RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      A Comparison of Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon Electrocardiographic Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Korean Patients

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104685789

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background and Objectives: Electrocardiography (ECG) is a cost-effective and useful method for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in a large-scale study or in clinical practice. Among ECG criteria, the Cornell product (Cor P) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria were adopt-ed by the European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines but have different performances among races.
      The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of two voltage criteria in Korean patients.
      Subjects and Methods: Electrocardiography and echocardiographic LV mass of 332 (159 male, 173 female) consecutive patients were analyzed. Cornell voltage criteria and the Cor P were compared with Sokolow-Lyon voltage (Sok V) and the Sokolow-Lyon product (Sok P).
      The sensitivities and specificities were estimated using a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve in relation to the LVH diagnosis.
      The sensitivities and revised cut-off values were derived at specificity levels of 90, 95, and 100%.
      Results: The Cornell-based criteria generally showed better performance than that of the Sok V criteria and Sok P in the area under the ROC curve analysis. The revised cut-off values for the Cornell voltage criteria (20 and 16 mm for males and females, respectively) showed an improved sensitivity (19.7 and 30.3% for males and females, respectively), with a high specificity of 95%.
      Conclusion: The Cornell-based criteria had better performance than that of the Sokolow-Lyon criteria in both Korean men and women.
      However, revised cut-off values are needed to improve accuracy.
      번역하기

      Background and Objectives: Electrocardiography (ECG) is a cost-effective and useful method for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in a large-scale study or in clinical practice. Among ECG criteria, the Cornell product (Cor P) and Sokolow-Ly...

      Background and Objectives: Electrocardiography (ECG) is a cost-effective and useful method for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in a large-scale study or in clinical practice. Among ECG criteria, the Cornell product (Cor P) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria were adopt-ed by the European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines but have different performances among races.
      The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of two voltage criteria in Korean patients.
      Subjects and Methods: Electrocardiography and echocardiographic LV mass of 332 (159 male, 173 female) consecutive patients were analyzed. Cornell voltage criteria and the Cor P were compared with Sokolow-Lyon voltage (Sok V) and the Sokolow-Lyon product (Sok P).
      The sensitivities and specificities were estimated using a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve in relation to the LVH diagnosis.
      The sensitivities and revised cut-off values were derived at specificity levels of 90, 95, and 100%.
      Results: The Cornell-based criteria generally showed better performance than that of the Sok V criteria and Sok P in the area under the ROC curve analysis. The revised cut-off values for the Cornell voltage criteria (20 and 16 mm for males and females, respectively) showed an improved sensitivity (19.7 and 30.3% for males and females, respectively), with a high specificity of 95%.
      Conclusion: The Cornell-based criteria had better performance than that of the Sokolow-Lyon criteria in both Korean men and women.
      However, revised cut-off values are needed to improve accuracy.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Sokolow M, "The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads" 37 : 161-186, 1949

      2 Hotelling H, "The selection of variates for use in prediction with some comments on the general problem of nuisance parameters" 11 : 271-283, 1940

      3 Bluemke DA, "The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) Study" 52 : 2148-2155, 2008

      4 Hense HW, "The associations of body size and body composition with left ventricular mass: impacts for indexation in adults" 32 : 451-457, 1998

      5 Pewsner D, "Ruling a diagnosis in or out with “SpPIn” and “SnNOut”: a note of caution" 329 : 209-213, 2004

      6 Rodrigues SL, "Revision of the Sokolow-Lyon-Rappaport and cornell voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy" 90 : 46-53, 2008

      7 Okin PM, "Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy by losartan versus atenolol: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study" 108 : 684-690, 2003

      8 Sahn DJ, "Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements" 58 : 1072-1083, 1978

      9 Lang RM, "Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology" 18 : 1440-1463, 2005

      10 Truong QA, "Performance of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy as compared with cardiac computed tomography: from the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography Trial" 28 : 1959-1967, 2010

      1 Sokolow M, "The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads" 37 : 161-186, 1949

      2 Hotelling H, "The selection of variates for use in prediction with some comments on the general problem of nuisance parameters" 11 : 271-283, 1940

      3 Bluemke DA, "The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) Study" 52 : 2148-2155, 2008

      4 Hense HW, "The associations of body size and body composition with left ventricular mass: impacts for indexation in adults" 32 : 451-457, 1998

      5 Pewsner D, "Ruling a diagnosis in or out with “SpPIn” and “SnNOut”: a note of caution" 329 : 209-213, 2004

      6 Rodrigues SL, "Revision of the Sokolow-Lyon-Rappaport and cornell voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy" 90 : 46-53, 2008

      7 Okin PM, "Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy by losartan versus atenolol: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study" 108 : 684-690, 2003

      8 Sahn DJ, "Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements" 58 : 1072-1083, 1978

      9 Lang RM, "Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology" 18 : 1440-1463, 2005

      10 Truong QA, "Performance of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy as compared with cardiac computed tomography: from the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography Trial" 28 : 1959-1967, 2010

      11 De Simone G, "Normalization for body size and population-attributable risk of left ventricular hypertrophy: the Strong Heart Study" 18 (18): 191-196, 2005

      12 Alfakih K, "New gender-specific partition values for ECG criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy: recalibration against cardiac MRI" 44 : 175-179, 2004

      13 Noble LM, "Left ventricular hypertrophy in left bundle branch block" 17 : 157-160, 1984

      14 Casale PN, "Improved sex-specific criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy for clinical and computer interpretation of electrocardiograms: validation with autopsy findings" 75 : 565-572, 1987

      15 Schillaci G, "Improved electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy" 74 : 714-719, 1994

      16 Barrios V, "Gender differences in the diagnosis and treatment of left ventricular hypertrophy detected by different electrocardiographic criteria: findings from the SARA Study" 25 : 51-56, 2010

      17 Okin PM, "Ethnic differences in electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE Study. Losartan Intervention For Endpoint" 15 : 663-671, 2002

      18 Lee YW, "Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy by scoring system" 7 : 1-8, 1977

      19 Casale PN, "Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: development and prospective validation of improved criteria" 6 : 572-580, 1985

      20 Devereux RB, "Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy using echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass as the reference standard. Comparison of standard criteria, computer diagnosis and physician interpretation" 3 : 82-87, 1984

      21 Molloy TJ, "Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by the simple QRS voltage-duration product" 20 : 1180-1186, 1992

      22 Devereux RB, "Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings" 57 : 450-458, 1986

      23 Sundström J, "Echocardiographic and electrocardiographic diagnoses of left ventricular hypertrophy predict mortality independently of each other in a population of elderly men" 103 : 2346-2351, 2001

      24 Xie L, "Correlation between echocardiographic left ventricular mass index and electrocardiographic variables used in left ventricular hypertrophy criteria in Chinese hypertensive patients" 51 : 391-401, 2010

      25 Verdecchia P, "Comparison of electrocardiographic criteria for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: the MAVI Study" 1 : 207-215, 2000

      26 Dahlöf B, "Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol" 359 : 995-1003, 2002

      27 Okin PM, "Baseline characteristics in relation to electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) in Hypertension Study. The Life Study Investigators" 36 : 766-773, 2000

      28 Pewsner D, "Accuracy of electrocardiography in diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension: systematic review" 335 : 711-, 2007

      29 Hancock EW, "AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology" 53 : 992-1002, 2009

      30 Mancia G, "2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)" 25 : 1105-1187, 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-05-15 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한순환기학회 -> 대한심장학회
      영문명 : The Korean Society Of Circulation -> The Korean Society of Cardiology
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-08-02 학술지등록 한글명 : Korean Circulation Journal
      외국어명 : Korean Circulation Journal
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.13 0.34 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.36 0.52 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼