RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    김대중 정부의 대북정책에 대한 비판적 해석 남남갈등의 쟁점을 중심으로 = A Critical Abroach to Kim Dae Jung Administration’s North Korea Policy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5017037

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Both South and North Korea have to minimize the waste of the national energy, rather to try to maximize it in pursue of survival and prosperity of Koreans. What can we do for this? To answer the question is we should not hesitate to continue taking the path of the reconciliation and cooperation between the two Koreas. Thus Sunshine Policy must be supported in the long term until it results out with success. Accordingly the Kim Dae Jung administration should figure out the best ways that keep long-term Sunshine Policy persisting, by taking other suggestions and criticism into consideration when policy decision making. The most serious and urgent matter is to get over the domestic conflicts of the perspectives toward the North Korea policy. Here are my suggestions to dissolve those conflicts as follows- first, forget about the unification itself, and it will work; second, take no advantages of the North Korea policy for the political purpose at home; third, promote Sunshine Policy as “moderate”; fourth, enhance the domestic economic strength; and finally, mutual existence within the South before mutual existence between South and North Korea.
    번역하기

    Both South and North Korea have to minimize the waste of the national energy, rather to try to maximize it in pursue of survival and prosperity of Koreans. What can we do for this? To answer the question is we should not hesitate to continue taking th...

    Both South and North Korea have to minimize the waste of the national energy, rather to try to maximize it in pursue of survival and prosperity of Koreans. What can we do for this? To answer the question is we should not hesitate to continue taking the path of the reconciliation and cooperation between the two Koreas. Thus Sunshine Policy must be supported in the long term until it results out with success. Accordingly the Kim Dae Jung administration should figure out the best ways that keep long-term Sunshine Policy persisting, by taking other suggestions and criticism into consideration when policy decision making. The most serious and urgent matter is to get over the domestic conflicts of the perspectives toward the North Korea policy. Here are my suggestions to dissolve those conflicts as follows- first, forget about the unification itself, and it will work; second, take no advantages of the North Korea policy for the political purpose at home; third, promote Sunshine Policy as “moderate”; fourth, enhance the domestic economic strength; and finally, mutual existence within the South before mutual existence between South and North Korea.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼