RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      개발방법론이 개발직무의 동기유발성에 미치는 영향에 대한 분석 = Analysis of how Development Methodologies Influence the Potential Motivation of Software Developers

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82352544

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Agile methodology is a new trend in software development. Nowadays enterprises have been adopting the agile methodology in an effort to deal effectively with rapidly changing user requirements. In most cases, much improvement was accomplished in the software development. Some studies have mentioned that the motivation of software developers is a contributing factor on the improvement. However, it is not known yet what aspects of the agile methodology get them to be motivated.
      The aims of this study are the comparison between the traditional methodologies and agile methodology and look into potential motivation of software developer and their jobcharacteristics. For the empirical analyzing, research data were collected by 77 developers of 4 domestic IT companies. The analysis shows that there is significant differences on developer’s potential motivation according to what kind of methodology is used. Agile developers to be more motivated than others methodologies developers. It also shows in detail that what kinds of job characteristics of developer are different among them depending on methodologies.
      번역하기

      The Agile methodology is a new trend in software development. Nowadays enterprises have been adopting the agile methodology in an effort to deal effectively with rapidly changing user requirements. In most cases, much improvement was accomplished in t...

      The Agile methodology is a new trend in software development. Nowadays enterprises have been adopting the agile methodology in an effort to deal effectively with rapidly changing user requirements. In most cases, much improvement was accomplished in the software development. Some studies have mentioned that the motivation of software developers is a contributing factor on the improvement. However, it is not known yet what aspects of the agile methodology get them to be motivated.
      The aims of this study are the comparison between the traditional methodologies and agile methodology and look into potential motivation of software developer and their jobcharacteristics. For the empirical analyzing, research data were collected by 77 developers of 4 domestic IT companies. The analysis shows that there is significant differences on developer’s potential motivation according to what kind of methodology is used. Agile developers to be more motivated than others methodologies developers. It also shows in detail that what kinds of job characteristics of developer are different among them depending on methodologies.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 연구 배경
      • 3. 연구 모형
      • 4. 실증분석
      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 연구 배경
      • 3. 연구 모형
      • 4. 실증분석
      • 5. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • 저자소개
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이수화, "직무특성 모형에서 자아효능감과 공정성민감도의 조절효과에 관한 연구" 전남 대학교 대학원 2006

      2 Hackman,J.R, "Work Redesign" Addison-Wesley 1980

      3 Cockburn,A, "The costs and Benefits of pair programming" 2000

      4 Baddoo,N, "The Software Process Improvement Paradox: Approaches to Quality Management" 97-101, 2000

      5 Rising, "The Scrum Software Development Process for Small Teams" 17 (17): 26-32, 2000

      6 Deemer, Pete, "The Scrum Primer:An Introduction to Agile Project Management with Scrum"

      7 Sasa,M.D, "The Influence of the Information Systems Development Approach on Maintenance" MIS Quarterly 1992

      8 Siakas, "The Human Factor Deployment for Improved Agile Quality" International Proceedings of EuroSPI 11-23, 2006

      9 Erdogmus,H, "The Economics of Software Development by Pair Programmers" 48 (48): 283-319, 2003

      10 Fried,Y, "The Critical Psychological States:An Under-represented Component in Job Characteristics Model Research" 21 : 279-303, 1987

      1 이수화, "직무특성 모형에서 자아효능감과 공정성민감도의 조절효과에 관한 연구" 전남 대학교 대학원 2006

      2 Hackman,J.R, "Work Redesign" Addison-Wesley 1980

      3 Cockburn,A, "The costs and Benefits of pair programming" 2000

      4 Baddoo,N, "The Software Process Improvement Paradox: Approaches to Quality Management" 97-101, 2000

      5 Rising, "The Scrum Software Development Process for Small Teams" 17 (17): 26-32, 2000

      6 Deemer, Pete, "The Scrum Primer:An Introduction to Agile Project Management with Scrum"

      7 Sasa,M.D, "The Influence of the Information Systems Development Approach on Maintenance" MIS Quarterly 1992

      8 Siakas, "The Human Factor Deployment for Improved Agile Quality" International Proceedings of EuroSPI 11-23, 2006

      9 Erdogmus,H, "The Economics of Software Development by Pair Programmers" 48 (48): 283-319, 2003

      10 Fried,Y, "The Critical Psychological States:An Under-represented Component in Job Characteristics Model Research" 21 : 279-303, 1987

      11 Oldham,G.R, "Strategies for Intrafirm Transfers and Outside Sourcing" 28 (28): 1985

      12 Linberg, K. R, "Software Developer Perceptions about Software Project Failure: A Case Study" 49 (49): 177-192, 1999

      13 Baddoo,N, "Software Developer Motivation in a High Maturity Company:A Case Study" 11 (11): 219-228, 2006

      14 Demarco,Tom, "Peopleware:Productive Projects and Teams" Dorset House 1999

      15 Eby,L.T, "Motivational Bases of Affective Organizational Commitment:A Partial Test of an Integrative Theoretical Model" 72 : 463-483, 1999

      16 Hackman,J.R, "Motivation through the Design of Work:Test of a Theory" 16 : 250-279, 1976

      17 Anselmo, "Measuring Productivity in the Software Industry" 46 (46): 121-125, 2003

      18 Cohn,Mike, "Introducing an Agile Process to an Organization" IEEE Computer 2003

      19 Jason,B, "IT Worker Turnover:An Empirical Examination of Intrinsic Motivation" 37 (37): 2006

      20 Muller,M, "Extreme programming from an engineering Economics Viewpoint" 2002

      21 Beck,Kent, "Extreme Programming Explained" Addison-Wesley 2000

      22 Maurer, F, "Extreme Programming : Rapid development for Webbased Applications" 6 (6): 86-90, 2002

      23 Schwaber,C, "Enterprise Agile Adaptation in 2007"

      24 Boehm,B.W, "Engineering Economics, Prentice- Hall" Englewood Cliffs 1981

      25 Mannaro, "Empirical Analysis on the Satisfaction of IT Employees Comparing XP Practices with Other Software Development Methodologies" 6-10, 2004

      26 Law,Amy, "Effects of Agile Practices on Social Factors" 2005

      27 Ambler,Scott W, "Dr Dobb’s 2007 Agile Adoption Survey"

      28 Beecham,S, "Does the XP Environment Meet the Motivational Needs of the Software Developer? An Empirical Study" 2007

      29 Hackman,J.R, "Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey" 60 (60): 159-170, 1975

      30 Schwaber Ken, "Controlled Chaos:Living on the Edge" American Programmer 1996

      31 Melnik,G, "Comparative Analysis of Job Satisfaction in Agile and Non-Agile Software Development Teams" 32-42, 2006

      32 Marcal, "Blending Scrum Practices and CMMI Project Management Process Areas" 4 (4): 2008

      33 Ilieva,S, "Analyses of an Agile Methodology Implementation" 326-333, 2004

      34 Augustine,Sanjiv, "Agile project management:steering from the edges" 48 (48): 85-89, 2005

      35 Cockburn,Alistir, "Agile Software Development:The People Factor" 34 (34): 131-133, 2001

      36 Mak,B.L, "A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of IS Employee Motivation and Retention" 38 : 256-276, 2001

      37 Awad,M.A, "A Comparison between Agile and Traditional Software Development Methodologies" University of Western Australia 2005

      38 Mann,Chris, "A Case Study on the Impact of Scrum on Overtime and Customer Satisfaction" 70-79, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-04-01 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국데이타베이스학회 -> 한국데이터전략학회
      영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Data Strategy Society
      KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-06-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of Information Technology Applications & Menagement -> Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
      외국어명 : Journal of Information Technology Applications & Menagement -> Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.39 0.39 0.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.59 0.56 0.673 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼