RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      國際聯合과 平和强制 序說  :  憲章第七章을 中心으로 = Introducion to The United Nations Peace-Enforcement

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19587103

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The political motive of United Nations is known to be stronger than the legal one, and it might, consequently, be unreasonable to foretell the future of the United Nations soley by looking at its legal side of the aspects.
      But, if I dare to draw a conclusion, the United Nations as an organization of peace-enforcement seems to have failed in establishing a complete and perfect system within itself; because, the Security Council is almost paralysed in the successful discharge of its primary responsiblity due to the evil existence of "droit de veto" provision. Besides, the lack of "accord spe´cial" have induced the Security Council to a nealy crippled body of a car without wheels, If there be any slight development found in the United Nations system of peace-enforcement, it is that the function and authority of the General Assembly is made a little more powerful than before. It is true that the impact of this fact cannot be undere stimated, and that the General Assembly has gained an incressed function and power, but we can not optimistically conclude that the United Nations itself has gained, as has been already investigated.
      Then, how can we achieve the world peace under the present system of the United Nations? I think we can solve the problem, if not perfectly, by allowing the General Assembly the possible maximum discretion in reaching decision needed to carry out the its secondary responsibility, in the case the Council fails to discharge the primary one entrusted. Of course, it is also true that the General Assembly does not have legal powers enough to mobilize those necessary measures to prevnt and supporess any illegal appeal to force. Yet, the General Assembly can effectively perform its duties only through the formation of a world-wide public opinion even the Great Powers can not easily ignore. And we can also expect the General Assembly will be able to play its best role in exerting all knids of political and economic pressures designed to prevent and sanction any illegal exercise of force.
      The way to peace is difficult, but our goal is not too far away. Rather, it is directly connected with the deep core of human mind itself. Just as the Preamble of UNESCO Charter declares manifestly, it is the human mind that war starts. If we sincerely hope to maintain peace in this world of ours, we should, first of all, begin to construct bulwark in our mind for ever-peaceful society.
      번역하기

      The political motive of United Nations is known to be stronger than the legal one, and it might, consequently, be unreasonable to foretell the future of the United Nations soley by looking at its legal side of the aspects. But, if I dare to draw a co...

      The political motive of United Nations is known to be stronger than the legal one, and it might, consequently, be unreasonable to foretell the future of the United Nations soley by looking at its legal side of the aspects.
      But, if I dare to draw a conclusion, the United Nations as an organization of peace-enforcement seems to have failed in establishing a complete and perfect system within itself; because, the Security Council is almost paralysed in the successful discharge of its primary responsiblity due to the evil existence of "droit de veto" provision. Besides, the lack of "accord spe´cial" have induced the Security Council to a nealy crippled body of a car without wheels, If there be any slight development found in the United Nations system of peace-enforcement, it is that the function and authority of the General Assembly is made a little more powerful than before. It is true that the impact of this fact cannot be undere stimated, and that the General Assembly has gained an incressed function and power, but we can not optimistically conclude that the United Nations itself has gained, as has been already investigated.
      Then, how can we achieve the world peace under the present system of the United Nations? I think we can solve the problem, if not perfectly, by allowing the General Assembly the possible maximum discretion in reaching decision needed to carry out the its secondary responsibility, in the case the Council fails to discharge the primary one entrusted. Of course, it is also true that the General Assembly does not have legal powers enough to mobilize those necessary measures to prevnt and supporess any illegal appeal to force. Yet, the General Assembly can effectively perform its duties only through the formation of a world-wide public opinion even the Great Powers can not easily ignore. And we can also expect the General Assembly will be able to play its best role in exerting all knids of political and economic pressures designed to prevent and sanction any illegal exercise of force.
      The way to peace is difficult, but our goal is not too far away. Rather, it is directly connected with the deep core of human mind itself. Just as the Preamble of UNESCO Charter declares manifestly, it is the human mind that war starts. If we sincerely hope to maintain peace in this world of ours, we should, first of all, begin to construct bulwark in our mind for ever-peaceful society.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 緖 論
      • 本 論
      • 序 言
      • 第一部 憲章의 原理와 內容
      • 第一節 憲章의 原理
      • 緖 論
      • 本 論
      • 序 言
      • 第一部 憲章의 原理와 內容
      • 第一節 憲章의 原理
      • 一. 侵略의 防止와 鎭壓
      • 二. 集團全體의 問題로서의 侵略
      • 三. 安全保障과 勢力均衡
      • 四. 國際聯合과 安全保障
      • 第二節 憲章의 內容
      • 第一項 總 說
      • 第二項 一般原則
      • 第一目 侵略의 決定과 措置
      • 一. 侵略의 決定
      • 二. 措置의 決定
      • 第二目 平和와 安全을 爲한『勸告』와『强制措置』와의 關係
      • 第三項 暫定措置
      • 一. 憲章의 規定
      • 二. 第三九條의 正式決定과의 關係
      • 三. 暫定措置의 法的性質
      • 四. 暫定措置의 法的效力
      • 第四項 强制措置
      • 第一目 國際聯盟의 制度
      • 第二目 國際聯合의 制度
      • 第三目 强制措置의 發動
      • 一. 非軍事的措置
      • 二. 軍事的措置
      • 第四目 兵力의 組織
      • 一. 特別協定
      • 二. 非理事國의 參加
      • 三. 空軍部隊의 緊急利用
      • 四. 軍事參謀委員會
      • 第五目 協力義務
      • 第五項 共同行動
      • 第二部 憲章制度의 發展
      • 第一目 韓國事變
      • 一. 侵略의 決定과 强制措置의 適用
      • 二. 韓國事變의 意義
      • 第二目 『平和를 爲한 團結』決議
      • 一. 決議의 內容
      • 二. 法的考察
      • 三. 結語
      • 第三部 國際聯合과 平和强制의 限界
      • 第一目 平和强制의 內因的限界
      • 第二目 平和强制의 外因的限界
      • 結 論
      • Re´sume´
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼