RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      부산 · 경남 지역의 고혈압 사례관리사업 실시 효과 = Effect of the Case Management Program for Hypertension Patients in Busan and Gyeongsangnam-do

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60247997

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background : Hypertension is one of the high prevalence disease and 9th common death cause of Korean in 2006. The effective management for hypertension is continuous treatments and maintenance of healthy life style. So, we started this study to verify effect of the case management program as a method for maintenance of hypertension management which is conducted by the National Health Insurance Corporation.
      Method : We studied effect of the case management for hypertension patients during the period from January to December in 2006. Investigation subjects were 364 hypertension patients residing in Busan and Gyeongsangnam-do. We conducted the case management program for hypertension patient that case managers in each areas performed 3 times visiting and 1 time phone arbitration according to protocol of the case management program by the National Health Insurance Corporation. We evaluated effect of the case management program based on changes of blood pressure, knowledge level for hypertension, self-management level for hypertension patients. Data analysis was performed with t-test and paired t-test using SPSS Win(ver 12.0K) program.
      Result : After the case management program, mean blood pressure was improved from 113.88 ± 29.41 mmHg to 107.84 ± 25.47 mmHg(p<0.01), systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were decreased from 139.44 ±17.54 mmHg to 130.98 ± 12.82 mmHg and from 88.33 ± 10.73 mmHg to 84.70 ± 7.84 mmHg(p<0.01). The level of knowledge on 9-point scale for hypertension was increase from 5.65 ± 1.77 before the case management to 7.65 ± 1.36 after the case management(p<0.01) and the level of self-management behaviors for hypertension(sum of the score was 35 points) was improved from 22.69 ± 3.96 to 26.06 ± 3.48(p<0.01). Smoking quantity(cigarette per day) and drinking frequency(time per week) were reduced from 14.74 ± 7.48 and 3.45 ± 4.66 to 12.41 ± 8.24 and 2.56 ± 1.74(p<0.05), exercise frequency(time per week) was increased from 4.60 ± 1.75 to 4.79 ± 1.67(p<0.01).
      Conclusion : From the result, we can concluded that the case management program conducted by the National Health Insurance Corporation showed decrease of blood pressure, improvements of self-management and knowledge level for hypertension. The case management program for hypertension needs to be developed in a way that increases not only hypertension patient's motivation to manage their diseases but also improvement of public heath system. For the widespread use of the case management program among hypertension patients, media-based promotional campaign and supporting of public health system are much required
      번역하기

      Background : Hypertension is one of the high prevalence disease and 9th common death cause of Korean in 2006. The effective management for hypertension is continuous treatments and maintenance of healthy life style. So, we started this study to verify...

      Background : Hypertension is one of the high prevalence disease and 9th common death cause of Korean in 2006. The effective management for hypertension is continuous treatments and maintenance of healthy life style. So, we started this study to verify effect of the case management program as a method for maintenance of hypertension management which is conducted by the National Health Insurance Corporation.
      Method : We studied effect of the case management for hypertension patients during the period from January to December in 2006. Investigation subjects were 364 hypertension patients residing in Busan and Gyeongsangnam-do. We conducted the case management program for hypertension patient that case managers in each areas performed 3 times visiting and 1 time phone arbitration according to protocol of the case management program by the National Health Insurance Corporation. We evaluated effect of the case management program based on changes of blood pressure, knowledge level for hypertension, self-management level for hypertension patients. Data analysis was performed with t-test and paired t-test using SPSS Win(ver 12.0K) program.
      Result : After the case management program, mean blood pressure was improved from 113.88 ± 29.41 mmHg to 107.84 ± 25.47 mmHg(p<0.01), systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were decreased from 139.44 ±17.54 mmHg to 130.98 ± 12.82 mmHg and from 88.33 ± 10.73 mmHg to 84.70 ± 7.84 mmHg(p<0.01). The level of knowledge on 9-point scale for hypertension was increase from 5.65 ± 1.77 before the case management to 7.65 ± 1.36 after the case management(p<0.01) and the level of self-management behaviors for hypertension(sum of the score was 35 points) was improved from 22.69 ± 3.96 to 26.06 ± 3.48(p<0.01). Smoking quantity(cigarette per day) and drinking frequency(time per week) were reduced from 14.74 ± 7.48 and 3.45 ± 4.66 to 12.41 ± 8.24 and 2.56 ± 1.74(p<0.05), exercise frequency(time per week) was increased from 4.60 ± 1.75 to 4.79 ± 1.67(p<0.01).
      Conclusion : From the result, we can concluded that the case management program conducted by the National Health Insurance Corporation showed decrease of blood pressure, improvements of self-management and knowledge level for hypertension. The case management program for hypertension needs to be developed in a way that increases not only hypertension patient's motivation to manage their diseases but also improvement of public heath system. For the widespread use of the case management program among hypertension patients, media-based promotional campaign and supporting of public health system are much required

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 서론
      • 연구대상 및 방법
      • 1. 연구대상 및 기간
      • 2. 연구방법
      • 연구결과
      • 서론
      • 연구대상 및 방법
      • 1. 연구대상 및 기간
      • 2. 연구방법
      • 연구결과
      • 1. 연구 대상자의 일반적 특성
      • 2. 사례관리에 따른 혈압변화
      • 3. 사례관리에 따른 고혈압 지식 및 자가관리 수준의 변화
      • 4. 사례관리에 따른 건강관련 행위의 변화
      • 고찰
      • 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조추용, "사례관리의 이론과 실제" 유풍출판사 2000

      2 국민보험공단, "사례관리사업 매뉴얼"

      3 Ha YC, "The prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, and related factors in rural Korea" 33 (33): 513-520, 2000

      4 Burt VL, "Prevalence of hypertension in US adult population : result from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-1991" 25 : 305-313, 1995

      5 Knight EL, "Predictor of uncontrolled hypertension in ambullatory patients" 38 (38): 809-814, 2001

      6 Wallace RB, "Maxcy-Rosenau-Last Public Health &Preventive Medicine" Appleton & Lange 949-957, 1998

      7 Izzo JL, "Hypertension Primer" Williams & Willkins 156-166, 1999

      8 Kaplan NM, "Clinical hypertension" Williams & Willkins 133-155, 1998

      9 통계청, "2006 사망원인 통계 결과(사망원인 순위별 사암자수, 구성비, 사망률)"

      10 보건복지부, "2005년도 국민건강 영양조사(검진편)"

      1 조추용, "사례관리의 이론과 실제" 유풍출판사 2000

      2 국민보험공단, "사례관리사업 매뉴얼"

      3 Ha YC, "The prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, and related factors in rural Korea" 33 (33): 513-520, 2000

      4 Burt VL, "Prevalence of hypertension in US adult population : result from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-1991" 25 : 305-313, 1995

      5 Knight EL, "Predictor of uncontrolled hypertension in ambullatory patients" 38 (38): 809-814, 2001

      6 Wallace RB, "Maxcy-Rosenau-Last Public Health &Preventive Medicine" Appleton & Lange 949-957, 1998

      7 Izzo JL, "Hypertension Primer" Williams & Willkins 156-166, 1999

      8 Kaplan NM, "Clinical hypertension" Williams & Willkins 133-155, 1998

      9 통계청, "2006 사망원인 통계 결과(사망원인 순위별 사암자수, 구성비, 사망률)"

      10 보건복지부, "2005년도 국민건강 영양조사(검진편)"

      11 보건복지부, "2001년도 국민건강 영양조사(검진편)"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.02 0.02 0.03
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.04 0.04 0.21 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼