RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    A.M. Best와 CAMEL제도를 원용한 국내 손해보험산업 평가에 관한 연구 = (A study on the Assessing the Strength of Domestic P/L Insurers by Using Rating Techniques)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104131430

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to assess the financial strength of domestic property-liability insurers by using Best's rating and CAMEL techniques. Four year financial data of ten domestic non-life insurers are selected as examples. A quantitative evaluation of 10 domestic insurers' financial strength and operating performance relative to the Best's top group is carried out. The quantitative evaluation is done in 5 key areas; growth, efficiency, profitability, safety, and liquidity.
    Even if there are some differences in assessing the financial strength between two techniques, this study indicates that the ten domestic insurers have to improve profitability and efficiency areas to endure as a competitive going-concern. Domestic insurers should have a strong financial structure with quality management. They should strive to strengthen financial soundness through profitability and efficiency. It also provides evidence that there is a big gap between domestic large insurers and small insures in all areas. Therefore, small domestic insurers especially, should focus on long-term management objective and should be concerned with competition by the market share and with operation efficiency and profitability.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to assess the financial strength of domestic property-liability insurers by using Best's rating and CAMEL techniques. Four year financial data of ten domestic non-life insurers are selected as examples. A quantitative eval...

    The purpose of this paper is to assess the financial strength of domestic property-liability insurers by using Best's rating and CAMEL techniques. Four year financial data of ten domestic non-life insurers are selected as examples. A quantitative evaluation of 10 domestic insurers' financial strength and operating performance relative to the Best's top group is carried out. The quantitative evaluation is done in 5 key areas; growth, efficiency, profitability, safety, and liquidity.
    Even if there are some differences in assessing the financial strength between two techniques, this study indicates that the ten domestic insurers have to improve profitability and efficiency areas to endure as a competitive going-concern. Domestic insurers should have a strong financial structure with quality management. They should strive to strengthen financial soundness through profitability and efficiency. It also provides evidence that there is a big gap between domestic large insurers and small insures in all areas. Therefore, small domestic insurers especially, should focus on long-term management objective and should be concerned with competition by the market share and with operation efficiency and profitability.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "세계 손해보험회사 경영평가" 2001

    2 "보험회사 부문별 및 산업별 CRM 성공요인에 관한 실증연구" 2002

    3 "보험회사 경영평가의 개선방안" 4 : 1994

    4 "보험기업 경영진단시스템 개발" 보험개발원 1998

    5 "다변량 통계자료 분석" 자유아카데미 1997

    6 "국내 손해보험사의 경영평가와 시사점" 보험개발원 2003

    7 "국내 생명보험회사의 CAMEL식 경영평가제도 유효성에 관한 연구" 62 : 1-29, 2002

    8 "and Capital Flows in Insurance Markets Journal of Financial Intermediation" 3-38, 1977

    9 "Using the NAIC Insurance Regulatory Information System" P&L Edition 1994

    10 "Solvency Monitoring in the Twenty-First Century" 13 : 1995

    1 "세계 손해보험회사 경영평가" 2001

    2 "보험회사 부문별 및 산업별 CRM 성공요인에 관한 실증연구" 2002

    3 "보험회사 경영평가의 개선방안" 4 : 1994

    4 "보험기업 경영진단시스템 개발" 보험개발원 1998

    5 "다변량 통계자료 분석" 자유아카데미 1997

    6 "국내 손해보험사의 경영평가와 시사점" 보험개발원 2003

    7 "국내 생명보험회사의 CAMEL식 경영평가제도 유효성에 관한 연구" 62 : 1-29, 2002

    8 "and Capital Flows in Insurance Markets Journal of Financial Intermediation" 3-38, 1977

    9 "Using the NAIC Insurance Regulatory Information System" P&L Edition 1994

    10 "Solvency Monitoring in the Twenty-First Century" 13 : 1995

    11 "Reinsurance and the management of Regulatory Ratios and Taxes in the Property-Casualty Insurance Industry" 22 : 207-240, 1996

    12 "Quantative Analysis Report, Best's Aggregate and Averages" Property-Casualty Edition 2002

    13 "Property/Casualty Insurance Ratings Criteria" 1999

    14 "Property-Liability Insurer Financial Strength Ratings: Differences Across Rating Agencies" 66 : 621-643, 1999

    15 "Financial Ratios and Prior Probability in Solvency Prediction Journal of Risk and Insurance" 229-244, 1988

    16 "Best's Key Rating Guide, Property-Casualty Edition" Best Co., Inc. 1996

    17 "A Description of Their Methods and Procedures" Insurance Company Rating agencies

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.49 0.49 0.64
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.62 0.65 1.184 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼