종합건설면허대여에 의한 하도급판례연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In case that a subcontractor has a direct claim for payment to a housebuilder, it is important whether a subcontractor has the priority to an execution creditor of a contractor or not in a general subcontract.
By the way, it is important to ascertain who is a contracting party of a contract in case of a subcontract used by a license rental. The High Court and the Supreme Court of Korea have accepted and applied the theory of a interpretation on a legal action in ascertaining a contracting party in case of a subcontract used by a license rental. However, the conclusions are different each other. In my opinion the theory of a interpretation on a legal action has a flexible and wide range of applications. I’d like to agree on the theory of a interpretation on a legal action in spite of it’s legal instability.
In case of a subcontract used by a license rental, the contracting party is not a performer of a deed but the nominal person according to the theory of a interpretation on a legal action. A juristic act between the contracting parties of a subcontract used by a license rental is generally effective according to a so-called ‘a puppet theory’.
I discussed a direct claim for payment of a subcontractor to a housebuilder. The High Court of Korea said that an order of attachment by a contractor’s creditor is not effective, because the parties agree that a claim for the cost of construction belongs only to a subcontractor. However, the Supreme Court of Korea says that it depends on the intention of the parties whether the subcontractor has the priority to an execution creditor of a contractor or not. I agree to the precedent of the Supreme Court of Korea, considering the article 14(1) and 14(2) of the Fair Transactions in Subcontract Act.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 면허대여에 의한 하도급판례 개관
• Ⅲ. 판례에 대한 검토
• Ⅳ. 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김현석, "하수급인의 공사대금 직접청구권과 채권가압류" 민사판례연구회 (27) : 341-408, 2005

2 이범상, "하도급대금 직접지급청구권과 공사도급채무의 소멸시기와 범위" (3255) : 2008

3 이준현, "하도급거래에 있어서의 수급사업자의 발주자에 대한 하도급대금 직접지급 청구권" 법조협회 56 (56): 36-81, 2007

4 정순영, "하도급거래 공정화에 관한 법률 일부개정법률안(박명광의원 대표발의) 검토보고서" 2006

5 김홍우, "하도금거래공정화에 관한 법률상 수급사업자의 직접청구권과 공동수급체의 법률관계" 건설재판실무논단 2006

6 이은영, "채권각론(제4판)" 박영사 2004

7 이시윤, "신민사소송법(제5판)" 박영사 2009

8 송덕수, "신민법사례연습" 박영사 2008

9 곽윤직, "민법총칙(제7판)" 박영사 2002

10 이영준, "민법총칙" 박영사 1991

11 곽윤직, "민법주해 Ⅱ" 박영사 2000

12 곽종훈, "명의대여에 의한 대출약정과 통정허위표시" 12 : 2003

13 김진우, "도급계약에 있어 계약 당사자의 확정과 계약인수" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 259-300, 2008

14 윤진수, "계약당사자의 확정에 관한 고찰, in: 민법논고 Ⅰ" 박영사 2007

15 안승훈, "계약당사자를 결정하기 위한 법률행위의 해석방법과 통정허위표시이론의 관계 - 명의대여약정에 의한 타인명의의 법률행위에 있어 행위자가 계약의 당사자로 인정되는 경우의 법률관계를 중심으로" 법조협회 55 (55): 245-268, 2006

16 윤재윤, "건설분쟁관계법" 박영사 2003

17 "Larenz, Allgemeiner Teil des deutschen Bürgerlichen Rechts, 7.Aufl"

18 Palandt Kommentar, "Bügerliches Gesetzbuch, 68. Aufl"