RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      고교평준화 정책의 찬반논쟁과 향후 과제 분석 = Current Arguments and Future Tasks on the Equalization Policy in High School Entrance Examination

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3276123

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The study is to analyze current Arguments and consider future tasks on entrance examination policy in high school. The focus is on the improvement of the high school entrance examination system. Students, parents and people request an immediate change in the non-equalization policy in high school entrance examination because of the announcement on the new college entrance examination policy by the Ministry of Education. The study analyzes demands between those who adhered to non-equalization and those who changed equalization in the method of administrating high school entrance examinations, and it suggests future tasks on the Entrance Examination Policy in High School. Equalization policy intends to ignore excellence and individual difference in education and equalize education below, while non-equalization intends to reproduce inequality at the high school level and ignore self-esteem. The conclusion of the study is that even though one can choose between equalization and non-equalization, neither will be effective for improving the high school entrance examination system. Rather, the improvement of the high school entrance examination system will be not only reflected in the 2002 year's new college entrance examination policy but will also be reflected in the community condition.
      번역하기

      The study is to analyze current Arguments and consider future tasks on entrance examination policy in high school. The focus is on the improvement of the high school entrance examination system. Students, parents and people request an immediate change...

      The study is to analyze current Arguments and consider future tasks on entrance examination policy in high school. The focus is on the improvement of the high school entrance examination system. Students, parents and people request an immediate change in the non-equalization policy in high school entrance examination because of the announcement on the new college entrance examination policy by the Ministry of Education. The study analyzes demands between those who adhered to non-equalization and those who changed equalization in the method of administrating high school entrance examinations, and it suggests future tasks on the Entrance Examination Policy in High School. Equalization policy intends to ignore excellence and individual difference in education and equalize education below, while non-equalization intends to reproduce inequality at the high school level and ignore self-esteem. The conclusion of the study is that even though one can choose between equalization and non-equalization, neither will be effective for improving the high school entrance examination system. Rather, the improvement of the high school entrance examination system will be not only reflected in the 2002 year's new college entrance examination policy but will also be reflected in the community condition.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼