RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    정당지지 변동, 공천 실수, 그리고 단기비이양식 제도에서의 정부의 이점 = Partisan Swings, Nomination Errors, and the Government Advantage in SNTV

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60303459

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Previous literature has argued that governing parties are advantaged under SNTV because they use state resources to overcome the coordination problems created by the electoral system. Parties must anticipate the number of votes they will win, nominate an appropriate number of candidates, and then divide their votes among those nominees. Previous literature has focused on the latter two elements. This paper asks whether a superior ability to anticipate election results is part of the governing party`s advantage. Using data from all national and local SNTV elections in the democratic era in Taiwan, I find that the ability to turn votes into seats is correlated with previous election results, a pattern we would not expect to see if parties ignored everything but anticipated future results. Any change, whether support for the party increases or decreases, is associated with fewer victories than might otherwise be expected. There is no difference between governing and opposition parties, implying that predictive capacity is not a major element of the government`s advantage. However, this paper does uncover the mechanics of this advantage. Governing parties nominate more aggressively, but, unlike for opposition parties, excess nominees do not cause lower than expected numbers of victories for governing parties.
    번역하기

    Previous literature has argued that governing parties are advantaged under SNTV because they use state resources to overcome the coordination problems created by the electoral system. Parties must anticipate the number of votes they will win, nominate...

    Previous literature has argued that governing parties are advantaged under SNTV because they use state resources to overcome the coordination problems created by the electoral system. Parties must anticipate the number of votes they will win, nominate an appropriate number of candidates, and then divide their votes among those nominees. Previous literature has focused on the latter two elements. This paper asks whether a superior ability to anticipate election results is part of the governing party`s advantage. Using data from all national and local SNTV elections in the democratic era in Taiwan, I find that the ability to turn votes into seats is correlated with previous election results, a pattern we would not expect to see if parties ignored everything but anticipated future results. Any change, whether support for the party increases or decreases, is associated with fewer victories than might otherwise be expected. There is no difference between governing and opposition parties, implying that predictive capacity is not a major element of the government`s advantage. However, this paper does uncover the mechanics of this advantage. Governing parties nominate more aggressively, but, unlike for opposition parties, excess nominees do not cause lower than expected numbers of victories for governing parties.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼