RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      청대 중서(中西) 도자 교류의 표상, 광채(廣彩)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102028451

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this research is to examine the origin, production technology and stylistic development of Guangcai, produced in Guangdong, China through the 18th and 19th Century. Through the analysis of related literature sources, existent works and excavation reports, it was able to define Guangcai as the fruit of cultural interaction of East and West. Thus, Guangcai itself worth demonstrating aesthetic value.
      First of all, the background of Guangcai production was examined through the Thirteen Factories, monopolistic trade system and Guangzhou as the most important trading port. Besides, exotic craftswork such as painting, furniture were widely produced from Guangzhou for exports. Guangdong area was also known for its long history of porcelain making including Shiwan(石?) Kiln, gives strong base for successful Guangcai production.
      The production of Guangcai emerged when the painting skills and styles of enamel on copper were developed during the Kangxi period. Its technology was introduced in the late Kangxi’s(1661-1722) reign from Europe and this was base for producing enamel ware for the Qing court. Prior to this, wucai pigment was difficult to make various color scheme, because addition of metal oxide coloring caused low plasticity. Guangcai is based on enamel pigment which is made of silicon and lead oxide combined with glass solution and addition of metal oxide coloring. After these elements were melted and cooled down, it was grinded to powder which made possible to make various color. Thus, the addition of new colors, high plasticity and control of pigment color made it suitable for export.
      Guangcai is technically and stylistically distinct from Wucai, Fencai, and Yangcai but similar to Yangcai in terms of shading, perspective and decorating subject. In fact, it is also classified as Fencai as it was mostly produced by folk kiln. However, it is to note that green, yellow and gold dominates the Guangcai plate and using oil instead of water to give shading is the unique characteristic of Guangcai. It is mostly decorated with the traditional features as well as Western figures and coat of arms and Guangdong landscape, demonstrating hybrid of East and West. Kangxi(1722-1735) to Qianlong(1735-1795) reign was the zenith of the production. In 19th century the production decreased but consistently exported to Europe and affected porcelain industry in China. The traditional craftsmanship carried throughout the Republican period with the further attempts of the literati’s painting on porcelain.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this research is to examine the origin, production technology and stylistic development of Guangcai, produced in Guangdong, China through the 18th and 19th Century. Through the analysis of related literature sources, existent works and ...

      The purpose of this research is to examine the origin, production technology and stylistic development of Guangcai, produced in Guangdong, China through the 18th and 19th Century. Through the analysis of related literature sources, existent works and excavation reports, it was able to define Guangcai as the fruit of cultural interaction of East and West. Thus, Guangcai itself worth demonstrating aesthetic value.
      First of all, the background of Guangcai production was examined through the Thirteen Factories, monopolistic trade system and Guangzhou as the most important trading port. Besides, exotic craftswork such as painting, furniture were widely produced from Guangzhou for exports. Guangdong area was also known for its long history of porcelain making including Shiwan(石?) Kiln, gives strong base for successful Guangcai production.
      The production of Guangcai emerged when the painting skills and styles of enamel on copper were developed during the Kangxi period. Its technology was introduced in the late Kangxi’s(1661-1722) reign from Europe and this was base for producing enamel ware for the Qing court. Prior to this, wucai pigment was difficult to make various color scheme, because addition of metal oxide coloring caused low plasticity. Guangcai is based on enamel pigment which is made of silicon and lead oxide combined with glass solution and addition of metal oxide coloring. After these elements were melted and cooled down, it was grinded to powder which made possible to make various color. Thus, the addition of new colors, high plasticity and control of pigment color made it suitable for export.
      Guangcai is technically and stylistically distinct from Wucai, Fencai, and Yangcai but similar to Yangcai in terms of shading, perspective and decorating subject. In fact, it is also classified as Fencai as it was mostly produced by folk kiln. However, it is to note that green, yellow and gold dominates the Guangcai plate and using oil instead of water to give shading is the unique characteristic of Guangcai. It is mostly decorated with the traditional features as well as Western figures and coat of arms and Guangdong landscape, demonstrating hybrid of East and West. Kangxi(1722-1735) to Qianlong(1735-1795) reign was the zenith of the production. In 19th century the production decreased but consistently exported to Europe and affected porcelain industry in China. The traditional craftsmanship carried throughout the Republican period with the further attempts of the literati’s painting on porcelain.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 광채의 제작배경 - 광주의 교류사적 위치와 도자생산
      • Ⅲ. 광채의 기원과 제작기술 - 경덕진 백자와 법랑채 기술의 결합
      • Ⅳ. 광채의 양식 변천 - 다양한 동서 양식의 혼재
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • I. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 광채의 제작배경 - 광주의 교류사적 위치와 도자생산
      • Ⅲ. 광채의 기원과 제작기술 - 경덕진 백자와 법랑채 기술의 결합
      • Ⅳ. 광채의 양식 변천 - 다양한 동서 양식의 혼재
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 宋良璧, "嶺南畫派與廣彩瓷器" (1) : 1991

      2 許之衡, "飮流齋說瓷" 紫禁城出版社 2005

      3 周麗麗, "關於洋彩與粉彩的討論─兼述淸代各朝官窯粉彩的特徵" 上海博物館 (10) : 2005

      4 周麗麗, "關於五彩分類及其特徵的討論" 上海博物館 (9) : 2002

      5 廖寶秀, "錦上添花話洋彩─兼談琺瑯彩, 粉彩" 國立故宮博物院 (280) : 2006

      6 廖賢娟, "論淸代行商制度與貿易發展的關係" 大葉大學通識敎育中心 (7) : 2013

      7 廖寶秀, "華麗彩瓷 : 乾隆洋彩" 國立故宮博物院 2006

      8 黃佩賢, "羊城文物博物硏究" 廣東文物博物館學會 2005

      9 陳瀅, "羊城文物博物硏究" 廣東文物博物館學會 2005

      10 梁廷柟, "粵海關志"

      1 宋良璧, "嶺南畫派與廣彩瓷器" (1) : 1991

      2 許之衡, "飮流齋說瓷" 紫禁城出版社 2005

      3 周麗麗, "關於洋彩與粉彩的討論─兼述淸代各朝官窯粉彩的特徵" 上海博物館 (10) : 2005

      4 周麗麗, "關於五彩分類及其特徵的討論" 上海博物館 (9) : 2002

      5 廖寶秀, "錦上添花話洋彩─兼談琺瑯彩, 粉彩" 國立故宮博物院 (280) : 2006

      6 廖賢娟, "論淸代行商制度與貿易發展的關係" 大葉大學通識敎育中心 (7) : 2013

      7 廖寶秀, "華麗彩瓷 : 乾隆洋彩" 國立故宮博物院 2006

      8 黃佩賢, "羊城文物博物硏究" 廣東文物博物館學會 2005

      9 陳瀅, "羊城文物博物硏究" 廣東文物博物館學會 2005

      10 梁廷柟, "粵海關志"

      11 劉子芬, "竹園陶說"

      12 廣東省博物館, "石灣陶展" 香港大學馮平山博物館 1979

      13 劉孟涵, "石灣藝術" 國際石灣陶藝會 2007

      14 鄧聰, "環珠江口史前文物圖錄" 中文大學出版社 1991

      15 胡繼芳, "琺瑯彩瓷與早期廣州彩瓷之比較" 陕西省文物局 (3) : 2007

      16 趙蘭, "無損分析方法對康熙, 雍正琺瑯彩瓷色釉的硏究" 2009

      17 王莉英, "淸代的琺瑯彩瓷器" (8) : 1979

      18 周正慶, "淸代的一口通商及此間的對外貿易問題" 國立臺灣師範大學歷史學系 (6) : 2000

      19 朱家溍, "淸代畫琺瑯器製造考" 故宮博物院 (3) : 1982

      20 蔡易安, "淸代廣式家具" 南天書局有限公司 1993

      21 李怡然, "淸代廣州行商崩潰原因探析-從美國"華爾街日報"的世界首富說開去" 徐州師範大學學報哲學社會科學版編輯部 35 (35): 2009

      22 王健華, "淸代宮中琺瑯彩綜述" 故宮博物院 (3) : 1993

      23 吳建雍, "淸代外銷瓷與早期中美貿易" 北京社會科學編輯部 (1) : 1987

      24 廣州博物館, "海貿遺珍 : 18-20世紀初期廣州外銷藝術品" 上海古籍出版社 2005

      25 周麗麗, "有關琺瑯彩幾個問題的探討─兼述琺瑯彩與洋彩的區別" 上海博物館 (8) : 2000

      26 藍浦, "景德鎭陶錄"

      27 施靜菲, "日月光華 淸宮畵琺瑯" 國立故宮博物院 2010

      28 施靜菲, "日月光華 淸宮畵琺瑯" 國立故宮博物院 2010

      29 廖寶秀, "從色地畫琺瑯與洋彩瓷器談文物定名問題" 國立故宮博物院 (321) : 2009

      30 施靜菲, "從文化脈絡探討淸代釉上彩名詞─琺瑯彩, 洋彩與粉彩" 國立故宮博物院 29 (29): 2010

      31 粱嘉彬, "廣東十三行考" 廣東人民出版社 1999

      32 孫荊 陳顯求, "廣彩鼻煙壺的胎,釉,彩的硏究" 上海古陶瓷科學技術硏究會 2 : 1992

      33 黃海姸, "廣州中西文化的交匯點─廣州" 華南硏究資料中心通訊 1997

      34 中國第一歷史檔案館, "康熙朝漢文硃批奏摺彙編 冊7" 檔案出版社 1985

      35 余佩瑾, "唐英與雍乾之際官窯的關係─以淸宮琺瑯彩瓷的繪製與燒造爲例" 國立故宮博物院 24 (24): 2006

      36 佚名, "南窯筆記"

      37 何介鈞, "南中國及鄰近地區古文化硏究" 中文大學出版社 1994

      38 施靜菲, "十八世紀東西交流的見證:淸宮畫琺瑯製作在康熙朝的建立" 國立故宮博物院 24 (24): 2007

      39 莊素娥, "十九世紀廣東外銷畫的贊助者─廣東十三行行 商" 臺灣大學藝術史硏究所 2001

      40 施靜菲, "乾隆朝粤海關成做之「廣琺瑯」" 國立臺灣大學藝術史硏究所 (35) : 2012

      41 寂園叟, "中國陶瓷名著彙編" 中國書店 1991

      42 趙輝, "中國考古學的跨世紀反思" 商務印書館 1999

      43 David Howard, "The East India Company and the Pearl River" 46 (46): 2000

      44 Carl.L.Crossman, "The Decorative Arts of the China Trade:Export Paintings, Furniture, Silver and other Objects" 1972

      45 Rose Kerr, "Chinese Export Ceramics" V&A Publishing 2011

      46 Margaret Jourdin, "Chinese Export Art in the Eighteenth Century, London: Country Life Limited" Charles Scribner’s Sons 1950

      47 Soame Jenyns, "Chinese Art, Minor Art Ⅱ: gold, silver, later bronzes, Cloisonne, Cantonese enamel, lacquer, furniture, wood" Pfidon 1980

      48 David Sanctuary Howard, "Chinese Armorial Porcelain: vol.2" Heirloom&Howard 2003

      49 David Sanctuary Howard, "Chinese Armorial Porcelain" Faber & Faber 1974

      50 Kingery, W. D., "Ceramics and Civilization: Technology and Style II" America Ceramic Society 1985

      51 Julian Henderson, "CERAMICS AND CIVILIZATION VOL Ⅳ CROSS-CRAFT AND CROSS-CULTURAL INTERACTIONS IN CERAMICS" The American Ceramic Society 1989

      52 汪慶正, ""粉彩"卽"洋彩"考" 上海博物館 (1) : 1981

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국근대미술사학회 -> 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회)
      영문명 : Institute Of Korean Modern Art Studies -> Association of Korean Modern & Contemporary Art History
      KCI등재
      2008-01-23 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국근대미술사학 -> 한국근현대미술사학(구 한국근대미술사학)
      외국어명 : The Journal of Korean Art History -> Journal of Korean Modern & Contemporary Art History
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Korean Art History KCI등재후보
      2005-05-24 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국근대미술사학 제11집 -> 한국근대미술사학 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.29 0.29 0.39
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.37 0.37 1.029 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼