RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    유럽연합 지역정책의 거버넌스 방식 = A New Mode of Governance in the EU's Regional Policy?

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The argument of this paper is that the regional policy of the EU is governed not just by the 'Community method' but also by 'new' modes of governance. The recent contribution by Sabel and Zeitlin about the 'experimentalist governance,' which refers to the underlying governance arrangements of framework rule-making and revision in the EU, opens a new chapter in the debate on new modes of governance in the EU. They, however, do not include regional policy in the policy areas where experimentalist governance prevails, thus leave EU regional policy in the areas where the old Community method reigns.
    In contrast to this dominant view about governance mechanism in the EU regional policy, this paper shows the development of new modes of governance in the EU regional policy area in three aspects. First, what Sabel called 'regional experimentalism' has developed in EU regional policy, in particular thanks to the principle of 'partnership' firmly established in that policy area. Second, regional policy and innovation policy have converged together towards regional innovation policy in the EU, adding new weights to regional experimentalism. Converged with innovation policy, EU regional policy has been promoting 'social learning' through active interaction among various actors and across regions. Not just advancing intra―and inter―regional interactive learning, EU also explicitly urges regions themselves to 'experiment' with new ideas and strategies. Finally, we can also find some explicit efforts to establish experimentalist governance in EU regional policy, including the expansion of OMC and the adoption of the 'strategy approach' for the EU cohesion policy for 2007-2013 period.
    번역하기

    The argument of this paper is that the regional policy of the EU is governed not just by the 'Community method' but also by 'new' modes of governance. The recent contribution by Sabel and Zeitlin about the 'experimentalist governance,' which refers to...

    The argument of this paper is that the regional policy of the EU is governed not just by the 'Community method' but also by 'new' modes of governance. The recent contribution by Sabel and Zeitlin about the 'experimentalist governance,' which refers to the underlying governance arrangements of framework rule-making and revision in the EU, opens a new chapter in the debate on new modes of governance in the EU. They, however, do not include regional policy in the policy areas where experimentalist governance prevails, thus leave EU regional policy in the areas where the old Community method reigns.
    In contrast to this dominant view about governance mechanism in the EU regional policy, this paper shows the development of new modes of governance in the EU regional policy area in three aspects. First, what Sabel called 'regional experimentalism' has developed in EU regional policy, in particular thanks to the principle of 'partnership' firmly established in that policy area. Second, regional policy and innovation policy have converged together towards regional innovation policy in the EU, adding new weights to regional experimentalism. Converged with innovation policy, EU regional policy has been promoting 'social learning' through active interaction among various actors and across regions. Not just advancing intra―and inter―regional interactive learning, EU also explicitly urges regions themselves to 'experiment' with new ideas and strategies. Finally, we can also find some explicit efforts to establish experimentalist governance in EU regional policy, including the expansion of OMC and the adoption of the 'strategy approach' for the EU cohesion policy for 2007-2013 period.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안두순, ""혁신의 경제학"관점에서 본 EU의 정책" 한독경상학회 24 (24): 1-23, 2006

    2 김시홍, "이탈리아의 유럽화: 결속정책을 중심으로" 국제지역연구센터 10 (10): 109-134, 2006

    3 안두순, "유럽연합의 산업정책 및 혁신정책의 의미와 역할" 한국유럽학회 (21) : 175-206, 2005

    4 송병준, "유럽연합의 다층적 통치에서 새로운 지역행위자에 대한 연구" 한국유럽학회 (22) : 45-65, 2006

    5 정홍열, "유럽연합(EU) 지역 정책의 발전과 전망" (13) : 101-131, 2001

    6 김태연, "유럽연합 지역정책의 추진체계와 효과: 잉글랜드 목적 1지역 사례" 한국유럽학회 (23) : 139-166, 2006

    7 이무성, "신생동유럽회원국가의 유럽화:지역정책을 중심으로" 한국유럽학회 26 (26): 79-100, 2008

    8 차미숙, "세계화 시대의 지역균형발전과 EU의 지역정책: EU의구조기금(structural funds)의 운영사례를 중심으로" 11 : 99-119, 2001

    9 Landabaso, Mikel, "Towards a Different Regional Innovation Policy: Eight Years of European Experience through the European Regional Development Fund Innovative Actions in Regional Development and Conditions for Innovation in the Network Society" Purdue University Press 209-240, 2005

    10 Hassink, Robert, "Towards Regionally Embedded Innovation Support Systems in South Korea? Case Studies from Kyongbuk-Taegu and Kyonggi" 38 (38): 1373-1395, 2001

    1 안두순, ""혁신의 경제학"관점에서 본 EU의 정책" 한독경상학회 24 (24): 1-23, 2006

    2 김시홍, "이탈리아의 유럽화: 결속정책을 중심으로" 국제지역연구센터 10 (10): 109-134, 2006

    3 안두순, "유럽연합의 산업정책 및 혁신정책의 의미와 역할" 한국유럽학회 (21) : 175-206, 2005

    4 송병준, "유럽연합의 다층적 통치에서 새로운 지역행위자에 대한 연구" 한국유럽학회 (22) : 45-65, 2006

    5 정홍열, "유럽연합(EU) 지역 정책의 발전과 전망" (13) : 101-131, 2001

    6 김태연, "유럽연합 지역정책의 추진체계와 효과: 잉글랜드 목적 1지역 사례" 한국유럽학회 (23) : 139-166, 2006

    7 이무성, "신생동유럽회원국가의 유럽화:지역정책을 중심으로" 한국유럽학회 26 (26): 79-100, 2008

    8 차미숙, "세계화 시대의 지역균형발전과 EU의 지역정책: EU의구조기금(structural funds)의 운영사례를 중심으로" 11 : 99-119, 2001

    9 Landabaso, Mikel, "Towards a Different Regional Innovation Policy: Eight Years of European Experience through the European Regional Development Fund Innovative Actions in Regional Development and Conditions for Innovation in the Network Society" Purdue University Press 209-240, 2005

    10 Hassink, Robert, "Towards Regionally Embedded Innovation Support Systems in South Korea? Case Studies from Kyongbuk-Taegu and Kyonggi" 38 (38): 1373-1395, 2001

    11 European Commission, "Third Progress Report on Cohesion: Towards a New Partnership for Growth, Jobs and Cohesion" 2005a

    12 Le Bail, Francoise, "The Regional Innovation Scoreboard: Measuring Innovation in Europe at Regional Level" Brussels 2006

    13 Chiattelli, Carlo, "The Reform of the Lisbon Strategy’s Governance Framework: Is ‘New Governance’ the Way Forward?" 2 (2): 4-20, 2006

    14 Kaiser, Robert, "The Open Method of Coordination in the European Research Area: A New Concept of Deepening Integration?" 3 (3): 289-306, 2005b

    15 Jachtenfuchs, Markus, "The Governance Approach to European Integration" 39 (39): 245-264, 2001

    16 Yesilkagit, Kutsal, "Supranational Governance or National Business-as-Usual? The National Administration of EU Structural Funds in the Netherlands and Denmark" The Open Method of Co-ordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies 85 (85): 503-524, 2007

    17 MacPhail, Eilidh, "Subnational Authorities and the Open Method of Coor- dination: A New Opportunity or the Same Old Community" 2 (2): 58-74, 2006

    18 European Commission, "Structural Actions 2000-2006: Commentary and Regulations" Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2000

    19 Kohler-Koch, Beate, "Review Article: The ‘Governance Turn’ in EU Studies" 44 (44): 27-49, 2006

    20 Fitoussi, Jean-Paul, "Report on the State of the European Union, Volume 2: Reforming the European Union" Palgrave Macmillan 2007

    21 Fitoussi, Jean-Paul, "Report on the State of the European Union, Volume 1" Palgrave Macmillan 2005

    22 Bruijn, Pieter de, "Regional Innovation Systems in the Lisbon Strategy" 13 (13): 1153-1172, 2005

    23 Derkzen, Petra, "Partnership and Role Perception, Three Case Studies on the Meaning of Being a Representative in Rural Partnerships" 27 (27): 75-89, 2009

    24 European Commission, "New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation" Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2004

    25 Héritier, Adrienne, "New Modes of Governance in Europe: Increasing Political Capacity and Policy Effectiveness? in The State of the European Union Vol. 6: Law, Politics, and Society" Oxford University Press 105-126, 2003

    26 Eberlein, Burkard, "New Governance in the European Union: A Theoretical Perspective" 42 (42): 121-142, 2004

    27 Hooghe, Liesbet, "Multi-Level Governance and European Integration" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2001

    28 Kaiser, Robert, "Missing the Lisbon Target? Multi-Level Innovation and EU Policy Coordination" 25 (25): 241-263, 2005a

    29 Scott, Joanne, "Mind the Gap: Law and New Approaches to Governance in the European Union" 8 (8): 1-18, 2002

    30 Kaiser, Robert, "Managing Diversity in a System of Multi-level Governance: The Open Method of Co-ordination in Innovation Policy" 11 (11): 249-266, 2004

    31 Scharpf, Fritz W., "Legitimate Diversity: The New Challenge of European Integration in The State of the European Union Vol. 6: Law, Politics, and Society" Oxford University Press 79-104, 2003

    32 Sabel, Charles F., "Learning-by-Monitoring: the Dilemmas of Regional Economic Policy in Europe in Networks of Enterprises and Local Development" OECD 1996

    33 Sabel, Charles F., "Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU" 14 (14): 271-327, 2008

    34 Armstrong, Kenneth, "JCMS Symposium: EU Governance after Lisbon" 46 (46): 413-450, 2008

    35 European Commission, "Innovative Strategies and Actions: Results from 15 Years of Regional Experimentation, European Commission Working Document, Directorate-General regional Policy" 2006

    36 European Commission, "Innovative Strategies and Actions: Results from 15 Years of Regional Experimentation" European Commission Working Document 2007b

    37 Guth, Michael, "Innovation, Social Inclusion and Coherent Regional Development: A New Diamond for a Socially Inclusive Innovation Policy in Regions" 13 (13): 333-349, 2005

    38 Hübner, Danuta, "Innovating through EU Regional Policy" Brussels 2006

    39 European Commission, "Green Paper on Innovation" 1995

    40 Faludi, Andreas, "From European Spatial Development to Territorial Cohesion Policy" 40 (40): 667-678, 2006

    41 European Commission, "European Innovation Scoreboard 2007: Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance" Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2008

    42 European Commission, "European Governance: A White Paper" Brussels 2001

    43 이철우, "EU의 지역정책변화와 지역혁신정책의 함의" 국토연구원 34 : 15-28, 2002

    44 Department of Trade and Industry(DTI), "EU Structural and Cohesion Funds in Accompanying Paper to Ministerial Statement by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry"

    45 Kaufmann, Alexander, "EU Regional Policy and the Stimulation of Innovation: The Role of the European Regional Development Fund in the Objective 1 Region Burgenland" 13 (13): 581-599, 2005

    46 Henderson, Dylan, "EU Regional Innovation Strategies: Regional Experimentalism in Practice?" 7 (7): 347-358, 2000

    47 Bachtler, John, "EU Cohesion Policy and the Role of the Regions: Investigating the Influence of Structural Funds in the New Member States" 26 (26): 398-427, 2008

    48 Council of the European Union, "Draft National Strategic Reference Framework, EU Structural Funds Programmes: 2007-2013" Regional European Funds Directorate 2006

    49 Council of the European Union, "Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 Laying Down General Provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999" 210 : 25-78, 2006

    50 Council of the European Union, "Council Decision of 6 October 2006 on Community Strategic Guidelines on Cohesion (2006/702/EC)" 291 : 11-32, 2006

    51 European Commission, "Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013" Brussels 2005b

    52 European Commission, "Cohesion Policy 2007-13: National Strategic Reference Frameworks" Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2007c

    53 European Commission, "Cohesion Policy 2007-13: Commentaries and Official Texts" Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2007a

    54 Laffan, Brigid, "Classifying and Mapping OMC in Different Policy Areas in New Modes of Governance Project, reference number: 02/ D09"

    55 Mosher, James S., "Alternative Approaches to Governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy" 41 (41): 63-88, 2003

    56 Hollanders, Hugo, "2006 European Regional Innovation Scoreboard (2006 RIS)"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-07-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea and World Politics KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.92 0.92 0.91
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.88 0.95 1.328 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼