RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    고대 영지주의 사상의 관점에서 바라본 요한복음 6장의 ‘살’(σάρξ) = The ‘Flesh’(σάρξ) in John 6 in the light of Ancient Gnostic Ideas

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104978311

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    John 6 contains the summary of the Gospel of John in the aspects of a religious, theological, and structural riddle. Whenever one tries to explain John chapter 6 in the various traditions, one can eventually discover an inconsistency between 6:51-56 and 6:63. In particular, John 6:53 states, “unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves.” In John 6:51-59, whether one interprets the flesh as a spiritual flesh, bread, or Logos (word), the following passage presents another problem ― “It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail” (John 6:63b) ― because the verse evidently differentiates spirit from flesh and supports strong Gnostic characteristics.
    As Bultmann suggested, the geographical information provides that all events and discourse in 6:1-71 happened around Capernaum, which supports literally coherence of the structure of John 6. In order to avoid some misunderstanding of gnosticism, one distinguishes ancient gnostic ideas that have existed before Christianity from 2nd century gnosticism. Gnostic ideas are difficult to define, but their core elements are ‘the theology of Monad’ and ‘the journey of soul’. By using these, one can find two understandings of “flesh” in John: one is Dionysiac doceticism and another is an ancient gnostic idea. In this regard, Menken interprets John 6:51C-58 as “an anti-docetic Christology” in which real consumption of flesh and blood indicates Jesus’ real humanity. However, John’s flesh cannot be explained without the gnostic feature here. From the prologue of John (1:1-18), thus, one can easily find the same notion of Monad just appears in Eugnostos the Blessed and The Sophia of Jesus Christ. In addition, the Gospel of John and the Gospel of Thomas share similar thought from the feature of ancient gnostic ideas. Because the Gospel of John makes dialogues with many traditions such as the cult of Dionysus, gnostic ideas, doceticism, and anti-doceticism, John 6 reflects diffe- rent interpretations of the flesh at the same time. In general, John presents two kinds of flesh in his Gospel. Because of dominant gnostic features throughout the Gospel of John, one can not object that Jesus’ flesh and blood have spiritual elements, and humans’ flesh does not have spirit. Humans’ flesh cannot inherit the Kingdom of God, but Jesus’ flesh gives spirituality because “the Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14).
    번역하기

    John 6 contains the summary of the Gospel of John in the aspects of a religious, theological, and structural riddle. Whenever one tries to explain John chapter 6 in the various traditions, one can eventually discover an inconsistency between 6:51-56 a...

    John 6 contains the summary of the Gospel of John in the aspects of a religious, theological, and structural riddle. Whenever one tries to explain John chapter 6 in the various traditions, one can eventually discover an inconsistency between 6:51-56 and 6:63. In particular, John 6:53 states, “unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves.” In John 6:51-59, whether one interprets the flesh as a spiritual flesh, bread, or Logos (word), the following passage presents another problem ― “It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail” (John 6:63b) ― because the verse evidently differentiates spirit from flesh and supports strong Gnostic characteristics.
    As Bultmann suggested, the geographical information provides that all events and discourse in 6:1-71 happened around Capernaum, which supports literally coherence of the structure of John 6. In order to avoid some misunderstanding of gnosticism, one distinguishes ancient gnostic ideas that have existed before Christianity from 2nd century gnosticism. Gnostic ideas are difficult to define, but their core elements are ‘the theology of Monad’ and ‘the journey of soul’. By using these, one can find two understandings of “flesh” in John: one is Dionysiac doceticism and another is an ancient gnostic idea. In this regard, Menken interprets John 6:51C-58 as “an anti-docetic Christology” in which real consumption of flesh and blood indicates Jesus’ real humanity. However, John’s flesh cannot be explained without the gnostic feature here. From the prologue of John (1:1-18), thus, one can easily find the same notion of Monad just appears in Eugnostos the Blessed and The Sophia of Jesus Christ. In addition, the Gospel of John and the Gospel of Thomas share similar thought from the feature of ancient gnostic ideas. Because the Gospel of John makes dialogues with many traditions such as the cult of Dionysus, gnostic ideas, doceticism, and anti-doceticism, John 6 reflects diffe- rent interpretations of the flesh at the same time. In general, John presents two kinds of flesh in his Gospel. Because of dominant gnostic features throughout the Gospel of John, one can not object that Jesus’ flesh and blood have spiritual elements, and humans’ flesh does not have spirit. Humans’ flesh cannot inherit the Kingdom of God, but Jesus’ flesh gives spirituality because “the Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14).

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 부르스, F. F, "요한복음 1" 로고스 2009

    2 송순열, "영지주의의 현대적 의미 ― 개념과 분류의 재구성을 위하여" 한신신학연구소 50 (50): 35-61, 2013

    3 조재형, "영지사상에서 살펴본 고린도후서에 나오는 바울의 적대자" 한국신약학회 20 (20): 443-478, 2013

    4 황성규, "신약성서와 영지주의 J. Munck와 R. P. Casey를 중심으로" 20 : 143-156, 1974

    5 조재형, "디오니소스의 제의를 통해서 본 요한복음서의 성찬(요 6:51-59)" 한국기독교학회 (88) : 33-58, 2013

    6 최병수, "도마복음의 실현된 종말론" 55 : 76-126, 2009

    7 King, Karen L., "What is Gnosticism?" Belknap Press 2003

    8 Riley, Gregory J., "The River of God: A New History of Christian Origins" HaperCollins Publishers 2001

    9 Robinson, James M., "The Nag Hammadi Library" Harper & Row 1988

    10 Schmithals, Walter, "The Gospel of John: A Commentary by Rudolf Bultmann" The Westminster Press 1971

    1 부르스, F. F, "요한복음 1" 로고스 2009

    2 송순열, "영지주의의 현대적 의미 ― 개념과 분류의 재구성을 위하여" 한신신학연구소 50 (50): 35-61, 2013

    3 조재형, "영지사상에서 살펴본 고린도후서에 나오는 바울의 적대자" 한국신약학회 20 (20): 443-478, 2013

    4 황성규, "신약성서와 영지주의 J. Munck와 R. P. Casey를 중심으로" 20 : 143-156, 1974

    5 조재형, "디오니소스의 제의를 통해서 본 요한복음서의 성찬(요 6:51-59)" 한국기독교학회 (88) : 33-58, 2013

    6 최병수, "도마복음의 실현된 종말론" 55 : 76-126, 2009

    7 King, Karen L., "What is Gnosticism?" Belknap Press 2003

    8 Riley, Gregory J., "The River of God: A New History of Christian Origins" HaperCollins Publishers 2001

    9 Robinson, James M., "The Nag Hammadi Library" Harper & Row 1988

    10 Schmithals, Walter, "The Gospel of John: A Commentary by Rudolf Bultmann" The Westminster Press 1971

    11 Bultmann, Rudolf Karl, "The Gospel of John: A Commentary" Westminster 1971

    12 Guillaumont, A., "The Gospel According to Thomas" E. J. Brill and Harper & Brothers 1959

    13 Pagels, Elaine, "The Gnostic Gospels" Vintage Books 1989

    14 Krodel, Gerhard, "John 6:63" 37 (37): 283-288, 1983

    15 Haenchen, Ernst, "John 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of John Chapters 1-6" Fortress Press 1984

    16 Cho, Jae Hyung, "Johanine Eucharist in the Light of Greco ‚ Roman Religion" Claremont Graduate University 2010

    17 Ménard, Jacques E., "Jewish and Christian Self- Definition: The Shaping of Christianity in the Second and Third Centuries" Fortress Press 1980

    18 Need, Stephen W., "Jesus the Bread of God: The Eucharist as Metaphor in John 6" 105 (105): 194-200, 2002

    19 Fideler, David, "Jesus Christ Sun of God: Ancient Cosmology and Early Christian Symbolism" The Theosophical Publishing House 1993

    20 Koester, Helmut, "Introduction to the New Testament: History, and Literature of Early Christianity" Walter de Gruyter 1982

    21 Riley, Gregory J., "I Was Thought to Be What I Am Not: Docetic Jesus and the Johannine Tradition" Institute for Antiquity and Christianity 1994

    22 Ferm, Vergilius, "Encyclopedia of Religion" Littlefield, Adams & Co 1959

    23 Richardson, Cyril C, "Early Church Father" Simon & Schuster Inc 1996

    24 Menken, Maarten J. J., "Critical Readings of John 6" Brill 1997

    25 Beutler, Johannes, "Critical Readings of John 6" Brill 1997

    26 Pearson, Birger A., "Ancient Gnosticism: Traditions and Literature" Fortress 2007

    27 Bauer, Walter, "A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature" The University of Chicago Press and The Syndics of the Cambridge University Press 1957

    28 Bernard, J. H., "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to St. John Volume I" T. & T. Clark 1985

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.57 0.57 0.53
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.52 0.51 0.592 0.26
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼