RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    孔子와 Noddings를 통해 본 교육의 본래적인 관계

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100532683

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Nowadays, many people in the world pursue productivity and efficiency, but in doing so they lose more fundamental reason for life, worthwhile modes of behaviors and the authentic self. The purpose of this study is to explore ways in which authentic relationship is key to resolving the challenges faced by contemporary societies and education. This study uses Noddings’ theory to develop the criteria for authentic relationship. According to Noddings, relationship is essential to human existence and is foundational to realizing the true self. The four criteria for authentic relationship examined in this study are relationship as goal, respect for uniqueness of the individual, mutuality in relationship, and capacity to expand relationships.
    The study takes Confucius as an ideal model for the authentic relationship in educational practices. He tried to build relationships with their disciples prior to initiating them into certain knowledge. He strived to understand the position of each and every disciple with their whole heart and guided the disciples based on the distinctive need and potential of each individual. Furthermore, he did not try to offer their teachings unilaterally but rather valued the disciples’ will and reactions. Accompanied by his disciples throughout their entire lives, he set the example of building relationships, and the disciples took after them and formed sincere relationships while showing love for people and the world.
    The problem of today’s education is that there is a lack of serious reflection on what the goal is, whether it is desirable, and whether the means and processes to pursue that goal are appropriate. People’s attention is concentrated not on what the goal is, but on how effective they can be in achieving it. Amidst all the tests and competitions, teachers and students fail to have a serious introspection on what is truly important in education, what is truly needed for men and this society as well as a single unique individual, and how they shall work it out. As a result, they are faced with mental chaos, heteronomy, despondency, and disorientation.
    The most fundamental thing to do in order to overcome the aforementioned is to recover the humanity and authenticity of men, which can be achieved by cultivating an attitude of sincerity and respectfulness in relationships. To this end, it is important to foster an attitude of sincerity and respectfulness by building a direct, distinct, interactive, and expansive relationship, as shown in the examples set by Confucius, especially in teacher-student relationships.
    번역하기

    Nowadays, many people in the world pursue productivity and efficiency, but in doing so they lose more fundamental reason for life, worthwhile modes of behaviors and the authentic self. The purpose of this study is to explore ways in which authentic re...

    Nowadays, many people in the world pursue productivity and efficiency, but in doing so they lose more fundamental reason for life, worthwhile modes of behaviors and the authentic self. The purpose of this study is to explore ways in which authentic relationship is key to resolving the challenges faced by contemporary societies and education. This study uses Noddings’ theory to develop the criteria for authentic relationship. According to Noddings, relationship is essential to human existence and is foundational to realizing the true self. The four criteria for authentic relationship examined in this study are relationship as goal, respect for uniqueness of the individual, mutuality in relationship, and capacity to expand relationships.
    The study takes Confucius as an ideal model for the authentic relationship in educational practices. He tried to build relationships with their disciples prior to initiating them into certain knowledge. He strived to understand the position of each and every disciple with their whole heart and guided the disciples based on the distinctive need and potential of each individual. Furthermore, he did not try to offer their teachings unilaterally but rather valued the disciples’ will and reactions. Accompanied by his disciples throughout their entire lives, he set the example of building relationships, and the disciples took after them and formed sincere relationships while showing love for people and the world.
    The problem of today’s education is that there is a lack of serious reflection on what the goal is, whether it is desirable, and whether the means and processes to pursue that goal are appropriate. People’s attention is concentrated not on what the goal is, but on how effective they can be in achieving it. Amidst all the tests and competitions, teachers and students fail to have a serious introspection on what is truly important in education, what is truly needed for men and this society as well as a single unique individual, and how they shall work it out. As a result, they are faced with mental chaos, heteronomy, despondency, and disorientation.
    The most fundamental thing to do in order to overcome the aforementioned is to recover the humanity and authenticity of men, which can be achieved by cultivating an attitude of sincerity and respectfulness in relationships. To this end, it is important to foster an attitude of sincerity and respectfulness by building a direct, distinct, interactive, and expansive relationship, as shown in the examples set by Confucius, especially in teacher-student relationships.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "論語集註"

    2 "論語古今註"

    3 이숙인, "유교의 관계 윤리에 대한 여성주의적 해석" 한국여성학회 15 (15): 39-69, 1999

    4 목영해, "동서사상의 비교와 교육" 신라대학교 출판부 2003

    5 "與猶堂全書"

    6 "孔子世家"

    7 "大學"

    8 "史記"

    9 "仲尼弟子列傳"

    10 "中庸"

    1 "論語集註"

    2 "論語古今註"

    3 이숙인, "유교의 관계 윤리에 대한 여성주의적 해석" 한국여성학회 15 (15): 39-69, 1999

    4 목영해, "동서사상의 비교와 교육" 신라대학교 출판부 2003

    5 "與猶堂全書"

    6 "孔子世家"

    7 "大學"

    8 "史記"

    9 "仲尼弟子列傳"

    10 "中庸"

    11 Noddings, N, "Women and Evil" University of California Press 1989

    12 Hirst, P, "What is teaching" 3 (3): 5-18, 1971

    13 O'Donelle, A, "Unpredictability, transformation, and the pedagogical encounter: reflections on "what is effective' in education" 63 (63): 265-282, 2013

    14 Hansen, D, "Understanding students" 14 (14): 171-185, 1999

    15 HALL, D, "Thinking Through Confucius" State University of New York Press 1987

    16 Fingarette, H, "The music of humanity in the conversations of Confucius" 10 (10): 210-230, 1983

    17 Noddings, N, "The Maternal Factor: Two Paths to Morality" University of California Press 2010

    18 Noddings, N, "The Language of Care Ethics" 40 (40): 52-56, 2012

    19 Taylor, C, "The Ethics of Authenticity" Harvard University Press 1991

    20 Gilligan, C, "The Emergence of Morality in Young Children" University of Chicago Press

    21 Noddings, N, "The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education" Teachers College Press 1992

    22 Noddings, N, "Teaching Themes of Caring" 61 (61): 24-28, 1995

    23 Carr, W, "Philosophy and education" 38 (38): 55-73, 2004

    24 Wilson, J, "Philosophical Analysis and Education" Routledge and Kegan Paul 1965

    25 Freire, P, "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" Continuum 1970

    26 Shim, S.-H, "Jesus' and Confucius' Educational Philosophy on the Teacher- Student Relationship" Loyola University of Chicago 2006

    27 Buber, M, "I and Thou" Charles Scribner's Sons 1958

    28 CHEN, J. P, "Confucius as a Teacher" Foreign Language Press 1990

    29 Creel, H.G, "Confucius and the Chinese Way" Harper and Row 1949

    30 Noddings, N, "Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education" University of California Press 2003

    31 Buber, M, "Between Man and Man" MacMillan 1965

    32 Heidegger, M, "Being and Time. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson" Harper & Row 1962

    33 MacIntyre, A, "After Virtue. Notre Dame" University of Notre Dame Press 1981

    34 Shim, S.-H, "A Philosophical Investigation of the Role of Teachers: A Synthesis of Plato, Confucius, Buber and Freire" 24 (24): 515-535, 2008

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-09-26 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Educational Idea Association -> The Korean Association of Educational Ideas KCI등재
    2022-06-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of Educational Idea -> The Korean Journal of Educational Ideas KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-04-06 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국교육사상연구회 -> 한국교육사상학회
    영문명 : The Korean Society For Study Of Educational Idea -> Korean Educational Idea Association
    KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.57
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.52 0.55 0.89 0.46
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼