RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      How Are Stock Prices Affected by the Cheap Talk? = Evidence from the Disclosure of Repurchase Motives

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103372204

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examines whether cheap talk affects the stock market over short-term and long-term time periods. Cheap talk, which is neither costly nor binding, can be defined as a kind of non-fundamental sentiment shock. A good example of cheap talk is the disclosure of repurchase motives in the Korean stock market in that repurchasing companies are required to report their repurchase motives, however, not forcing the ex post implementation. To check how the stock market reacts to cheap talk, we divide cheap talk into good and bad talk. Cheap talk classified as good talk involves repurchase motives that support outside investors, such as stabilizing stock prices and share retirement, whereas bad talk involves repurchase motives intended for insiders, such as to provide employee and executive incentives and to entrench management. After controlling for firm characteristics, we found that over the short-term time period, repurchase motives grouped as bad talk deliver significantly negative signals to the market. However, over long-term time periods, again controlling for firm characteristics, the market`s reactions to both good talk and bad talk on stock repurchase disclosures are indistinguishable. These results imply that market participants react partially to cheap talk in the short-term only.
      번역하기

      This study examines whether cheap talk affects the stock market over short-term and long-term time periods. Cheap talk, which is neither costly nor binding, can be defined as a kind of non-fundamental sentiment shock. A good example of cheap talk is t...

      This study examines whether cheap talk affects the stock market over short-term and long-term time periods. Cheap talk, which is neither costly nor binding, can be defined as a kind of non-fundamental sentiment shock. A good example of cheap talk is the disclosure of repurchase motives in the Korean stock market in that repurchasing companies are required to report their repurchase motives, however, not forcing the ex post implementation. To check how the stock market reacts to cheap talk, we divide cheap talk into good and bad talk. Cheap talk classified as good talk involves repurchase motives that support outside investors, such as stabilizing stock prices and share retirement, whereas bad talk involves repurchase motives intended for insiders, such as to provide employee and executive incentives and to entrench management. After controlling for firm characteristics, we found that over the short-term time period, repurchase motives grouped as bad talk deliver significantly negative signals to the market. However, over long-term time periods, again controlling for firm characteristics, the market`s reactions to both good talk and bad talk on stock repurchase disclosures are indistinguishable. These results imply that market participants react partially to cheap talk in the short-term only.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정형찬, "한국증권시장에서의 장기성과 측정모형의 검정력과 통계적 오류" 한국증권학회 36 (36): 237-280, 2007

      2 변진호, "저평가 자사주 매입 공시의 허위정보 신호효과와 장기성과" 한국증권학회 33 (33): 207-248, 2004

      3 정성창, "자사주 취득 기업들의 장기성과에 관한 연구" 한국재무학회 16 (16): 129-162, 2003

      4 Dittmar, A., "Why do firms repurchase stock" 73 : 331-355, 2000

      5 Oded, J., "Why do firms announce open-market repurchase programs" 18 : 271-300, 2005

      6 안병주, "What Drives Firms’ Financial Decisions? Evidence from the Field" 한국증권학회 40 (40): 219-260, 2011

      7 Jolls, C., "The role of incentive compensation in explaining the stock repurchase puzzle" Harvard Law School 1998

      8 Ikenberry, D, "Stock repurchases in Canada: performance and strategic trading" 55 : 2373-2397, 2000

      9 Masulis, R, "Stock repurchase by tender offer: An analysis of the causes of common stock price changes" 35 : 305-318, 1980

      10 Bagwell, L. S, "Share repurchase and takeover deterrence" 22 : 72-88, 1991

      1 정형찬, "한국증권시장에서의 장기성과 측정모형의 검정력과 통계적 오류" 한국증권학회 36 (36): 237-280, 2007

      2 변진호, "저평가 자사주 매입 공시의 허위정보 신호효과와 장기성과" 한국증권학회 33 (33): 207-248, 2004

      3 정성창, "자사주 취득 기업들의 장기성과에 관한 연구" 한국재무학회 16 (16): 129-162, 2003

      4 Dittmar, A., "Why do firms repurchase stock" 73 : 331-355, 2000

      5 Oded, J., "Why do firms announce open-market repurchase programs" 18 : 271-300, 2005

      6 안병주, "What Drives Firms’ Financial Decisions? Evidence from the Field" 한국증권학회 40 (40): 219-260, 2011

      7 Jolls, C., "The role of incentive compensation in explaining the stock repurchase puzzle" Harvard Law School 1998

      8 Ikenberry, D, "Stock repurchases in Canada: performance and strategic trading" 55 : 2373-2397, 2000

      9 Masulis, R, "Stock repurchase by tender offer: An analysis of the causes of common stock price changes" 35 : 305-318, 1980

      10 Bagwell, L. S, "Share repurchase and takeover deterrence" 22 : 72-88, 1991

      11 Vermaelen, T, "Repurchase tender offers, signaling, and market signaling: An incentives" 19 : 163-181, 1984

      12 Brav, A, "Payout policy in the 21st century" 77 : 483-527, 2005

      13 Fried, J. M, "Open market repurchase: Signaling or managerial opportunism" 2 : 856-894, 2001

      14 Ikenberry, D, "Market underreaction to open market share repurchase" 39 : 181-208, 1995

      15 Hou, K, "Market Frictions, price delay, and the crosssection of expected returns" 18 : 981-1020, 2005

      16 Mitchell, M. L, "Managerial decisions and long-term stock price performance" 73 : 287-329, 2000

      17 Brav, A., "Is the abnormal return following equity issuances anomalous" 56 : 209-249, 2000

      18 Kalay, A, "Is Chapter 11 costly" 84 : 772-796, 2007

      19 안유화, "Is Accounting Information Quality Priced in the Korean Markets?" 한국증권학회 39 (39): 133-159, 2010

      20 Brav, A, "Inference in long-horizon event studies: A bayesian approach with application to initial public offerings" 55 : 1791-1821, 2000

      21 Lyon, D. J., "Improved methods for tests of longrun abnormal stock return" 54 : 165-201, 1999

      22 Kim, S, "How does the announcement of share retirement affect firm value" 18 : 107-133, 2005

      23 Jagannathan, M., "Financial flexibility and the choice between dividends and stock repurchases" 57 : 355-384, 2000

      24 Grullon, G., "Dividends, share repurchases, and substitution hypothesis" 57 : 1649-1684, 2002

      25 Hong, H, "Differences of opinion, short-sales constraints and market crashes," 16 : 487-525, 2003

      26 Bhattacharya, U, "Costless versus costly signaling: Theory and evidence, SSRN Working Paper Series" 2008

      27 Fenn, G. W, "Corporate financial policy and management stock incentives" 60 : 45-72, 2001

      28 Vermaelen, T., "Common stock repurchases and market signaling: An empirical study" 9 : 139-183, 1981

      29 Farrell, J, "Cheap talk" 10 : 103-118, 1996

      30 Almazan, A, "Attracting attention: Cheap managerial talk and costly market monitoring" 63 : 1399-1436, 2008

      31 Jensen, M. C, "Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers" 79 : 323-329, 1986

      32 Stephen, C, "Actual reacquisitions in open-market repurchase programs" 53 : 313-333, 1998

      33 Crawford, V, "A survey of experiments on communication via cheap talk" 78 : 286-298, 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-06-28 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Financial Studies -> Korean Journal of Financial Studies KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.06 1.06 0.98
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.06 1.22 2.132 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼