Almost prior studies conducted on the positive or negative effects of book-tax conformity (hereinafter BTC) have assumed the same level of BTC for all firms in the same country(or industry), and so have the limitation that inter-country(or inter...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107382786
신승묘 (인하대학교)
2020
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
79-101(23쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Almost prior studies conducted on the positive or negative effects of book-tax conformity (hereinafter BTC) have assumed the same level of BTC for all firms in the same country(or industry), and so have the limitation that inter-country(or inter...
Almost prior studies conducted on the positive or negative effects of book-tax conformity (hereinafter BTC) have assumed the same level of BTC for all firms in the same country(or industry), and so have the limitation that inter-country(or inter-industry) differences in accounting environment may have affected their empirical results. However, BTC level would vary from firm to firm, which is expected to be affected by the firm’s characteristic factors. Accordingly, this study measures individual firm’s BTC using time-series data from the individual firm, and then tested research hypotheses on factors affecting the BTC for individual firms.
In order to test the research hypotheses for firms listed on the Korean stock market, the t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and regression analysis were conducted, and the main results are as follows. First, the higher the BTC for firms that are more profitable and with the more cash flows from operations, and the lower the BTC for firms with net loss. Second, the lower the BTC for firms with more facility assets and the higher debt ratio, and the higher the BTC for the larger firms.
These empirical results suggest that the BTC measure used in this study adequately reflect the BTC levels of individual firms, and therefore it is needed to expand the subject or scope of empirical research on the positive or negative effects of BTC by using the BTC measure for individual firms.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 한봉희, "회계이익 변수에 대한 극단치처리 방법의 비교분석" 한국경영학회 30 (30): 47-73, 2001
2 신승묘, "회계-세법의 일치성이 회계이익의 지속성 및 미래현금흐름과의 관련성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 43 (43): 1-36, 2018
3 박희진, "재무이익-세무이익의 일치성, 보고이익 차이의 일관성과 이익의 정보효과" 한국회계학회 40 (40): 171-223, 2015
4 구자은, "세법과 회계기준 일치정도가 이익지속성 및 조세회피에 미치는 영향" 한국세무학회 30 (30): 99-138, 2013
5 김임현, "산업별 재무이익-세무이익 일치성과 조세회피" 한국세무학회 34 (34): 77-105, 2017
6 Chan, K., "Will a Departure from Tax-based Accounting Encourage Tax Noncompliance? Archival Evidence from a Transition Economy" 50 (50): 58-73, 2010
7 Carnahan, I., "Two Birds, One Stone:Would Firms Inflate Earnings if It Meant More Taxes?" 169 : 40-, 2002
8 Lang, M., "Transparency, Liquidity and Valuation : International Evidence on When Transparency Matters Most" 50 (50): 729-774, 2012
9 Desai, M., "The Degradation of Reported Corporate Profits" 19 (19): 171-193, 2005
10 Blaylock, B., "The Association between Book-tax Conformity and Earnings Management" 20 (20): 141-172, 2015
1 한봉희, "회계이익 변수에 대한 극단치처리 방법의 비교분석" 한국경영학회 30 (30): 47-73, 2001
2 신승묘, "회계-세법의 일치성이 회계이익의 지속성 및 미래현금흐름과의 관련성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 43 (43): 1-36, 2018
3 박희진, "재무이익-세무이익의 일치성, 보고이익 차이의 일관성과 이익의 정보효과" 한국회계학회 40 (40): 171-223, 2015
4 구자은, "세법과 회계기준 일치정도가 이익지속성 및 조세회피에 미치는 영향" 한국세무학회 30 (30): 99-138, 2013
5 김임현, "산업별 재무이익-세무이익 일치성과 조세회피" 한국세무학회 34 (34): 77-105, 2017
6 Chan, K., "Will a Departure from Tax-based Accounting Encourage Tax Noncompliance? Archival Evidence from a Transition Economy" 50 (50): 58-73, 2010
7 Carnahan, I., "Two Birds, One Stone:Would Firms Inflate Earnings if It Meant More Taxes?" 169 : 40-, 2002
8 Lang, M., "Transparency, Liquidity and Valuation : International Evidence on When Transparency Matters Most" 50 (50): 729-774, 2012
9 Desai, M., "The Degradation of Reported Corporate Profits" 19 (19): 171-193, 2005
10 Blaylock, B., "The Association between Book-tax Conformity and Earnings Management" 20 (20): 141-172, 2015
11 Desai, M, "Tax Policy and the Economy 17" MIT Press 169-206, 2003
12 Lisowski, P., "Seeking Shelter : Empirically Modelling Tax Shelters Using Financial Statement Information" 85 (85): 1693-1720, 2010
13 Joint Committee on Taxation, "Present Law and Background Relating to Corporate Tax Reform: Issues of Conforming Book and Tax Income and Capital Cost Recovery (May 8)"
14 Hamilton, A., "Olson Argues for Eliminating Some Book-tax Reporting Differences" 1935-1936, 2003
15 Murray, A., "Narrowing Tax Gap Should Be Priority of Next Congress"
16 Atwood, T. J., "Home Country Tax System Characteristics and Corporate Tax Avoidance : International Evidence" 87 (87): 1831-1860, 2012
17 Yin, G., "Getting Serious about Corporate Tax Shelters : Taking a Lesson from History" 54 : 209-237, 2001
18 Guenther, D., "Financial Reporting, Tax Costs, and Book-Tax Conformity" 23 (23): 225-248, 1997
19 Hanlon, M., "Evidence on the Possible Information Loss of Conforming Book Income and Taxable Income" 48 (48): 407-442, 2005
20 Ali, A., "Country-specific Factors Related to Financial Reporting and the Relevance of Accounting Data" 38 (38): 1-21, 2000
21 Whitaker, C., "Bridging the Book-Tax Accounting Gap" 115 : 680-726, 2005
22 Atwood, T. J., "Book-Tax Conformity, Earnings Persistence and the Association between Earnings and Future Cash Flows" 50 (50): 111-125, 2010
23 Hanlon, M., "An Unintended Consequence of Book-Tax Conformity:A Loss of Earnings Informativeness" 46 (46): 294-311, 2008
24 Wilson, R., "An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants" 84 (84): 969-999, 2009
25 Hung, M., "Accounting Standards and Value Relevance of Financial Statements : An International Analysis" 30 (30): 401-420, 2001
26 Graetz, M, "A Fair and Balanced Tax System for the Twenty-first Century, Toward Fundamental Tax Reform" The AEI Press 48-69, 2005
Income Shifting and Tax Avoidance of Korean Business Groups using Related Party Transactions
취득세의 법적 성질론에 관한 소고-부동산에 대한 취득세를 중심으로-
기업수명주기별 최저한세 납부기업의 회계정보 질적 특성 분석
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 1999-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.03 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.37 | 1.48 | 1.713 | 0.03 |