "Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis" 22 (22): 323-329, 2014

      58 Floro, M., "Financial Crisis, Gender, and Power: An Analytical Framework" 28 : 1269-1283, 2000

      59 Cameron, J., "Feminizing the economy: metaphors, strategies, politics" 10 : 145-157, 2003

      60 Austen, S., "Feminist and post-Keynesian economics: challenges and opportunities" 34 (34): 1109-1122, 2010

      61 Saunders, K., "Feminist Post-Development Thought: Rethinking Modernity, Post-Colonialism and Representation" Zed Books 2003

      62 Perkins, P., "Feminist Ecological Economics and Sustainability" 9 (9): 227-244, 2007

      63 Jones, A., "Feminism and Visual Culture Reader" Routledge 2003

      64 Plumwood, V., "Feminism and Ecofeminism: Beyond the Dualistic Assumptions of Women, Men and Nature" 2 : 36-51, 1993

      65 Hughes, C., "Feminism Counts: Quantitative Methods and Researching Gender" Routledge 2013

      66 Ziai, A., "Exploring Post-development: Theory and Practice, Problems and Perspectives" Routledge 2007

      67 Walters, B., "Engendering Macroeconomics: A Reconsideration of Growth Theory" 23 : 1869-1880, 1995

      68 Albelda, R., "Economics and Feminism, Disturbance in the Field" Twayne Publishing 1997

      69 Warren, K., "Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters" Rowman and Littlefield 2000

      70 Rapley, J., "Development Studies and the Post-Development Critique" 4 (4): 350-354, 2004

      71 Bjørnholt, M., "Counting on Marilyn Waring: New Advances in Feminist Economics" Demeter Press 2014

      72 Sen, A., "Commodities and Capabilities" Oxford University Press 1985

      73 Nussbaum, M., "Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice" 9 : 33-59, 2003

      74 Ferber, M.A, "Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics" The University of Chicago Press 1993

      75 Agarwal, B., "Bargaining and Gender Relations: Within And Beyond The Household" 3 : 1-51, 1997

      76 Knowels, "Are Educational gender gap a brake on economic development? Some cross-country empirical evidence" 54 : 118-149, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.46 0.46 0.43
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.42 0.4 0.668 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼