RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국과 미국의 부동산법제에 관한 비교연구 (2) = Comparative Research of Real Estate Laws in Korea and U.S. (2) - On Judicial Foreclosure -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82512000

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to compare the real estate executive proceedings of U.S., particularly judicial foreclosure out of such proceedings centered on mortgage with those of Korea. (2) RESEARCH METHOD This study in conducted by field investigation and confirmation of practical contents after access to relevant webpages, s well as domestic ad foreign literature review. (2) RESEARCH FINDINGS The results of this study may present an opportunity not only to simply compare real estate foreclosure but to consider what to improve in foreclosure system. 2. RESULTS First, the judicial foreclosure in U.S. laws (the State of New York) is similar to foreclosure proceedings of Korea because in requires participation of the court. Second, the judicial foreclosure in U.S. laws in different from that of Korea because in selects a principal of acceptance, it does not have minimum sale institution, and does not require investigation of the status, real estate appraisal, and specification. Third, the judicial foreclosure in U.S. laws is more able to occur damage to the interested parties due to shortage of information presentation on the parties, while from the external aspect, the rapidity in the proceedings may be secured more than that of Korea. Fourth, the difference between the real estate foreclosure proceedings of Kora and the judicial foreclosure in U.S. laws in surrounded environments should betaken into sufficient consideration when American institutions are referred to. In particular, further studies on other states are needed because real estate foreclosure laws are different from states.
    번역하기

    1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to compare the real estate executive proceedings of U.S., particularly judicial foreclosure out of such proceedings centered on mortgage with those of Korea. (2) RESEARCH METHOD This stu...

    1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to compare the real estate executive proceedings of U.S., particularly judicial foreclosure out of such proceedings centered on mortgage with those of Korea. (2) RESEARCH METHOD This study in conducted by field investigation and confirmation of practical contents after access to relevant webpages, s well as domestic ad foreign literature review. (2) RESEARCH FINDINGS The results of this study may present an opportunity not only to simply compare real estate foreclosure but to consider what to improve in foreclosure system. 2. RESULTS First, the judicial foreclosure in U.S. laws (the State of New York) is similar to foreclosure proceedings of Korea because in requires participation of the court. Second, the judicial foreclosure in U.S. laws in different from that of Korea because in selects a principal of acceptance, it does not have minimum sale institution, and does not require investigation of the status, real estate appraisal, and specification. Third, the judicial foreclosure in U.S. laws is more able to occur damage to the interested parties due to shortage of information presentation on the parties, while from the external aspect, the rapidity in the proceedings may be secured more than that of Korea. Fourth, the difference between the real estate foreclosure proceedings of Kora and the judicial foreclosure in U.S. laws in surrounded environments should betaken into sufficient consideration when American institutions are referred to. In particular, further studies on other states are needed because real estate foreclosure laws are different from states.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서 론
    • II. 미국의 부동산경매제도 개관
    • III. 미국의 사법형 부동산경매절차
    • IV. 한국의 부동산경매절차와의 비교
    • V. 결론 및 시사점
    • I. 서 론
    • II. 미국의 부동산경매제도 개관
    • III. 미국의 사법형 부동산경매절차
    • IV. 한국의 부동산경매절차와의 비교
    • V. 결론 및 시사점
    • <참고문헌>
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 서희원, "영미법강의" 박영사 1994

    2 김완석, "소득세법" 광교이택스 2009

    3 법원행정처, "법원실무제요Ⅲ(부동산집행)" 법원행정처 2003

    4 로렌스 M 프리드만, "미국법의 역사" 청림출판사 2006

    5 박종찬, "물권법" 강원대학교 출판부 2008

    6 "대법원경매정보사이트"

    7 법무성, "경매제도연구회보고서" 2008

    8 笠井正俊, "ニュ-ヨ-ク州の不動産競賣手續"

    9 "http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/RPAPL/rpapl13.html"

    10 "http://www.koreadaily.com/news/read.asp?art_id=943340"

    1 서희원, "영미법강의" 박영사 1994

    2 김완석, "소득세법" 광교이택스 2009

    3 법원행정처, "법원실무제요Ⅲ(부동산집행)" 법원행정처 2003

    4 로렌스 M 프리드만, "미국법의 역사" 청림출판사 2006

    5 박종찬, "물권법" 강원대학교 출판부 2008

    6 "대법원경매정보사이트"

    7 법무성, "경매제도연구회보고서" 2008

    8 笠井正俊, "ニュ-ヨ-ク州の不動産競賣手續"

    9 "http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/RPAPL/rpapl13.html"

    10 "http://www.koreadaily.com/news/read.asp?art_id=943340"

    11 "http://www.koreadaily.com/news/read.asp?art_id=856489"

    12 "http://www.koreadaily.com/news/read.asp?art_id=767267"

    13 "http://www.koreadaily.com/news/read.asp?art_id=1005859"

    14 "http://www.ceotimes.co.kr/sub_read.html?uid=7309"

    15 "http://japanlaw.blog.ocn.ne.jp/japan_law_express/2005"

    16 Marianne Moody Jennings, "Real Estate Law(5ed.)" WEST 1999

    17 George J.SiedelⅢ․, "Real Estate Law(4ed.)" WEST 1999

    18 Robin Paul Malloy, "Real Estate" ASPEN 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.61 2.61 1.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.49 1.25 0.704 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼