RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    근로연계복지정책 효과와 전달체계 성격에 관한 연구: 미국 TANF와 영국 New Deal의 사례연구 = A Study on the Effectiveness and Characteristics of Delivery system in Welfare-to-Work Programs: the Cases of the TANF in U.S. and the New Deal in U.K.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99845381

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is the case study to explore the characteristics and the effectiveness of welfare-to-work delivery system in the U.K. and the U.S. This study analyzes the TANF policy in the U.S. and the New Deal for lone parents policy in the U.K. The results are as such: Firstly, in the U.K., the central government integrated the delivery system of the Income Support program into that of the employment program. However, in the U.S., the state government integrated the delivery system of the AFDC program into that of the employment program. The U.K. government supported the local labor market partnerships and they usually provided the basic job skills for all the welfare recipients. However, in the U.S., state government provided the job training programs just welfare recipients to whom personal advisors refer. The difference of the delivery system in the welfare-to-work policy leads to the difference of effectiveness, especially long-term effectiveness. That is because TANF effectiveness has reduced due to the changes of the unemployment rate in the labor market. Based on the results, this study suggests the policy implications for the delivery system of Korean welfare-to-work policy which has expanded recently.
    번역하기

    This study is the case study to explore the characteristics and the effectiveness of welfare-to-work delivery system in the U.K. and the U.S. This study analyzes the TANF policy in the U.S. and the New Deal for lone parents policy in the U.K. The resu...

    This study is the case study to explore the characteristics and the effectiveness of welfare-to-work delivery system in the U.K. and the U.S. This study analyzes the TANF policy in the U.S. and the New Deal for lone parents policy in the U.K. The results are as such: Firstly, in the U.K., the central government integrated the delivery system of the Income Support program into that of the employment program. However, in the U.S., the state government integrated the delivery system of the AFDC program into that of the employment program. The U.K. government supported the local labor market partnerships and they usually provided the basic job skills for all the welfare recipients. However, in the U.S., state government provided the job training programs just welfare recipients to whom personal advisors refer. The difference of the delivery system in the welfare-to-work policy leads to the difference of effectiveness, especially long-term effectiveness. That is because TANF effectiveness has reduced due to the changes of the unemployment rate in the labor market. Based on the results, this study suggests the policy implications for the delivery system of Korean welfare-to-work policy which has expanded recently.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국 취업성공패키지"

    2 류기락, "취업성공패키지-희망리본프로젝트 통합․조정을 위한 운영성과 평가 및 개선방안" 경제․인문사회연구회, 한국직업능력개발원 2012

    3 박찬임, "취약계층 고용서비스 이용실태 및 서비스 강화방안" 한국노동연구원 2007

    4 고혜원, "지역의 학습․고용․복지서비스의 연계실태와 과제" 한국직업능력개발원 2008

    5 노대명, "자활정책․지원제도 개선방안 연구" 한국보건사회연구원, 한국노동연구원 2004

    6 국회예산정책처, "자활사업의 탈수급 효과 미흡, 특례제도의 실효성 저하 및 통계관리·평가체계의 통합성 결여 지적"

    7 "영국 고용연금부"

    8 김종일, "서구의 근로연계복지: 이론과 현실(아산재단 연구총서 제193집)" 집문당 2006

    9 이상일, "사회복지와 인적자원개발" 집문당 2011

    10 OECD, "미국의 공공고용촉진 서비스(The Public Employment Service in The United States)" 한국산업인력공단 2000

    1 "한국 취업성공패키지"

    2 류기락, "취업성공패키지-희망리본프로젝트 통합․조정을 위한 운영성과 평가 및 개선방안" 경제․인문사회연구회, 한국직업능력개발원 2012

    3 박찬임, "취약계층 고용서비스 이용실태 및 서비스 강화방안" 한국노동연구원 2007

    4 고혜원, "지역의 학습․고용․복지서비스의 연계실태와 과제" 한국직업능력개발원 2008

    5 노대명, "자활정책․지원제도 개선방안 연구" 한국보건사회연구원, 한국노동연구원 2004

    6 국회예산정책처, "자활사업의 탈수급 효과 미흡, 특례제도의 실효성 저하 및 통계관리·평가체계의 통합성 결여 지적"

    7 "영국 고용연금부"

    8 김종일, "서구의 근로연계복지: 이론과 현실(아산재단 연구총서 제193집)" 집문당 2006

    9 이상일, "사회복지와 인적자원개발" 집문당 2011

    10 OECD, "미국의 공공고용촉진 서비스(The Public Employment Service in The United States)" 한국산업인력공단 2000

    11 윤윤규, "미국의 고용․훈련서비스 전달체계 사례: 뉴욕주를 중심으로,일자리사업 전달체계의 현황 및 평가" 한국노동연구원 148-209, 2011

    12 이석원, "미국공적부조제도개혁의성공적인정책수단:메타 회귀분석을 통한 접근" 한국행정학회 36 (36): 205-225, 2002

    13 이상록, "미국 탈빈곤 정책의 동향과 쟁점 - TANF 프로그램의 동향과 성과에 대한 분석을 중심으로 -" 한국사회복지연구회 (31) : 243-284, 2006

    14 "미국 연방노동부 노동통계청"

    15 김환준, "미국 복지개혁의 성과와 한계" 한국사회복지학회 53 : 129-153, 2003

    16 "미국 경제조사청"

    17 "미국 Wisconsin주 아동가족부"

    18 노진귀, "독일 고용서비스의 개혁 및 실태, In 이행노동시장의 이해와 고용전략" 한국고용정보원 289-311, 2008

    19 임수경, "근로연계복지정책의 전달체계 성격에 관한 연구 - 영국 뉴딜정책(New Deal)의 파트너십전략을 중심으로 -" 한국사회복지연구회 42 (42): 71-96, 2011

    20 이현주, "공공부조정책 내용과 집행의 상호조응성 분석: TANF의 배경과 그 집행의 특징" 한국보건사회연구원 2011

    21 유길상, "고용서비스 전달체계의 발전 추세와 시사점-국의 사례를 중심으로" 한국사회보장학회 22 (22): 1-25, 2006

    22 김동헌, "고용서비스 개혁을 위한 정책방향과 과제" 한국노동연구원 8-25, 2008

    23 Lodemel, I, "Workfare, CESifo DICE Report" CESifo 2005

    24 The State of Wisconsin Department of Children and Families, "Wisconsin Works(W-2) and Related Programs Contract for the period January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2011"

    25 Grogger, J., "Welfare Reform: Effects of a Decade of Change" Harvard University Press 2005

    26 Mead, L. M, "Welfare Reform in Wisconsin: The Local Role" Institute for Research on Poverty 2001

    27 Swartz, R. J, "W-2 Achievements and Challenges: An Overview and Interpretation of the White Papers Commissioned by the Department fo Workforce Development" Institute for Research on Poverty 2001

    28 DWP, "Transforming Britain's labour market: Ten Years of the New Deal"

    29 Wikeley, Nick, "Training for Employment in the 1990s" 53 (53): 354-368, 2012

    30 Brodkin, E. Z., "Toward a Contractual Welfare State?”, “The Case of Work Activation in the United States, In Contractualism in Employment Services: A New Form of Welfare State Governance" Kluwer Law International 73-100, 2005

    31 Riley, R., "The introduction of JCP: An evaluation of labour market impacts" Department for Work and Pensions 2011

    32 Newman, J., "The double dynamics of activation: Institutions, citizens and the remaking of welfare governance" 27 : 364-375, 2007

    33 DWP, "The Social Security(Flexible New Deal) Regulation 2009(SI 2009 NO. 480)"

    34 Balducchi, D. E., "The Role of the Employment Service, Unemployment Insurance in the United States: Analysis of Policy Issues" W.E. Upjhon Institute for Employment Research 457-503, 1997

    35 Finn, D., "The Role of Contracts and the Private Sector in Delivering Britain's ‘Employment First’ Welfare State, In Contractualism in Employment Service: A New Form of Welfare Governance" Kluwer Law International 2005

    36 Berkel, R, V., "The Provision of Income Protection and Activation Services for the Unemployed in ‘Active’ Welfare State. An International Comparison" 39 (39): 17-34, 2009

    37 권혁창, "The Long-term Economic Outcomes of TANF Leavers: Evidence from Wisconsin" 한국사회복지정책학회 37 (37): 73-93, 2010

    38 Jessop, B., "The Changing Governance of Welfare: Recent Trends in its Primacy Functions, Scale, and Modes of Coordination" 33 (33): 348-359, 1999

    39 U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program(TANF); Final Rule"

    40 Wiseman, M., "State Strategies for Welfare Reform: The Wisconsin Story" 15 (15): 515-546, 1996

    41 Department for Education and Skills, "Skills for life: The national strategy for improving adult literacy and numeracy skills - Focus on delivery to 2007"

    42 Department for Education and Employment, "Skills for life: The national strategy for improving adult literacy and numeracy skills"

    43 Ehrle, J., "Recent Changes in Wisconsin Welfare and Work, Child Care, and Child Welfare Systems" The Urban Institute 2001

    44 DWP, "Ready for work: full employment in our generation"

    45 The RISE Steering Committee, "Pathways Across Wisconsin: The RISE Initiative-Launching Career Pathway Development in Wisconsin" 2007

    46 여유진, "OECD 국가 빈곤정책 동향분석" 한국보건사회연구원 2010

    47 Wiggan, J., "Mapping the Governance Reform of Welfare to Work in Britain Under New Labour" 32 : 1026-1047, 2009

    48 Seefeldt, K. S., "Income Support and Social Services for Low-Income People in Wisconsin" The Urban Institute 1998

    49 DWP, "In work, better off: next steps to full employment"

    50 U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, "ISIS Career Pathways Program Profile: Madison Area Technical College Patient Care Pathway Program"

    51 Kwon, H. C., "How do economic downturns affect welfare leavers? A comparison of two cohorts" 33 : 588-597, 2011

    52 Atkinson, I., "Governance structures and the devolved delivery of employment outcomes" DWP 2010

    53 Karagiannaki, E., "Exploring the effect of integrated benefit system and active labour market policies: Evidence from JCP in the UK" Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion(London School of Economics) 2006

    54 Hartfree, Y., "Experiencing Jobcentre Plus Pathfinders: Overview of Early Evaluation Evidence" The Department of Work and Pensions & Stephen Lissenburgh and Alan Marsh Policy Studies Institute 2003

    55 United States Government Printing Office, "Economic Report of the President" 2002

    56 United States Government Printing Office, "Economic Report of the President" 2003

    57 Joassart-Marcelli, P., "Does local access to employment services reduce unemployment? A GIS analysis of One-Stop Career Centers" 39 (39): 335-359, 2006

    58 Keller, J., "Delivery a work-focused service: final findings from ONE case studies and staff research" DWP 2002

    59 Trickey, H., "Comparing workfare programmes-features and implications, An Offer you can't refuse: workfare in international perspective" Policy press 2002

    60 Freedland, M., "Client Contractualism between the Employment Service and Jobseekers in the United Kingdom, In Contractualism in Employment Services: A New Form of Welfare State Governance" Kluwer Law International 119-138, 2005

    61 Hendra, R., "Breaking the low-pay, no-pay cycle: Final evidence from the UK Employment Retention and Advancement(ERA) demonstration" DWP 2011

    62 Lower-Basch, E., "Analysis of New Interim Final TANF Rules"

    63 고용노동부, "2013년 고용노동부 국정운영 보고" 2013

    64 고용노동부, "2012회계연도 예산․기금운용계획 개요" 2012

    65 고용노동부, "2012년판 고용노동백서" 2012

    66 고용노동부, "2012년도 주요업무 추진계획" 2011

    67 보건복지부, "2012년 자활사업 안내"

    68 보건복지부, "2012 주요업무 참고자료"

    69 보건복지부, "2010 보건복지백서" 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.05 1.05 1.02
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.1 1.15 1.323 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼