유도 코치의 지도유형과 선수만족도의 관계 = The relationship between the judo coach's teaching types and the judo player's satisfaction

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The current study aims to elevate players' satisfaction based on the basic data of the research by analyzing the general teaching types of leaders being engaged in the judo coach job and to be of help to enhance their leadership by providing necessary data which might be of help to boost performance in sports.
In order to achieve these purposes, the survey was conducted with 177 players who won a prize more than once in national judo games for the recent 5 years among male and female college players nationwide who were registered in Korea Judo Association at the moment and for more detailed data collection, this researcher visited in person the judo stadium of the 90th National Sports Festival in Daejeon and conducted a survey.
So as to analyze the collected data, test of differences (t-test), One-Way ANOVA and Post-Hoc Test (Scheffe) were made, and in order to examine the relationship between teaching types and players' satisfaction, correlation analysis was made. In addition, to examine the effect of the coach's teaching types on players' satisfaction, multiple regression analysis was made. The findings analyzed by these research methods and procedures are as follows:
First, there are differences in teaching types depending on judo players and coaches' personal characteristics. If these results are examined in concrete, it appeared that for sex distinction of judo players, the teaching propensities such as training, democratic, socially supportive, and rewarding behaviors are more evident with female groups over males. In relation to the coach age, the teaching propensity such as training and socially supportive behaviors appeared to be higher in groups in their 30s than those in their 20s. On the contrary, it appeared that there was no difference in the authoritative behavior between groups.
Second, the coaches' teaching types and players' satisfaction are related with each other. If these results are examined in concrete, it appeared that players' satisfaction was positively correlated with training, democratic, socially supportive and rewarding behaviors out of teaching types. On the contrary, it appeared there was no correlation between the authoritative behavior and players' satisfaction.
Third, coaches' teaching types affect players' satisfaction. If these results are examined in concrete, it appeared that rewarding behaviors had a positive (+) effect on human relations between players, and democratic behaviors had a positive (+) effect on satisfaction with players' life. On the contrary, it appeared that the authoritative behavior had a negative (-) effect on the needs satisfaction with players' life.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
• 2. 연구목적 = 3
• 3. 연구가설 = 3
• 4. 연구모형 = 3
• 5. 용어의 정의 = 4
• 6. 연구의 제한점 = 5
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 7
• 1. 유도의 기원 및 특성 = 7
• 2. 코치의 특성 = 9
• 3. 지도자의 리더십 유형 = 11
• 4. 지도유형 = 15
• 5. 선수만족도 = 18
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 20
• 1. 연구대상 = 20
• 2. 조사도구 = 21
• 3. 자료처리방법 = 23
• Ⅳ. 연구결과 = 24
• 1. 유도 선수와 코치의 개인적 특성에 따른 지도유형의 차이 = 24
• 2. 유도 코치의 지도유형과 선수만족도의 관계 = 27
• 3. 유도 코치의 지도유형이 선수만족도에 미치는 영향 = 27
• Ⅴ. 논의 = 30
• 1. 유도 선수와 코치의 개인적 특성에 따른 지도유형의 차이 = 30
• 2. 유도 코치의 지도유형과 선수만족도의 관계 = 31
• 3. 유도 코치의 지도유형이 선수만족도에 미치는 영향 = 32
• Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언 = 34
• 1. 결론 = 34
• 2. 제언 = 35
• 참고문헌 = 37
• ABSTRACT = 40
• 부록 = 42