The definition of flatness is given by ISO. ANSI, KS. etc. but those standards don't mention about the specific methods for the flatness. So various solution models that are based on the Minimum Zone Method have been proposed as an optimizati...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3429174
2000
Korean
평면도 ; 최소 영역법 ; 유전자 알고리듬 ; 심플렉스 방법 ; Flatness ; Minimum Zone Method ; Genetic Algorithm ; Simplex Method
500.000
KCI등재후보
학술저널
27-34(8쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The definition of flatness is given by ISO. ANSI, KS. etc. but those standards don't mention about the specific methods for the flatness. So various solution models that are based on the Minimum Zone Method have been proposed as an optimizati...
The definition of flatness is given by ISO. ANSI, KS. etc. but those
standards don't mention about the specific methods for the flatness. So
various solution models that are based on the Minimum Zone Method have
been proposed as an optimization problem for the minimax curve fitting.
But it has been rare to compare some optimization algorithms to make a
guideline for choosing better algorithms in this field. Hence this paper
examined and compared Genetic Algorithm and Simplex Method to the
evaluation of flatness. As a result. Genetic Algorithm gave the better or
equal flatness than Simplx Method but it has the inefficiency caused from
the large number of iteration. Therefore, in the future. another
researches about alternative algorithms including Hybrid Genetic Algorithm
should be achieved to improve the efficiency of Genetic Algorithm for the
evaluation of flatness.
2차 분사의 위치 변화에 따른 로켓노즐 출구에서의 추력 분포 변화
NACA 0015 익형에 대한 Gurney 플랩의 영향
저사이클 피로수명에 영향을 미치는 구상흑연주철의 흑연입자수의 영향