RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      Hydrothermal stability of different zeolites in supercritical water: Implication for synthesis of supported catalysts by supercritical water impregnation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105907034

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Supercritical water (SCW) impregnation is an efficient and feasible method that has been used to prepare highly dispersed supported catalysts, but few studies have investigated the stability of support materials in supercritical water. Thus, our aim was to investigate the hydrothermal stability of zeolite supports (ZSM-5, TS-1, ZSM-35, HY, 13X, Beta, SAPO-11 and SAPO-34) as model compounds in supercritical water. Results showed that almost all of zeolites suffered from crystallinity change, structural properties degradation, obvious desilication and dealumination. The decrease of surface areas and the collapse of crystalline structures in HY, 13X, Beta, SAPO-11 and SAPO-34 were more serious compared to ZSM-5, ZSM-35 and TS-1. The micropore areas and acidity of all SCW-treated zeolites were reduced. 13X with lower Si/Al ratio had higher hydrothermal stability than HY due to the formation of extra-framework Al (EFAL). EFAl also generated strong Lewis acid sites determined by ammonia temperature-programmed desorption and 27Al magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance. Desilication and dealumination were simultaneous, and led to the increase of framework Si/Al ratio. ZSM zeolites (ZSM-5, ZSM-35 and TS-1) had higher hydrothermal stability than HY, 13X, Beta, SAPO-11 and SAPO-34 in SCW.
      번역하기

      Supercritical water (SCW) impregnation is an efficient and feasible method that has been used to prepare highly dispersed supported catalysts, but few studies have investigated the stability of support materials in supercritical water. Thus, our aim w...

      Supercritical water (SCW) impregnation is an efficient and feasible method that has been used to prepare highly dispersed supported catalysts, but few studies have investigated the stability of support materials in supercritical water. Thus, our aim was to investigate the hydrothermal stability of zeolite supports (ZSM-5, TS-1, ZSM-35, HY, 13X, Beta, SAPO-11 and SAPO-34) as model compounds in supercritical water. Results showed that almost all of zeolites suffered from crystallinity change, structural properties degradation, obvious desilication and dealumination. The decrease of surface areas and the collapse of crystalline structures in HY, 13X, Beta, SAPO-11 and SAPO-34 were more serious compared to ZSM-5, ZSM-35 and TS-1. The micropore areas and acidity of all SCW-treated zeolites were reduced. 13X with lower Si/Al ratio had higher hydrothermal stability than HY due to the formation of extra-framework Al (EFAL). EFAl also generated strong Lewis acid sites determined by ammonia temperature-programmed desorption and 27Al magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance. Desilication and dealumination were simultaneous, and led to the increase of framework Si/Al ratio. ZSM zeolites (ZSM-5, ZSM-35 and TS-1) had higher hydrothermal stability than HY, 13X, Beta, SAPO-11 and SAPO-34 in SCW.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 K. Sue, 5 : 659-, 2003

      2 W. Lutz, 12 : 131-, 1997

      3 T. Adschiri, 13 : 1380-, 2011

      4 A. Aimable, 190 : 99-, 2009

      5 J.W. Lee, 55 : 3051-, 2010

      6 D. Rangappa, 10 : 11-, 2010

      7 H. Li, 57 : 117-, 2011

      8 M. Hosseinpour, 107 : 479-, 2016

      9 K. J. Ziegler, 123 : 7797-, 2001

      10 J. Otsu, 33 : 61-, 2005

      1 K. Sue, 5 : 659-, 2003

      2 W. Lutz, 12 : 131-, 1997

      3 T. Adschiri, 13 : 1380-, 2011

      4 A. Aimable, 190 : 99-, 2009

      5 J.W. Lee, 55 : 3051-, 2010

      6 D. Rangappa, 10 : 11-, 2010

      7 H. Li, 57 : 117-, 2011

      8 M. Hosseinpour, 107 : 479-, 2016

      9 K. J. Ziegler, 123 : 7797-, 2001

      10 J. Otsu, 33 : 61-, 2005

      11 O. Sawai, 47 : 240-, 2008

      12 O. Sawai, 43 : 2293-, 2008

      13 D. Zhao, 60 : 3544-, 2006

      14 C. B. Xu, 39 : 135-, 2006

      15 B. Qiu, 25 : 591-, 2011

      16 J.C. Wang, 213 : 184-, 2012

      17 K. S. Lin, 39 : 1385-, 1999

      18 K. S. Lin, 16 : 2627-, 2000

      19 K. S. Lin, 22 : 261-, 1999

      20 N. Mo, 102 : 73-, 2015

      21 P.G. Duan, 116 : 105-, 2016

      22 K. Tomita, 41 : 3341-, 2002

      23 Y. J. Lu, 67 : 125-, 2014

      24 Y. Karakus, 38 : 7298-, 2013

      25 M. Akizuki, 84 : 36-, 2013

      26 N. Kometani, 120 : 443-, 2017

      27 A. Ashraf, 76 : 32-, 2013

      28 Y. Matsumura, 35 : 819-, 1997

      29 F. Salvador, 74 : 1-, 2013

      30 G. Beaucage, 37 : 523-, 2004

      31 T. Li, 41 : 21883-, 2016

      32 D.P. Serrano, 54 : 1-, 2007

      33 Y. Liu, 112 : 1226-, 2008

      34 M.B. Abda, 234 : 200-, 2016

      35 S. Kumar, 154 : 115-, 2000

      36 A.K. Jamil, 120 : 22918-, 2016

      37 W. Lutz, 132 : 31-, 2010

      38 L. H. Ding, 101 : 432-, 2007

      39 R.M. Ravenelle, 114 : 19582-, 2010

      40 J. Wang, 18 : 468-, 2008

      41 K. S.W. Sing, 57 : 603-, 1985

      42 A.M. Puziy, 45 : 1941-, 2007

      43 L.K.G. Bhatta, 54 : 10876-, 2015

      44 J. Aguado, 85 : 352-, 2009

      45 D. P. Serrano, 79 : 456-, 2007

      46 E. Dumitriu, 43 : 341-, 2001

      47 F. Lonyi, 373 : 53-, 2001

      48 F. Lonyi, 47 : 293-, 2001

      49 F. Frusteri, 176 : 522-, 2015

      50 M.A. Ali, 252 : 149-, 2003

      51 P. Wang, 125 : 155-, 2007

      52 M. P. Moises, 4 : 48576-, 2014

      53 K.V.V. S.B. S.R. Murthy, 17 : 185-, 2010

      54 D.R.C. Huybrechts, 71 : 129-, 1992

      55 K. F. Lin, 72 : 193-, 2004

      56 J. Datka, 19 : 159-, 1993

      57 I. Hannus, 17 : 157-, 1998

      58 K. Sue, 8 : 634-, 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2016-06-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering -> Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering -> Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-09-27 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Institute Of Chemical Engineers -> The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers KCI등재
      2007-09-03 학술지명변경 한글명 : The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineeri -> The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineeri -> The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.92 0.72 1.4
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.15 0.94 0.403 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼