This study takes Max Weber’s concept of collegiality as a theoretical point of departure and reinterprets the Samsa—the Joseon dynasty’s key institutions of political oversight composed of the Office of the Inspector General (Saheonbu), the Offi...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study takes Max Weber’s concept of collegiality as a theoretical point of departure and reinterprets the Samsa—the Joseon dynasty’s key institutions of political oversight composed of the Office of the Inspector General (Saheonbu), the Offi...
This study takes Max Weber’s concept of collegiality as a theoretical point of departure and reinterprets the Samsa—the Joseon dynasty’s key institutions of political oversight composed of the Office of the Inspector General (Saheonbu), the Office of the Censor-General (Saganwon), and the Office of Special Counsel (Hongmungwan)—as collegial organizations designed to mitigate the risks inherent in modern bureaucracy. While modern bureaucracy has enhanced administrative efficiency and predictability, it also entails structural pathologies whereby instrumental rationality increasingly dominates, systematically eroding individual judgment and responsibility. Weber proposed collegiality as an organizational principle capable of counterbalancing these dangers of bureaucratic domination.
This study argues that the Joseon Samsa functioned as more than mere institutions of surveillance and remonstrance. Rather, they institutionally embodied a collegial organizational logic that constrained the unilateral dominance of both the supreme decision-maker and the centralized bureaucratic apparatus, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of policy judgment. The analysis demonstrates that the Samsa satisfied the core criteria of collegial organizations, including judgment grounded in theoretical knowledge, the institutionalization of professional career trajectories, relative internal equality and autonomy, mutual monitoring and self-discipline, and collective decision-making. These findings indicate that the institutional status and symbolic as well as career-related privileges granted to Samsa officials were not incidental but constituted core governing functions explicitly recognized and promoted by the state. Accordingly, the Joseon Samsa can be reinterpreted not merely as a historical relic, but as an “old future” that offers meaningful insights for addressing the pathologies of contemporary bureaucracy.
새마을운동에 참여한 중앙정부 관료의 역할 인식: 근거이론방법을 활용한 질적 분석
서울대 10개 만들기와 글로컬대학 30: 대학 체제 재편 없는 선택과 집중의 상징정치와 구조적 한계
점수의 불일치는 왜 발생하는가: 가중치 성향과 예비타당성조사 평가
근대이행기의 정치행정가 김옥균의국정개혁 실천에 관한 연구