RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      근대, 자연, 경험: 미학사적 개관을 통한 미적 자연 및 자연의 미적 경험의 몇 가지특이성에 대한 고찰 = Modern, Nature, Experience-Historical and theoretical considerations of several particularities of aesthetic nature as well as aesthetic experience of nature-

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper aims to identify the limit, that is, the one-sidedness of ``modern aesthetics of nature`` through a short glimpse of the western history of aesthetics as well as the cultural history of nature, and then tentatively to suggest a solution to overcome such a problem. The beauty, the sublime, and the picturesque as aesthetic categories in aesthetics of nature that were finally established in the late 18th century, appear to implicitly presuppose some sort of act of static contemplation in regard to aesthetic nature. Our ordinary aesthetic experiences of nature, however, might not always take place in such an ``idealized aesthetic situation``. Were it acknowledged that in numerous cases we encounter and experience aesthetic nature in such an ordinary circumstances dynamically consisted of and combined with subjective as well as objective moments, then the types of modern aesthetic experience of nature where a kind of long-distanced quiet contemplation might take place, and, furthermore, the modern aesthetic categories, which correspond to such types, would all have to lose their own previous well-trodden base. The subjective as well as objective moments as ``point of view`` and ``spatial position`` of aesthetic subject and even ``time`` of aesthetic appreciation of nature, were all regarded and neglected as insignificant, irrelevant, and peripheral for aesthetic experience and therefore theoretically excluded from consideration so far. These moments in such aesthetic experience of nature, however, play qualitatively a more decisive role than in that of artwork. The ``review`` of such so-called secondary moments and the ``criticism`` of the one-sidedness of modern aesthetics of nature through that review, all must also jump off from some kind of generous recognition of the ``aesthetic diversity of nature`` dynamically encountered in various ordinary circumstances.
      번역하기

      This paper aims to identify the limit, that is, the one-sidedness of ``modern aesthetics of nature`` through a short glimpse of the western history of aesthetics as well as the cultural history of nature, and then tentatively to suggest a solution to ...

      This paper aims to identify the limit, that is, the one-sidedness of ``modern aesthetics of nature`` through a short glimpse of the western history of aesthetics as well as the cultural history of nature, and then tentatively to suggest a solution to overcome such a problem. The beauty, the sublime, and the picturesque as aesthetic categories in aesthetics of nature that were finally established in the late 18th century, appear to implicitly presuppose some sort of act of static contemplation in regard to aesthetic nature. Our ordinary aesthetic experiences of nature, however, might not always take place in such an ``idealized aesthetic situation``. Were it acknowledged that in numerous cases we encounter and experience aesthetic nature in such an ordinary circumstances dynamically consisted of and combined with subjective as well as objective moments, then the types of modern aesthetic experience of nature where a kind of long-distanced quiet contemplation might take place, and, furthermore, the modern aesthetic categories, which correspond to such types, would all have to lose their own previous well-trodden base. The subjective as well as objective moments as ``point of view`` and ``spatial position`` of aesthetic subject and even ``time`` of aesthetic appreciation of nature, were all regarded and neglected as insignificant, irrelevant, and peripheral for aesthetic experience and therefore theoretically excluded from consideration so far. These moments in such aesthetic experience of nature, however, play qualitatively a more decisive role than in that of artwork. The ``review`` of such so-called secondary moments and the ``criticism`` of the one-sidedness of modern aesthetics of nature through that review, all must also jump off from some kind of generous recognition of the ``aesthetic diversity of nature`` dynamically encountered in various ordinary circumstances.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Hegel, G. W. F., "헤겔 예술철학" 미술문화 2008

      2 임마누엘 칸트, "판단력비판" 아카넷 2009

      3 Tatarkiewicz, W., "여섯 가지 개념의 역사" 이론과실천 1990

      4 이마누엘 칸트, "아름다움과 숭고함의 감정에 관한 고찰" 책세상 2005

      5 Burk, E., "숭고와 아름다움의 이념의 기원에 대한 철학적 탐구" 마티 2006

      6 Beardsley, M. C., "미학사" 이론과실천 1987

      7 Hegel, G. W. F., "미학강의1: 미의 세계 속으로" 나남 1996

      8 Wolfzettel, F., "Ästhetische Grundbegriffe Band III" 760-779, 2010

      9 Baumgarten, A., "Ästheitk, übersetzt von Dagmar Mirbach" 2009

      10 Ritter, J., "Zur Funktion des Ästhetischen in der modernen Gesellschaft" 141-163, 1974

      1 Hegel, G. W. F., "헤겔 예술철학" 미술문화 2008

      2 임마누엘 칸트, "판단력비판" 아카넷 2009

      3 Tatarkiewicz, W., "여섯 가지 개념의 역사" 이론과실천 1990

      4 이마누엘 칸트, "아름다움과 숭고함의 감정에 관한 고찰" 책세상 2005

      5 Burk, E., "숭고와 아름다움의 이념의 기원에 대한 철학적 탐구" 마티 2006

      6 Beardsley, M. C., "미학사" 이론과실천 1987

      7 Hegel, G. W. F., "미학강의1: 미의 세계 속으로" 나남 1996

      8 Wolfzettel, F., "Ästhetische Grundbegriffe Band III" 760-779, 2010

      9 Baumgarten, A., "Ästheitk, übersetzt von Dagmar Mirbach" 2009

      10 Ritter, J., "Zur Funktion des Ästhetischen in der modernen Gesellschaft" 141-163, 1974

      11 Addison, J., "The Spectator" 411-421, 1712

      12 Santayana, G., "The Sense of Beauty(1896)" 1955

      13 Andrews, M., "The Search for the Picturesque: Landscape Aesthetics and Tourism in Britain, 1760-1800" Aldershot 1989

      14 Dickie, G., "The Philosophical Odyssey of Taste in the Eighteenth Century" 1996

      15 Hargrove, E. C., "The Historical Foundations of American Environmental Attitudes" 1 (1): 209-240, 1979

      16 Hipple, W., "The Beautiful, the Sublime, and the Picturesque in Eighteenth Century Aesthetic Theory"

      17 Berleant, A., "The Aesthetics of Environment" 1992

      18 Hussey, Ch, "Studies in a Point of View" 1967

      19 Böhme, G., "Soziale Naturwissenschaft: Wege zu einer Erweiterung der Ökologie" 1985

      20 Stolnitz, J., "On the Origins of ‘Aesthetic Disinterestedness’" 20 (20): 132-143, 1961

      21 Böhme, G., "Natürliche Natur" 1992

      22 Tuan, Y-F., "Landscape, Natural Beauty and the Arts" 139-157, 1993

      23 Simmel, G., "Jenseits der Schönheit: Schriften zur Ästhetik und Kunstphilosophie" 42-52, 2008

      24 Porteous, J. D., "Ideas, Politics and Planning" 1996

      25 Böhme, G., "Für eine Ökologische Naturästhetik" 1989

      26 Hepburn, R. W., "British Analytical Philosophy" 285-309, 1966

      27 Brady, E., "Aesthetics of Natural Environment" Tuscaloosa 2003

      28 Carlson, A., "Aesthetic Appreciation of the Natural Environment" 37 (37): 267-275, 1979

      29 Heyd, Th, "Aesthetic Appreciation and The Many Stories About Nature" 41 (41): 125-137, 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-10-05 학술지명변경 외국어명 : A semiannually Journal of Philosophical Thought in Korea -> EPOCH AND PHILOSOPHY -A Journal of Philosophical Thought in Korea- KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.61 0.61 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.66 0.62 1.3 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼