차량-인프라 융합 자율주행에서 주행사업자의 역할과 진입규제 설정방안 = The Role of Driving Service Providers in Vehicle-infra Fusion Driving

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Autonomous driving is now developing from a vehicle-centered model to a vehicle-infrastructure fusion model with the advancement of infrastructure technology. In order to realize such vehicle-infrastructure fusion autonomous driving, there should be some entity in charge of collecting information from infrastructure and providing it to the vehicles that need it, and the entity in charge of this role can be defined as a driving service provider (DSP). Such a DSP may provide various services to the vehicles in particular (i) driving information services, (ii) driving guidance services, or (iii) driving control services. When establishing entry regulations for these DSPs that provide these various driving services, these factors should be considered: (i) whether the speed of the vehicle under management is high or low, (ii) whether the road is an open road or a closed road, and (iii) whether a driver is on board or not.
Finally, it is necessary to discuss what legal measures are needed to implement this DSPs system in Korea. First, vehicles should be classified into two categories: vehicles with drivers and vehicles without drivers, and for the latter, the appointment of a safety service DSP should be enforced. This is because in unmanned vehicles there is no entity responsible for control in emergency. Secondly, it is necessary to establish entry regulations for these 3 types of DSPs, (i) driving information providers, (ii) driving guidance providers, and (iii) driving control providers. In this paper, it is argued that these three DSPs must be introduced for the business areas that can be served with the current level of infrastructure technology. In order to establish the entry regulatory system for these each service DSPs, three regulatory factors above-mentioned should be taken into account: (i) the speed of the vehicles, (ii) on public road or otherwise, and (iii) presence of a driver or otherwise.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이중기, "차량중심 자율주행에서 차량·인프라 융합 자율주행으로 – 원격제어와 주행사업자 규제체제" 24 (24): 2023

2 김종우, "정부·통신사, 5G ‘초고속’만 외치고 ‘지연율 개선’ 감감"

3 이종철, "전기차 붐 잇는다...글로벌 선두에 박차 가하는 中 스마트커넥티드카"

4 전현명 ; 양인철 ; 김형수 ; 이준형 ; 김선겸 ; 장지용, "자율협력주행을 위한 인프라 가이던스 서비스 유스케이스 도출 방법론 연구" 23 (23): 1331-, 2022

5 이중기, "자율주행차 사고와 제조물책임: ADS Entity 등의 제조업자로서의 책임" 34 (34): 2020

6 이중기, "자율주행차 사고와 운행자책임: 보유자와 ADS Entity의 책임" 21 (21): 2020

7 황창근 ; 이중기, "자율주행차 사고와 운전자책임: 운전자와 ADS Entity 간 책임의 분화" 21 (21): 2020

8 이충훈, "자율주행자동차의 교통사고에 대한 민사법적 책임" 인하대 19 (19): 137-, 2016

9 공학한림원 자율주행위원회, "자율주행 Global 1등, 그 길을 찾아서 – Vehicle과 Infra의 융합 V∗I로"

10 한기정, "자동차손해배상보장법상의 운행의 개념에 관한 연구" 49 (49): 2008

11 박준환, "운전자가 없는 자율주행을 고려한 일본의 도로교통법 개정동향과 시사점" 국회입법조사처 (1994) : 2022

12 오지용, "무인자동차와 관련한 자동차손해배상보장법 제3조의 해석" (709) : 99-, 2015

13 이근호, "구글 웨이모 미국에서 자율주행 택시 전면 상용화, 누구나 이용 가능"

14 CSF, "中 스마트 커넥티드 카 ‘차량-도로-클라우드’ 통합 발전 추진"

15 ISO, "Texonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles" 2021

16 양연호, "BMW 홀린 서울로보틱스, 글로벌 완성차 제조사 ‘러브콜’"

17 Law Commission, "Automated Vehicles: Joint Report" 2022