RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    스포츠 속 공정에 관한 비판적 고찰: McKinnon의 주장을 중심으로 = An Analysis of McKinnon’s Thesis on Fairness in Sport

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107277972

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to examine the problem of luck, which determines the starting line of competition in sport, in relation to fairness, and critically reviews McKinnon’s argument, which finds that the ability of athletes is not a result of their own choices or efforts, but of ‘natural lottery’. This paper clarifies the significance and limitation of McKinnon’s ‘equal luck’ thesis; he claims that it is entirely a matter of luck as to who was born with a gene that favors the sport, and that it is unfair and unjust for only some lucky players to take all the rewards and praise not earned through their efforts. To this end, this paper 1) examines the meaning of fairness in sport in terms of justice, 2) investigates some cases and reasons for fairness controversy, and 3) critically analyzes McKinnon’s plan to lessen inequalities which rise from the structural problem of luck determining the starting point of a competition. The main criticism of this paper on McKinnon’s claim of ‘equal luck’ in sport can be divided into three categories. The first is that there is a lack of understanding of the intrinsic purpose of sport competition; the second is that the concepts of fairness and equality must be distinguished; and the third is that although genetically innate talents are not available to all athletes, such talents are a priori and natural rights for those who were given them and cannot be violated. There are not many studies that approach fairness and justice in sport from the perspective of luck egalitarianism. In that context, this study is expected to serve as an opportunity to reexamine the meaning and standards of fairness in sport.
    번역하기

    This study aims to examine the problem of luck, which determines the starting line of competition in sport, in relation to fairness, and critically reviews McKinnon’s argument, which finds that the ability of athletes is not a result of their own ch...

    This study aims to examine the problem of luck, which determines the starting line of competition in sport, in relation to fairness, and critically reviews McKinnon’s argument, which finds that the ability of athletes is not a result of their own choices or efforts, but of ‘natural lottery’. This paper clarifies the significance and limitation of McKinnon’s ‘equal luck’ thesis; he claims that it is entirely a matter of luck as to who was born with a gene that favors the sport, and that it is unfair and unjust for only some lucky players to take all the rewards and praise not earned through their efforts. To this end, this paper 1) examines the meaning of fairness in sport in terms of justice, 2) investigates some cases and reasons for fairness controversy, and 3) critically analyzes McKinnon’s plan to lessen inequalities which rise from the structural problem of luck determining the starting point of a competition. The main criticism of this paper on McKinnon’s claim of ‘equal luck’ in sport can be divided into three categories. The first is that there is a lack of understanding of the intrinsic purpose of sport competition; the second is that the concepts of fairness and equality must be distinguished; and the third is that although genetically innate talents are not available to all athletes, such talents are a priori and natural rights for those who were given them and cannot be violated. There are not many studies that approach fairness and justice in sport from the perspective of luck egalitarianism. In that context, this study is expected to serve as an opportunity to reexamine the meaning and standards of fairness in sport.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김도균, "한국 법질서와 정의론: 공정과 공평, 그리고 운의 평등 - 試論 -" 법학연구소 53 (53): 325-413, 2012

    2 박성주, "트랜스젠더의 스포츠 접근권에 관한 윤리적 고찰" 한국체육학회 59 (59): 1-12, 2020

    3 김문정, "제로섬 사회에서의 약물 인지향상과 공정성" 새한철학회 94 (94): 419-437, 2018

    4 박상수, "운 평등주의에 대한 비판" 한국제도∙경제학회 8 (8): 113-134, 2014

    5 정준영, "열광하는 스포츠, 은폐된 이데올로기" 책세상 2003

    6 임석원, "스포츠에서의 공정성과 평등" 중앙철학연구소 46 : 201-231, 2017

    7 이관후, "블라인드 채용은 정의로운가?: 메리토크라시와 운평등주의적 검토" 현대정치연구소 12 (12): 69-100, 2019

    8 McKinnon, R., "You Make Your Own Luck" 45 (45): 558-577, 2014

    9 Carr, D., "Where’s the Merit if the Best Man Wins?" 26 (26): 1-9, 1999

    10 Bianchi, A., "Transgender Women in Sport" 44 (44): 229-242, 2017

    1 김도균, "한국 법질서와 정의론: 공정과 공평, 그리고 운의 평등 - 試論 -" 법학연구소 53 (53): 325-413, 2012

    2 박성주, "트랜스젠더의 스포츠 접근권에 관한 윤리적 고찰" 한국체육학회 59 (59): 1-12, 2020

    3 김문정, "제로섬 사회에서의 약물 인지향상과 공정성" 새한철학회 94 (94): 419-437, 2018

    4 박상수, "운 평등주의에 대한 비판" 한국제도∙경제학회 8 (8): 113-134, 2014

    5 정준영, "열광하는 스포츠, 은폐된 이데올로기" 책세상 2003

    6 임석원, "스포츠에서의 공정성과 평등" 중앙철학연구소 46 : 201-231, 2017

    7 이관후, "블라인드 채용은 정의로운가?: 메리토크라시와 운평등주의적 검토" 현대정치연구소 12 (12): 69-100, 2019

    8 McKinnon, R., "You Make Your Own Luck" 45 (45): 558-577, 2014

    9 Carr, D., "Where’s the Merit if the Best Man Wins?" 26 (26): 1-9, 1999

    10 Bianchi, A., "Transgender Women in Sport" 44 (44): 229-242, 2017

    11 Sandel, M., "The Tyranny of Merit : What’s Become of the Common Good? New" Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2020

    12 Dworkin, R., "Talking Rights Seriously" arvard University Press 1977

    13 McKinnon, R., "Stereotype Threat and Attributional Ambiguity for Trans Women" 29 (29): 857-872, 2014

    14 Feezell, R., "Sport, Philosophy and Good Lives" University of Nebraska Press 2013

    15 Dworkin, R., "Sovereign Virtue" Harvard University Press 2000

    16 Kretchmar, S., "Practical Philosophy of Sport and Physical Activity" Human Kinetics 2005

    17 Dixon, N., "On Winning and Athletic Superiority" 26 (26): 10-26, 1999

    18 Latus, A., "Moral and Epistemic Luck" 25 : 149-172, 2000

    19 Arneson, R., "Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism" 110 (110): 339-349, 2000

    20 McKinnon, R., "Getting Luck Properly Under Control" 44 (44): 496-511, 2013

    21 Simon, R., "Fair Play: The Ethics of Sport" Westview Press 2010

    22 Simon, R., "Deserving to Be Lucky:Reflections on the Role of Luck and Desert in Sports" 34 : 13-25, 2007

    23 Gleaves, J., "Beyond Fairness: the Ethics of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes" 43 (43): 311-326, 2016

    24 Nozick, R., "Anarchy, State, and Utopia" Basic Books 1974

    25 Rawls, J., "A Theory of Justice" Harvard University Press 1971

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.34 1.34 1.4
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.44 1.45 1.24 0.33
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼