RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국내 신재생에너지 기업의 리스크 분석 = An Analysis of Time Varying Beta Risk in Domestic Renewable Energy Company

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99591702

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역


    Renewable energy industry not only has a promising future but also has more risk than conventional energy industry because of its characteristics. Therefore, in this study, an analysis of domestic renewable energy company risk has been performed. The risk of domestic wind and photovoltaic energy companies has been analyzed by using time varying beta model. The model has been constructed based on risk factors like firm size, firm diversification index, domestic installation, and so on. The principal result of analysis can be summarized as follows. First, risk factors affect domestic renewable energy companies have been discovered. Variables like firm size, growth rate of debt ratio, firm diversification index are statistically significant. I found that large firms are less riskier than small firms. It is also confirmed that companies with high diversification index and high debt ratio have high risk. Second, I got the result that policy factors like domestic renewable energy installation and government R&D expenditure could decrease risk of domestic renewable energy company. Third, relative sensitivity of each risk factor have been discovered. The effect of each variable gets bigger in this order: growth rate of domestic installation, firm size or diversification index, growth rate of debt ratio, growth rate of government R&D expenditure.
    번역하기

    Renewable energy industry not only has a promising future but also has more risk than conventional energy industry because of its characteristics. Therefore, in this study, an analysis of domestic renewable energy company risk has been performed. Th...


    Renewable energy industry not only has a promising future but also has more risk than conventional energy industry because of its characteristics. Therefore, in this study, an analysis of domestic renewable energy company risk has been performed. The risk of domestic wind and photovoltaic energy companies has been analyzed by using time varying beta model. The model has been constructed based on risk factors like firm size, firm diversification index, domestic installation, and so on. The principal result of analysis can be summarized as follows. First, risk factors affect domestic renewable energy companies have been discovered. Variables like firm size, growth rate of debt ratio, firm diversification index are statistically significant. I found that large firms are less riskier than small firms. It is also confirmed that companies with high diversification index and high debt ratio have high risk. Second, I got the result that policy factors like domestic renewable energy installation and government R&D expenditure could decrease risk of domestic renewable energy company. Third, relative sensitivity of each risk factor have been discovered. The effect of each variable gets bigger in this order: growth rate of domestic installation, firm size or diversification index, growth rate of debt ratio, growth rate of government R&D expenditure.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 수출입은행 해외경제연구실 산업투자조사실, "태양광 기업들의 기회와 위험요인" 2012

    2 송동섭, "코스닥기업의 회계정보가 주식가격에 미치는 영향" 한국중소기업학회 24 (24): 4-100, 2002

    3 에너지관리공단 신재생에너지센터, "신재생에너지 산업현황"

    4 이재우, "신재생에너지 산업의 장애 및 위험요인과 금융방식" 수출입은행 2009

    5 이의재, "국내 신재생에너지 기업의 리스크 분석" 2012

    6 International Energy Agency, "World Energy Outlook 2010" 2010

    7 Baird, I. S., "What is risk anyway?, In Risk, Strategy, and Management" JAI Press 21-52, 1990

    8 Chan, L. K., "The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures" 56 : 2431-2456, 2001

    9 Yates, J. F., "The risk construct" Wiley 1-25, 1992

    10 Peters, M., "The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical chage- Does the locus of policies matter?" 2012

    1 수출입은행 해외경제연구실 산업투자조사실, "태양광 기업들의 기회와 위험요인" 2012

    2 송동섭, "코스닥기업의 회계정보가 주식가격에 미치는 영향" 한국중소기업학회 24 (24): 4-100, 2002

    3 에너지관리공단 신재생에너지센터, "신재생에너지 산업현황"

    4 이재우, "신재생에너지 산업의 장애 및 위험요인과 금융방식" 수출입은행 2009

    5 이의재, "국내 신재생에너지 기업의 리스크 분석" 2012

    6 International Energy Agency, "World Energy Outlook 2010" 2010

    7 Baird, I. S., "What is risk anyway?, In Risk, Strategy, and Management" JAI Press 21-52, 1990

    8 Chan, L. K., "The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures" 56 : 2431-2456, 2001

    9 Yates, J. F., "The risk construct" Wiley 1-25, 1992

    10 Peters, M., "The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical chage- Does the locus of policies matter?" 2012

    11 Klaassen, G., "The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and in the United Kingdom" 54 (54): 227-240, 2002

    12 Loiter, J. M., "Technology push and renewable energy: public roles in the development of new energy technologies" 27 : 85-97, 1999

    13 Kobos, P. H., "Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for US renewable energy policy" 34 : 1645-1658, 2006

    14 Wustenhagen, R., "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research. Energy" 40 : 1-10, 2012

    15 McQueen, G., "Stock prices, news, and business conditions" 6 : 683-707, 1993

    16 Shapira, Z., "Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective" Russell Sage Foundation 1995

    17 Brealey, R., "Principles of Corporate Finance" McGraw- Hill 2000

    18 Henriques, I., "Oil prices and the stock prices of alternative energy companies" 30 (30): 998-1010, 2008

    19 Sadorsky, "Modeling renewable energy company risk" 40 : 39-48, 2012

    20 March, J. G., "Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking" 33 (33): 1404-1418, 1987

    21 Abell, J., "Macroeconomic influences on beta" 41 : 185-193, 1989

    22 Global Wind Energy Council, "Global Wind Energy Outlook 2010" 2010

    23 European Photovoltaic Industry Association, "Global Market Outlook for photovoltaics until 2016" 2012

    24 Lewis, J. I., "Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: An international comparision of wind industry policy support mechanism" 35 : 1844-1857, 2007

    25 Thomas, S., "Firm diversification and asymmetric information: Evidence from analysts’ forecasts and earnings announcements" 64 : 373-396, 2002

    26 Thoma M., "Explanation of industry returns using the variable beta model and lagged variable beta model" 8 : 35-45, 1995

    27 Caves R., "Efficiency in US Manufacturing Industries" Mit Press 1990

    28 Randy I. Anderson, "Does corporate diversification reduce firm risk? evidence from diversifying acquisitions" 14 (14): 485-504, 2011

    29 Low, P, "Diversification and capital structure: Some international evidence" 23 : 55-71, 2004

    30 Comment, R, "Corporate focus and stock returns" 37 : 67-87, 1995

    31 Hermalin, B., "Corporate diversification and agency costs" University of California, Berkeley 2003

    32 Sharpe, W. F, "Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk" 19 : 425-442, 1964

    33 Fama, E., "Business conditions and the expected returns on stocks and bonds" 25 : 23-50, 1989

    34 Chan, K, "An agency analysis of firm diversification: The consequences of discretionary cash and managerial risk considerations" 14 : 247-260, 2000

    35 Andrade, J., "An Empirical Model of the Brazilian Country Risk. An Extension of the Beta Country Risk Model" 38 : 1271-1278, 2006

    36 Project Management Institute, "A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge"

    37 수출입은행 해외경제연구실 산업투자조사실, "2012년 태양광 풍력산업 동향 및 해외진출 전략" 2012

    38 에너지기술평가원, "2010년도 에너지 R&D 통계 자료집"

    39 에너지관리공단 신재생에너지센터, "2010년 신재생에너지 보급 통계"

    40 에너지기술평가원, "2009 에너지 R&D 통계 자료집"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-07-27 학술지등록 한글명 : 자원환경경제연구
    외국어명 : Environmental and Resource Economics Review
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.45 0.45 0.45
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.47 0.45 0.778 0.04
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼