RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    공공갈등관리를 위한 제도정비방향 = Institutional Reform for Conflict Management in the Public Sector

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45002619

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Globalization, participatory democracy and emergence of new public management theory create new governance in the public sector. It reflects societal changes triggered by borderless economy, increased diversity in the society and emergence of knowledge-based information society.
    Under such circumstances, the traditional parliamentary system does not suffice reflecting complicated relations of interest in diversified society not to mention the public opinion. Public disputes have not been properly handled through traditional dispute resolution methods. For theses reasons, we need to establish new conflict management systems in the public sector. New systems require the new public decision-making paradigm based upon people's participation, consensus building and collaboration. In the new paradigm, social corporatism and deliberative democracy are outstanding ways of thinking. Although the two are not necessarily connected, they commonly stress the importance of social consensus in policy-making and dispute resolution process.
    In the light of social changes and paradigm shifts in policy-making and dispute resolution process all over the world, I conclude that a wide variety of institutional reforms as follows should be implemented in order to prevent public disputes and achieve consensus dispute resolution in the public sector.
    First, social reforms for people's basic needs
    Second, the paradigm shift in public decision-making process from command and control to participation and collaboration
    Third, formulation of social capital through education and publicity
    Fourth, activation of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the public sector
    Fifth, establishment of legal systems for the clients in the public sector.
    번역하기

    Globalization, participatory democracy and emergence of new public management theory create new governance in the public sector. It reflects societal changes triggered by borderless economy, increased diversity in the society and emergence of knowledg...

    Globalization, participatory democracy and emergence of new public management theory create new governance in the public sector. It reflects societal changes triggered by borderless economy, increased diversity in the society and emergence of knowledge-based information society.
    Under such circumstances, the traditional parliamentary system does not suffice reflecting complicated relations of interest in diversified society not to mention the public opinion. Public disputes have not been properly handled through traditional dispute resolution methods. For theses reasons, we need to establish new conflict management systems in the public sector. New systems require the new public decision-making paradigm based upon people's participation, consensus building and collaboration. In the new paradigm, social corporatism and deliberative democracy are outstanding ways of thinking. Although the two are not necessarily connected, they commonly stress the importance of social consensus in policy-making and dispute resolution process.
    In the light of social changes and paradigm shifts in policy-making and dispute resolution process all over the world, I conclude that a wide variety of institutional reforms as follows should be implemented in order to prevent public disputes and achieve consensus dispute resolution in the public sector.
    First, social reforms for people's basic needs
    Second, the paradigm shift in public decision-making process from command and control to participation and collaboration
    Third, formulation of social capital through education and publicity
    Fourth, activation of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the public sector
    Fifth, establishment of legal systems for the clients in the public sector.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 문제의 제기: 사회변화와 공공갈등
    • Ⅱ. 공공갈등에 대한 대응을 위한 우리 사회의 infra 진단
    • Ⅲ. 선진 외국의 공공갈등에 대한 대응: 거시적 구조변화와 대응제도의 실례
    • Ⅳ. 공공갈등 대응을 위한 제도정비의 방향
    • Ⅴ. 결어
    • Ⅰ. 문제의 제기: 사회변화와 공공갈등
    • Ⅱ. 공공갈등에 대한 대응을 위한 우리 사회의 infra 진단
    • Ⅲ. 선진 외국의 공공갈등에 대한 대응: 거시적 구조변화와 대응제도의 실례
    • Ⅳ. 공공갈등 대응을 위한 제도정비의 방향
    • Ⅴ. 결어
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 홍준형, "행정절차법제정연구"

    2 백윤기, "행정소송제도의 개선"

    3 박정훈, "행정소송에 있어서의 소송상 화해" (279) : 1999

    4 박상필, "이익집단 갈등과 사회자본:경실련의 한약분쟁조정사례연구" 34 (34): 2000

    5 정호원, "사회갈등 어떻게 해결할 것인가 -미국의 갈등해결 및 교육시스템을 중심으로-" (14) : 2004

    6 "국민의 사법참여" 사법개혁위원회 제2분과 전문위원연구반 2000

    7 서철모, "갈등관리시시템 구축의 추진방향" 2004

    8 Lawrence, "The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking 3 Yale Journal on Regulation 133." 1985

    9 Evans, "The Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 Improving Federal Agency Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes" 50 (50): 1998

    10 C. Philippe, "Still the Century of Corporatism in Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation edited by P.C. Schmitter & Gehard Lembruch." 1979

    1 홍준형, "행정절차법제정연구"

    2 백윤기, "행정소송제도의 개선"

    3 박정훈, "행정소송에 있어서의 소송상 화해" (279) : 1999

    4 박상필, "이익집단 갈등과 사회자본:경실련의 한약분쟁조정사례연구" 34 (34): 2000

    5 정호원, "사회갈등 어떻게 해결할 것인가 -미국의 갈등해결 및 교육시스템을 중심으로-" (14) : 2004

    6 "국민의 사법참여" 사법개혁위원회 제2분과 전문위원연구반 2000

    7 서철모, "갈등관리시시템 구축의 추진방향" 2004

    8 Lawrence, "The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking 3 Yale Journal on Regulation 133." 1985

    9 Evans, "The Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 Improving Federal Agency Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes" 50 (50): 1998

    10 C. Philippe, "Still the Century of Corporatism in Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation edited by P.C. Schmitter & Gehard Lembruch." 1979

    11 Pollet, Ignace, "Public Involvement in Mobility Planning--Lessons for Mobility Management" 2001

    12 Conen, "Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy" Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political" 1996

    13 E. Lawrence, "Overview of Developments in Public Participation in Public Participation in Environmental Decisionmaking edited by ABA Standing Committee on Environmental Law" 1994

    14 Schmidt, "Organisierte Einwirkungen auf die Verwaltung-Zur Lage der zweiten Gewalt" 1975

    15 Hirst, Paul, "Globalization and the Future of the Nation State" 24 (24): 1995

    16 Blackburn, "Environmetal Mediation as an Alternative to Litigation in Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Public Sector" 1991

    17 Hugh, "Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention" 1999

    18 Leonhardt, "Conflict Impact Assessment for Development Projects" 2001

    19 Hukuyama, ""Social Capital and Civil Society" prepared for Delivery at the IMF Conference on Second Generation Reforms" 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.08 1.08 1.06
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.04 0.96 1.025 0.31
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼