RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SSCI

      Evolving the university language policy from the lens of the administrators: Language beliefs and practices of university administrators in the Philippines

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105917804

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Evolving a language policy for an institution requires careful formulation involving stakeholders which usually include the administrators, students, staff, and the community. In the Philippines where the top-down approach is the usual practice in developing a policy, the school administrators usually take an active role in the process. The language beliefs and practices of university administrators are determined to identify the language to be used for policy-making. Using Horwitz’s Beliefs About Language Learning Inventory (BALLI) and interview protocols as tools, the investigation explored the experiences of the university administrators at home and in the workplace. Findings reveal that among the languages used, English is still the preferred language for the workplace, especially the classrooms. Premium placed on the English language is evident in most of the participants. The use of the English language, however, was limited only to students and teachers; the practices reveal that administrators prefer the first language to English when communicating with the staff. Discussion of findings and implications for language use and language policy are provided.
      번역하기

      Evolving a language policy for an institution requires careful formulation involving stakeholders which usually include the administrators, students, staff, and the community. In the Philippines where the top-down approach is the usual practice in dev...

      Evolving a language policy for an institution requires careful formulation involving stakeholders which usually include the administrators, students, staff, and the community. In the Philippines where the top-down approach is the usual practice in developing a policy, the school administrators usually take an active role in the process. The language beliefs and practices of university administrators are determined to identify the language to be used for policy-making. Using Horwitz’s Beliefs About Language Learning Inventory (BALLI) and interview protocols as tools, the investigation explored the experiences of the university administrators at home and in the workplace. Findings reveal that among the languages used, English is still the preferred language for the workplace, especially the classrooms. Premium placed on the English language is evident in most of the participants. The use of the English language, however, was limited only to students and teachers; the practices reveal that administrators prefer the first language to English when communicating with the staff. Discussion of findings and implications for language use and language policy are provided.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Harwati, L., "Will English coexist with the Indonesian language?" 61 (61): 41-51, 2012

      2 Camilla J. Vinzconde, "When language use doesn’t see eye to eye: Language practices of teachers and students in a Philippine comprehensive university" 한국교육개발원 8 (8): 123-141, 2011

      3 Bargh, J., "The unconscious mind" 3 (3): 73-79, 2008

      4 Packer, M., "The science of qualitative research" Cambridge University Press 2011

      5 Chang, B., "The roles of English language education in the Asian context" 15 (15): 191-206, 2011

      6 Cunanan, B., "The language profile and attitudes of the administrators, faculty members, personnel, and students of a Philippine state university : Implications for language policy formulation" 1 (1): 135-166, 2013

      7 ASEAN, "The ASEAN Charter"

      8 Davis, A., "Teacher’s and student’s beliefs regarding the aspect of language learning" 17 (17): 207-222, 2003

      9 Baldauf Jr., R. B., "Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context" 7 (7): 147-170, 2010

      10 Karabenick, S., "Professional development implications of teachers’ beliefs and attitudes toward English language learners" 28 (28): 55-75, 2004

      1 Harwati, L., "Will English coexist with the Indonesian language?" 61 (61): 41-51, 2012

      2 Camilla J. Vinzconde, "When language use doesn’t see eye to eye: Language practices of teachers and students in a Philippine comprehensive university" 한국교육개발원 8 (8): 123-141, 2011

      3 Bargh, J., "The unconscious mind" 3 (3): 73-79, 2008

      4 Packer, M., "The science of qualitative research" Cambridge University Press 2011

      5 Chang, B., "The roles of English language education in the Asian context" 15 (15): 191-206, 2011

      6 Cunanan, B., "The language profile and attitudes of the administrators, faculty members, personnel, and students of a Philippine state university : Implications for language policy formulation" 1 (1): 135-166, 2013

      7 ASEAN, "The ASEAN Charter"

      8 Davis, A., "Teacher’s and student’s beliefs regarding the aspect of language learning" 17 (17): 207-222, 2003

      9 Baldauf Jr., R. B., "Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context" 7 (7): 147-170, 2010

      10 Karabenick, S., "Professional development implications of teachers’ beliefs and attitudes toward English language learners" 28 (28): 55-75, 2004

      11 Smith, M., "Practical research and evaluation: A start-to-finish guide for practitioners" SAGE publications 111-126, 2010

      12 Bernardo, A., "Philippine English: Linguistic and literary" Hong Kong University Press 29-48, 2008

      13 Johnson, D., "Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policy makers" Taylor and Francis 13-31, 2010

      14 Tollefson, J., "Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda?" Lawrence Erbaum Associates 283-294, 2004

      15 Mansoor, S., "Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda?" Lawrence Erbaum Associates 53-76, 2004

      16 Polat, N., "Matches in beliefs between teachers and students, and success in L2attainment : The Georgian example" 42 (42): 229-249, 2009

      17 Tupas, T. R., "Language, nation and development in Southeast Asia" Institute of Southeast Asian Studies 17-38, 2007

      18 Spolsky, B., "Language policy" Cambridge University 2004

      19 Ng, P., "Language planning in action: Singapore’s multilingual and bilingual policy"

      20 Ministry of Human Resource Development, "Language education"

      21 Bernat, E., "Investigating Vietnamese ESL learners’ beliefs about language learning" 21 (21): 40-54, 2004

      22 Baldauf Jr., R. B, "Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 957-970, 2005

      23 Floris, F., "Exploring teachers’ beliefs on the teaching of English in English language courses in Indonesia" 11 : 4-23, 2013

      24 Horwitz, E., "Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning : A review of BALLI studies" 27 (27): 557-576, 1999

      25 Maldonado-Valentin, M., "An exploration of the effects of the language policy in education in a contemporary Puerto Rican society" 24 (24): 1-20, 2016

      26 Harrison, M., "A century of changing language beliefs in Alsace" 20 (20): 357-374, 2012

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      학술지등록 한글명 : KEDI Journal of Educational Policy
      외국어명 : KEDI Journal of Educational Policy
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재 탈락 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2007-01-01 평가 SSCI 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.1 0.12 0.28 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼