교사의 비언어적 의사소통 행동이 학생의 수업 참여도와 학업 성취도 도움에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Nonverbal Communication of Teachers on Participation in Instruction and Academic Achievement Help

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to empirically analyze the effects of nonverbal communication of teachers on students` participation in instruction and academic achievement help. Nonverbal communication as independent variables in the study included kinesics(eye contact, countenance, physical contact, gesture), paralanguage(tone, speed of talking, dialects), proxemics(distance/closeness), artifacts(clothes, make-up). Major findings in the study are as follows: First, almost all the positive nonverbal communication behaviors of teachers significantly affected on students` participation in instruction and academic achievement help more than the negative ones of teachers did. The positive nonverbal communication behaviors include warm eye contact, bright and smiling countenance, patting one`s head, shoulder, and back, proper gestures, teaching at close, louder voice, proper speed of talking, and clean and neat clothes, while the negative ones included frowning, unsatisfied eye contact, angry and worried countenance, teaching without looking at students, teaching without moving, punching on the head, slow or fast speed of talking, and heavy perfume smell. Second, there was no significant difference on dependent variables among the positive nonverbal communication behaviors of teachers, while there was significant difference on dependent variables among negative nonverbal ones of teachers. Finally, if subjects would be different from the study, the results could be different from in dialects teachers use and clothes teachers wear. Implications of these results are that teachers should be aware of the importance of the nonverbal communication behaviors that affect students` learning and their academic achievements. Nonverbal communication behaviors need to be dealt with as instructional media in the field of educational technology.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김쾌상 역, "육체의 언어학" 일월서각 1990

2 김상희, "서비스접점에서 판매원 언어적·비언어적 커뮤니케이션이 고객감정과 행동의도에 미치는 영향 - 정서감염현상을 중심으로 -" 한국소비자학회 18 (18): 97-131, 2007

3 김정욱, "서비스 제공자의 비언어적 커뮤니케이션이 고객의 서비스 품질 지각에 미치는 영향" 한국마케팅관리학회 11 (11): 153-172, 2006

4 김유경, "서비스 제공자의 비언어적 커뮤니케이션에 관한 연구" 한국마케팅과학회 15 (15): 117-148, 2005

5 김연화, "비언어적 의사소통의 의미와 교육적 기능에 관한 연구" 청주교육대학교 교육대학원 2002

6 박 원, "비언어적 의사소통에 관한 사례 연구" 3 : 259-279, 1997

7 정성호, "대학교수의 비언어적 요소가 수업성취도에 미친 영향의 유형에 과난 연구:Q 방법론 적용을 중심으로" 한국커뮤니케이션학회 12 (12): 90-117, 2004

8 이경탁, "교수의 비언어적 커뮤니케이션 사용이 학생들의 학업성취도에 미치는 영향" 한국전략마케팅학회 18 (18): 125-140, 2010

9 송용의, "교수-학습방법. 교육학총론" 양서원 1992

10 장상호, "교수, 학습, 그리고 의사소통" 교육과학사 1987

11 박순희, "교사의 비언어적 행동에 대한 학생의 지각차와 학습태도 및 학업성취와의 관계에 관한 문화적 기술 연구" 한국교원대학교 대학원 1992

12 황명자, "교사의 비언어적 행동에 대한 초등학생의 경험과 선호도에 관한 연구" 20 (20): 103-136, 2004

13 이양자, "교사의 비구두적 접촉의 교육적 효과에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 교육대학원 1989

14 Hall, E. T, "The silent language" Doubleday 1959

15 Sundaram, D. S, "The role of nonverbal comunication in service encounter" 14 (14): 378-391, 2000

16 Christophel, D. M, "The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning" 39 : 323-340, 1990

17 Thweatt, K, "The impact of teacher immediacy and misbehaviors on teacher credibility" 47 : 348-358, 1998

18 Ferraro, G, "The culture dimension of international business" Pearson Prentice Hall 2006

19 Leathers, D. G, "Successful nonverbal communication:Principles and applications" Allyn and Bacon 1986

20 Frymier, A, "Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility" 41 : 388-399, 1992

21 Goldhaber, G. M, "Organization communication" Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers 1983

22 Burgoon, J, "Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue" Harper & Row 1989

23 Tubbs, S, L, "Nonverbal communication: Principles and Contexts" McGraw-Hill 2003

24 Smith, H. A, "Nonverbal communication in teaching" 49 (49): 34-51, 1985

25 Knapp, M. L, "Nonverbal communication in human interaction" Thompson Publishers 2006

26 Mehrabian, A, "Nonverbal communication" Aldine Antherton 1972

27 Burgoon, J. K, "Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion and credibility" 17 : 140-169, 1990

28 Birdwhistell, R, "Kinesics and context" University of Pennsylvania Press 1970

29 Birdwhistell, R, "Introduction to kinesi" University of Louisville Press 1952

30 Davis, F, "Inside intuition: What we know about nonverbal communication (3rd Ed.)" McGraw-Hill Book Company 1973

31 Dodd, C. H, "Dynamic of interculture communication" Wm. C. Brown Company Publisgers 1982

32 Lincoln, D. J, "Drama in the classroom: How and why marketing educator can use nonverbal communication and enthusiasm to build student rapport" 18 (18): 53-65, 2008

33 Richmond, V, "Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation" 39 : 181-195, 1990

34 Neill, S, "Classroom nonverbal communication" Routledge 1991

35 Argyle,M, "Bodily communication" International University 1988

36 Leigh, T. W, "An initial evaluation of industrial buyers' impressions of salespersons' nonverbal cues" 22 (22): 41-53, 2002

37 Gabbott, M, "An empirical investigation of the impact of non-verbal communication on service evaluation" 34 (34): 384-398, 2000

38 이화여자대학교 교육공학과, "21세기 교육방법 및 교육공학" 교육과학사 2001