RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      기술경영 교육만족도, 학습향상도, 현업적용도와 교육 순 추천지수(NPS) 간의 구조적 관계 분석 = An analysis of the structural relation equation on Technology Management Training Satisfaction, Learning Increase and Interaction between On-the-Job Application and Training NPS

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106487765

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      As a part of increasing worker productivity, a variety of scientific training and capability development methods are experimented and implemented by many training managers. However, despite a lot of efforts by training managers, decision makers on a corporate management level are still skeptical about the values training programs are designed to offer and tend to insist on providing verified supporting data about the program outcome. Hence, to get sustaining acknowledgement and support from trainees a training program in both private and public sectors must be thoroughly designed, especially in today's low-growth economy. Therefore this study tries to help training managers understand a new training trend that a training program must go beyond just achieving training satisfaction goals and must be valuable enough to be continuously recommended to trainees' colleagues. Using the training outcome methodology, this study also tries to offer a method to verify training investment values and provide relevant information. To achieve the above goals, this study first describes the goals and necessity of training outcome researches, and secondly introduces a theory on training outcome measurement and thirdly discusses a newly added training outcome measurement method. To wrap up the discussion, this study empirically verifies the validity of the suggested measurement method by offering applied cases and proposes insights and limitations of the study. Major study results are represented by 7 hypotheses and structural relation equations. Correlation between on-the-job application and training NPS shows significance only by superiors' assessment after 30 days from training course completion. Training satisfaction seems to be determined by the capability levels of both trainers and trainees. Training satisfaction shows significance in relationship with both a trainee and his superior's training NPSs 30 days after training completion. It also shows that a trainee's current capability level has no relationship with the trainee's learning achievement revealing that particular organization unit doesn't have a capability-fit training program at all. Hence based on this study's author's own experience, almost all other organizations have a similar problem too. Lastly, a confirmable factor analysis on 23 questions designed to measure training outcomes shows the outcomes are categorized into 4 factors: trainee's self-worthiness, customized training support, training satisfaction and superior's self-worthiness. And these factors are connected with each other by a structured relationship between a trainees's training NPSs after 30 days from training completion and on-the-job application levels after 30 days from training completion. Hence, this study proposes a methodology on how to accurately measure training outcomes especially in a low-growth economy environment. Also this study offers a meaningful value in that training managers can verify training investment values through training outcome measurement methods using training NPSs. However, this study has several limitations in that it studies only one training aspect in one organizational unit and doesn't conduct a long-term research on training outcome. Hence this study calls for more follow-up researches.
      번역하기

      As a part of increasing worker productivity, a variety of scientific training and capability development methods are experimented and implemented by many training managers. However, despite a lot of efforts by training managers, decision makers on a c...

      As a part of increasing worker productivity, a variety of scientific training and capability development methods are experimented and implemented by many training managers. However, despite a lot of efforts by training managers, decision makers on a corporate management level are still skeptical about the values training programs are designed to offer and tend to insist on providing verified supporting data about the program outcome. Hence, to get sustaining acknowledgement and support from trainees a training program in both private and public sectors must be thoroughly designed, especially in today's low-growth economy. Therefore this study tries to help training managers understand a new training trend that a training program must go beyond just achieving training satisfaction goals and must be valuable enough to be continuously recommended to trainees' colleagues. Using the training outcome methodology, this study also tries to offer a method to verify training investment values and provide relevant information. To achieve the above goals, this study first describes the goals and necessity of training outcome researches, and secondly introduces a theory on training outcome measurement and thirdly discusses a newly added training outcome measurement method. To wrap up the discussion, this study empirically verifies the validity of the suggested measurement method by offering applied cases and proposes insights and limitations of the study. Major study results are represented by 7 hypotheses and structural relation equations. Correlation between on-the-job application and training NPS shows significance only by superiors' assessment after 30 days from training course completion. Training satisfaction seems to be determined by the capability levels of both trainers and trainees. Training satisfaction shows significance in relationship with both a trainee and his superior's training NPSs 30 days after training completion. It also shows that a trainee's current capability level has no relationship with the trainee's learning achievement revealing that particular organization unit doesn't have a capability-fit training program at all. Hence based on this study's author's own experience, almost all other organizations have a similar problem too. Lastly, a confirmable factor analysis on 23 questions designed to measure training outcomes shows the outcomes are categorized into 4 factors: trainee's self-worthiness, customized training support, training satisfaction and superior's self-worthiness. And these factors are connected with each other by a structured relationship between a trainees's training NPSs after 30 days from training completion and on-the-job application levels after 30 days from training completion. Hence, this study proposes a methodology on how to accurately measure training outcomes especially in a low-growth economy environment. Also this study offers a meaningful value in that training managers can verify training investment values through training outcome measurement methods using training NPSs. However, this study has several limitations in that it studies only one training aspect in one organizational unit and doesn't conduct a long-term research on training outcome. Hence this study calls for more follow-up researches.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조병섭, "직무능력성취도 평가체계 개발을 위한 기초 연구" 교육부 한국전문대학교육협의회 2014

      2 양성진, "조직의 감정소진 조절효과에 따른 서번트 리더십이 조직성과에 미치는 영향" 국가미래기술경영연구소 4 (4): 127-149, 2019

      3 강주선, "조직내 지식이전 프로세스의 영향요인과 인센티브의 조절효과에 관한 비교연구 - 비영리조직과 영리조직을 중심으로 -" 대한경영정보학회 32 (32): 259-287, 2013

      4 李島炯, "조직내 교육 훈련의 학습 및 전이 효과" 成均館大學校 大學院 1995

      5 최창환, "연구소 기술교육훈련 참여자의 학습전이와 영향요인" 서울대학교 대학원 2008

      6 Driscoll, M. P, "수업설계를 위한 학습심리학" 교육과학사 2002

      7 김진모, "농촌지도리더 교육프로그램의 학습전이와 전이풍토의 관계" 한국농·산업교육학회 38 (38): 27-52, 2006

      8 박윤희, "기업의 교육훈련 전이 제고 노력과 전이 촉진 및 저해요인에 관한 연구" 한국직업능력개발원 16 (16): 99-128, 2013

      9 정영애, "기업교육훈련 전이 영향요인에 관한 연구" 8 (8): 89-110, 2006

      10 이석준, "기업교육훈련 성과에 영향을 미치는 학습의 전이환경 변인에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 교육대학원 2001

      1 조병섭, "직무능력성취도 평가체계 개발을 위한 기초 연구" 교육부 한국전문대학교육협의회 2014

      2 양성진, "조직의 감정소진 조절효과에 따른 서번트 리더십이 조직성과에 미치는 영향" 국가미래기술경영연구소 4 (4): 127-149, 2019

      3 강주선, "조직내 지식이전 프로세스의 영향요인과 인센티브의 조절효과에 관한 비교연구 - 비영리조직과 영리조직을 중심으로 -" 대한경영정보학회 32 (32): 259-287, 2013

      4 李島炯, "조직내 교육 훈련의 학습 및 전이 효과" 成均館大學校 大學院 1995

      5 최창환, "연구소 기술교육훈련 참여자의 학습전이와 영향요인" 서울대학교 대학원 2008

      6 Driscoll, M. P, "수업설계를 위한 학습심리학" 교육과학사 2002

      7 김진모, "농촌지도리더 교육프로그램의 학습전이와 전이풍토의 관계" 한국농·산업교육학회 38 (38): 27-52, 2006

      8 박윤희, "기업의 교육훈련 전이 제고 노력과 전이 촉진 및 저해요인에 관한 연구" 한국직업능력개발원 16 (16): 99-128, 2013

      9 정영애, "기업교육훈련 전이 영향요인에 관한 연구" 8 (8): 89-110, 2006

      10 이석준, "기업교육훈련 성과에 영향을 미치는 학습의 전이환경 변인에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 교육대학원 2001

      11 금혜진, "기업교육 프로그램에서 자기효능감, 초인지,학업성취도, 전이풍토와 학습의 근전이(near transfer) 및 원전이(far transfer)간의 관계 규명" 한국교육공학회 23 (23): 1-30, 2007

      12 주영주, "기업 사이버교육생의 학습전이 영향 변인 측정도구 개발 및 양호성 검증" 한국직업능력개발원 11 (11): 121-141, 2008

      13 박영용, "기업 리더십교육 프로그램 참여자의 학습전이와 영향요인" 서울대학교 대학원 2006

      14 이진화, "기업 리더 교육훈련의 근전이 및 원전이와 관련 변인 간의 인과적 모형" 서울대학교 대학원 2009

      15 이수경, "기업 e-러닝의 학습전이 사례연구: 국내 보험사의 직무교육을 중심으로" 한국교육정보미디어학회 16 (16): 45-69, 2010

      16 공민영, "기업 e-Learning 프로그램 참여자의 학습전이와 자기주도성, 전이풍토, 학습과의 관계" 서울대학교 대학원 2008

      17 임효창, "교육·훈련 프로그램 구성요소가 교육훈련 전이에 미치는 영향" 23 (23): 107-123, 1999

      18 김홍준, "경영통계학" 신광문화사 2009

      19 박희동, "경력 닻의 유형이 경력만족과 경력몰입에 미치는 영향 연구" 대한경영정보학회 31 (31): 97-116, 2012

      20 류지헌, "개념도를 활용한 협력적 문제해결 과제에서의 지식공유과정" 한국교육공학회 21 (21): 29-60, 2005

      21 金鎭模, "職務敎育訓鍊의 有效性과 그 影響要因" 서울大學校 大學院 1997

      22 "http://bbs.sisrnc.co.kr/tt/site/ttboard.cgi?act=read&db=board&idx=8"

      23 Clark, F. L., "Visual imagery and self-questioning: Strategies to improve comprehension of written 588 April 1986 materials" 17 (17): 145-149, 1986

      24 Travis K, "Use of Phillips's Five Level Training Evaluation and Return on Investment Nework in the U. S. non-profit sector" University of north TEXAS 2007

      25 Baldwin, T.T, "Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research" 41 (41): 1988

      26 Dana Gaines Robinson, "Training for Impact: How to Link Training to Business Needs and Measure the Results San Francisco" Jossey-Bass 1989

      27 Tannenbaum, S. I, "Training and development in work organizations" 43 : 399-441, 1992

      28 Yamnill, S, "Theories supporting transfer of training" 12 (12): 195-208, 2001

      29 Noe, R. A, "The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: test of a model" 39 : 497-523, 1986

      30 Reichheld, Fred, "The Microeconomics of Customer Relationships" 17 (17): 72-79, 2006

      31 최영준, "Success Case Method를 활용한 직무 교육훈련 전이 핵심 성공요인 탐색" 한국직업교육학회 30 (30): 303-326, 2011

      32 Phillips, J. J, "Return on investment in training and performance improvement programs" Butterworth-Heinemann 1997

      33 de Lancer Julnes, P, "Performance-based Management Systems: Effective Implementation and Maintenance" CRC Press 2009

      34 현영섭, "Kolb의 경험학습모형을 적용한 기업교육 학습전이 모형" 고려대학교 대학원 2004

      35 Holton, E. F, "In search of interactive model for HRD evaluation" 1995

      36 Bloom, B. S., "Handbook I: Cognitive Domain" David Mckay 1956

      37 Kirkpatrick, D. L, "Evaluating Training Programs" Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc 1994

      38 Ding, L., "Effect of Estimation Methods, Number of Indicators per Factor and Structural Equation Modeling" 2 (2): 119-143, 1995

      39 Holton, E. F, "Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory" 11 : 333-360, 2000

      40 Bae, J. Y., "Construction of a Postpartum depression model" 2 (2): 572-587, 2002

      41 김승진, "CM전문가의 직업윤리에 관한 연구" 한국건설관리학회 13 (13): 89-98, 2012

      42 Tracey, J. B., "Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment" 80 : 239-252, 1995

      43 Hatcher, Larry, "A step-by-step Approach to Using the SAS system for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling" SAS Institute 1994

      44 Oliver, R. L., "A cognitive model of antecedents and consequences of satisfication decision" 27 : 460-469, 1980

      45 L전자, "2011-2012 지속가능경영 보고서" L전자 2012

      46 한안나, "(A) study on factors affecting transfer of learning in corporate education" 서울대학교 대학원 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-16 학회명변경 영문명 : CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY NATIONAL TECNOLGOY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE -> CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE KCI등재후보
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼