RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      항상소득과 비인적자산이 주택점유에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Permanent Income and Non-Human Capital Asset on the Housing Tenureship

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101790478

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to identify which is the better indicator to forcast housing tenureship between permanent income and current income, and study the effects of non-human capital asset on housing tenureship. To forcast permanent income, a statistic regression equation is used with current income as the dependent variable. Multi-nomial logistic model is used to forcast the housing tenureship Using current income as the dependent variable delivered a more accurate result than using permanent income. Current income is used as a dependent variable and sex, age, education and occupation are used as independent variables to forcast permanent income. Non-human capital asset is also used as an independent variable. Also, excluding non-human capital asset variable when forcasting bothe permanent income and housing tenureship proved to be more accurate. Because permanent income, the sum of future income and current asset, is a good indicator of current consumption including housing, the result with permanent income should be more accurate than the forcast using current income. This implies an underdevelopment of a housing mortgage system that enables people to consume now on the basis of their future income. The Korea's unique Chonsei housing rental system has also made it difficult to forcast housing tenureship based on people's permanent income and asset. While, the Key-money of Chonsei housing and the housing asset of homeowners with debt are very similar in their amount, the result is completely different. One is a renter and the other is a homeowner.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to identify which is the better indicator to forcast housing tenureship between permanent income and current income, and study the effects of non-human capital asset on housing tenureship. To forcast permanent income, a st...

      The purpose of this study is to identify which is the better indicator to forcast housing tenureship between permanent income and current income, and study the effects of non-human capital asset on housing tenureship. To forcast permanent income, a statistic regression equation is used with current income as the dependent variable. Multi-nomial logistic model is used to forcast the housing tenureship Using current income as the dependent variable delivered a more accurate result than using permanent income. Current income is used as a dependent variable and sex, age, education and occupation are used as independent variables to forcast permanent income. Non-human capital asset is also used as an independent variable. Also, excluding non-human capital asset variable when forcasting bothe permanent income and housing tenureship proved to be more accurate. Because permanent income, the sum of future income and current asset, is a good indicator of current consumption including housing, the result with permanent income should be more accurate than the forcast using current income. This implies an underdevelopment of a housing mortgage system that enables people to consume now on the basis of their future income. The Korea's unique Chonsei housing rental system has also made it difficult to forcast housing tenureship based on people's permanent income and asset. While, the Key-money of Chonsei housing and the housing asset of homeowners with debt are very similar in their amount, the result is completely different. One is a renter and the other is a homeowner.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최막중, "주택금융의 활성화가 가구의 주택수요에 미치는 영향" 36 (36): 85-99, 2001

      2 최막중, "주택금융 제약이 주택소비규모와 점유형태 선택에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증분석" 한국주택학회 10 (10): 33-48, 2002

      3 이상일, "전세와 보증부월세간 선택요인과 주거수요 편차" 한국주택학회 14 (14): 139-164, 2006

      4 최유미, "서울시 가구특성별 주거선택 요인에 관한 연구 - 1996년부터 2006년까지 변화특성을 중심으로-" 대한국토·도시계획학회 43 (43): 195-210, 2008

      5 정의철, "도시가구의 주택점유형태 및 주택유형선택에 관한 연구" 한국주택학회 10 (10): 5-31, 2002

      6 김정수, "가구특성에 따른 주택선택행태에 관한 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 39 (39): 191-204, 2004

      7 Ioannides,Yannis M., "Residential Mobility and Housing Tenure Choice" 17 : 265-287, 1987

      8 Goodman, "Permanent Income, Hedonic Prices, and Demand for Housing: New Evidence" 12 : 214-237, 1982

      9 Oh,Jeungil, "Income,Wealth,and Housing Tenure Choice in Korea" 36 (36): 273-286, 2001

      10 Dynarski, "Housing Purchases and Transitory Income: A Study with Panel Data" 67 : 195-204, 1985

      1 최막중, "주택금융의 활성화가 가구의 주택수요에 미치는 영향" 36 (36): 85-99, 2001

      2 최막중, "주택금융 제약이 주택소비규모와 점유형태 선택에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증분석" 한국주택학회 10 (10): 33-48, 2002

      3 이상일, "전세와 보증부월세간 선택요인과 주거수요 편차" 한국주택학회 14 (14): 139-164, 2006

      4 최유미, "서울시 가구특성별 주거선택 요인에 관한 연구 - 1996년부터 2006년까지 변화특성을 중심으로-" 대한국토·도시계획학회 43 (43): 195-210, 2008

      5 정의철, "도시가구의 주택점유형태 및 주택유형선택에 관한 연구" 한국주택학회 10 (10): 5-31, 2002

      6 김정수, "가구특성에 따른 주택선택행태에 관한 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 39 (39): 191-204, 2004

      7 Ioannides,Yannis M., "Residential Mobility and Housing Tenure Choice" 17 : 265-287, 1987

      8 Goodman, "Permanent Income, Hedonic Prices, and Demand for Housing: New Evidence" 12 : 214-237, 1982

      9 Oh,Jeungil, "Income,Wealth,and Housing Tenure Choice in Korea" 36 (36): 273-286, 2001

      10 Dynarski, "Housing Purchases and Transitory Income: A Study with Panel Data" 67 : 195-204, 1985

      11 Goodman, "Econometric Model od Housing Price, Permanent Income, Tenure Choice, and Housing Demand" 23 : 327-353, 1988

      12 Polinsky, A. M., "An Empirical Reconciliation of Micro and Grouped Estimates of the Demand for Housing" 51 : 199-205, 1979

      13 Henderson, J. V., "A Model of Housing Tenure Choice" 73 : 98-113, 1983

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.52 0.52 0.51
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.54 0.53 0.797 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼