RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    G20 정상회의: 서울 정상 회의의 주요 의제 분석과 향후 전망 = The G20: from Seoul to Paris and beyond

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper reviews what has been done and what should be done at the G20 Summit meetings and suggests key agendas to be focused on beyond the Seoul Summit so that the G20 can genuinely become the premier forum for international economic cooperation. First, the G20 leaders must address the problem of global imbalances even though it is very sensitive and politically difficult. But naming and shaming must be avoided and more balanced and comprehensive discussions will be needed. Second, regarding financial reforms, the G20 Summit should focus more on follow-up agendas than on new ones and derive comprehensive action plans that include country-specific commitments. Third, besides the quota reform already achieved, the G20 leaders must conclude further issues of IMF governance reforms by agreeing on details. Fourth, discussions and suggested ideas up to now on global safety nets are insufficient to tackle the intrinsic problem of capital flow volatility. The G20 Summit should be committed to reducing volatile movement of international capital by introducing direct and pre-emptive measures. Fifth, the G20 needs to show some progress to break the current impasse of trade negotiations so that its credibility can be greatly enhanced. Sixth, the G20 leaders must recognize that for the success of the development agenda, the multi-year action plans endorsed at the Seoul Summit should further and continuously be carried on at the G20 Cannes Summit in 2011 and the Mexico Summit in 2012. Last but not least, to overcome those challenges regarding legitimacy issues, characteristics issues, institutionalization issues, and relationships with international organizations and successfully achieve its ultimate goal, the G20 must establish an effective implementation mechanism.
    번역하기

    This paper reviews what has been done and what should be done at the G20 Summit meetings and suggests key agendas to be focused on beyond the Seoul Summit so that the G20 can genuinely become the premier forum for international economic cooperation. F...

    This paper reviews what has been done and what should be done at the G20 Summit meetings and suggests key agendas to be focused on beyond the Seoul Summit so that the G20 can genuinely become the premier forum for international economic cooperation. First, the G20 leaders must address the problem of global imbalances even though it is very sensitive and politically difficult. But naming and shaming must be avoided and more balanced and comprehensive discussions will be needed. Second, regarding financial reforms, the G20 Summit should focus more on follow-up agendas than on new ones and derive comprehensive action plans that include country-specific commitments. Third, besides the quota reform already achieved, the G20 leaders must conclude further issues of IMF governance reforms by agreeing on details. Fourth, discussions and suggested ideas up to now on global safety nets are insufficient to tackle the intrinsic problem of capital flow volatility. The G20 Summit should be committed to reducing volatile movement of international capital by introducing direct and pre-emptive measures. Fifth, the G20 needs to show some progress to break the current impasse of trade negotiations so that its credibility can be greatly enhanced. Sixth, the G20 leaders must recognize that for the success of the development agenda, the multi-year action plans endorsed at the Seoul Summit should further and continuously be carried on at the G20 Cannes Summit in 2011 and the Mexico Summit in 2012. Last but not least, to overcome those challenges regarding legitimacy issues, characteristics issues, institutionalization issues, and relationships with international organizations and successfully achieve its ultimate goal, the G20 must establish an effective implementation mechanism.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼