RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      오래된 미래: 조선 삼사 (三司)의 하향적 동료성(top-down Collegiality)에 기반한 재해석 = An Old Future: Reinterpreting Joseon Samsa Institutions through Max Weber’s Concept of Collegiality

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110251261

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study takes Max Weber’s concept of collegiality as a theoretical point of departure and reinterprets the Samsa—the Joseon dynasty’s key institutions of political oversight composed of the Office of the Inspector General (Saheonbu), the Office of the Censor-General (Saganwon), and the Office of Special Counsel (Hongmungwan)—as collegial organizations designed to mitigate the risks inherent in modern bureaucracy. While modern bureaucracy has enhanced administrative efficiency and predictability, it also entails structural pathologies whereby instrumental rationality increasingly dominates, systematically eroding individual judgment and responsibility. Weber proposed collegiality as an organizational principle capable of counterbalancing these dangers of bureaucratic domination.
      This study argues that the Joseon Samsa functioned as more than mere institutions of surveillance and remonstrance. Rather, they institutionally embodied a collegial organizational logic that constrained the unilateral dominance of both the supreme decision-maker and the centralized bureaucratic apparatus, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of policy judgment. The analysis demonstrates that the Samsa satisfied the core criteria of collegial organizations, including judgment grounded in theoretical knowledge, the institutionalization of professional career trajectories, relative internal equality and autonomy, mutual monitoring and self-discipline, and collective decision-making. These findings indicate that the institutional status and symbolic as well as career-related privileges granted to Samsa officials were not incidental but constituted core governing functions explicitly recognized and promoted by the state. Accordingly, the Joseon Samsa can be reinterpreted not merely as a historical relic, but as an “old future” that offers meaningful insights for addressing the pathologies of contemporary bureaucracy.
      번역하기

      This study takes Max Weber’s concept of collegiality as a theoretical point of departure and reinterprets the Samsa—the Joseon dynasty’s key institutions of political oversight composed of the Office of the Inspector General (Saheonbu), the Offi...

      This study takes Max Weber’s concept of collegiality as a theoretical point of departure and reinterprets the Samsa—the Joseon dynasty’s key institutions of political oversight composed of the Office of the Inspector General (Saheonbu), the Office of the Censor-General (Saganwon), and the Office of Special Counsel (Hongmungwan)—as collegial organizations designed to mitigate the risks inherent in modern bureaucracy. While modern bureaucracy has enhanced administrative efficiency and predictability, it also entails structural pathologies whereby instrumental rationality increasingly dominates, systematically eroding individual judgment and responsibility. Weber proposed collegiality as an organizational principle capable of counterbalancing these dangers of bureaucratic domination.
      This study argues that the Joseon Samsa functioned as more than mere institutions of surveillance and remonstrance. Rather, they institutionally embodied a collegial organizational logic that constrained the unilateral dominance of both the supreme decision-maker and the centralized bureaucratic apparatus, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of policy judgment. The analysis demonstrates that the Samsa satisfied the core criteria of collegial organizations, including judgment grounded in theoretical knowledge, the institutionalization of professional career trajectories, relative internal equality and autonomy, mutual monitoring and self-discipline, and collective decision-making. These findings indicate that the institutional status and symbolic as well as career-related privileges granted to Samsa officials were not incidental but constituted core governing functions explicitly recognized and promoted by the state. Accordingly, the Joseon Samsa can be reinterpreted not merely as a historical relic, but as an “old future” that offers meaningful insights for addressing the pathologies of contemporary bureaucracy.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼