자동사냥 프로그램의 법적 문제 = The legal problem in an Auto-hunting bot - Mainly about the copyright infringement problem included in MDY Industries v. Blizzard Entertainment decision in US

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This Article focus on the abuse problem of auto bot which has been as an important problem as Real Money Trade of game items among many issues which the world's best online game industry of South Korea has suffered from. As a result, I would argue that Auto-hunting bot should be finally banned in our country regardless of the presence of any specific provision after each theory supporting the justification for using a bot is separately refuted.
Even though there are various legal methods to be taken for such prohibition following the above argument, this article mainly analyzed the copyright perspective included in MDY industries v. Blizzard Entertainment case of US District Court. As a result, except that whether a temporary storage would fall under the scope of the right of reproduction is different, it seems to be similarly difficult that the exhaustion principle of copyright might be implemented into the relation between online gaming service providers and their users, even if a similar dispute would occur in Korea in the future.
In addition, under this article's analysis, it is likely that the right of integrity which is unique in Korean Copyright Act would be infringed by using a bot.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 오토프로그램의 개요
• Ⅱ. 오토프로그램의 문제점과 그에 대한 법적 규제 방향
• Ⅲ. 저작권법적 규제를 다룬 MDY v. Blizzard 판결의 개요
• Ⅳ. 우리 저작권법에 의한 오토프로그램 규제시 각종 쟁점분석
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정상조, "지적재산권법" 법문사 2004

2 송영식, "지적소유권법(하)" 육법사 2008

3 김재형, "제3자에 의한 채권침해 -판례의 전개를 중심으로-. in: 민법학의 현대적 양상: 나암 서민교수 정년기념논문집" 법문사 2006

4 오승종, "저작권법" 박영사 2007

5 구병문, "자동사냥 프로그램에 관한 미국 와우(WOW) 게임 판결과 그 시사점" 한국저작권위원회 2009

6 이춘수, "인터넷상 재산권 — MMORPG상 가상재화인 아이템을 중심으로—" 서울대 기술과법센터 3 (3): 2007

7 서영민, "인터넷게임 아이템 거래에 관한 형사법적 문제" 서울대 기술과법센터 2006

8 윤해성, "인터넷 게임 아이템 거래에 관한 형사법적 검토" 법무부 (34) : 94-112, 2006

9 백강진, "온라인게임사업자의 책임" 정보법학회 6 (6): 2002

10 김혜경, "온라인게임 아이템의 재산범죄 성립가능성" 법학연구원 14 (14): 215-242, 2004

11 국회, "게임산업진흥에 관한 법률 전부개정법률안, 의안원문(2008. 11.) 및 동 검토보고서" 2009

12 최정환, "게임산업의 법적 문제점" 2006

13 박준석, "게임 아이템의 법적 문제" 서울대 기술과법센터 4 : 2009

14 中山信弘, "工業所有權法 上-特許法, 第2版" 弘文堂 1998

15 정해상, "假想社會와 財産權－ MMORPG를 中心으로 －" 중앙법학회 7 (7): 171-188, 2005

16 Lohmann, Fred von, "You Bought It, You Own It: MDY v. Blizzard Appealed"

17 Rotstein, Robert H., "The First Sale Doctrine In The Digital Age" 22 (22): 23-, 2010

18 박준석, "Quanta v. LG 판결이 한국에서 가진 의미에 대한 小考" 법학연구소 49 (49): 444-491, 2008

19 Patry, William F., "Patry on Copyright(Database updated March 2010) 중 § 17:43. Condition to the license or independent covenant?"

20 Chintapalli, Satish, "Mdy Industries v. Blizzard Entertainment: Preventing The Use Of Software Robots in An Online Game with Copyright Law" 46 : 2008

21 Peterson, Luke, "MDY v. Blizzard: Using the DMCA to Enforce the Rules of Fair Play in Online Gaming"

22 Redman, Jordan Christopher, "MDY INDUSTRIES, L.L.C. v. BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.: Software 'Contracts' That Expand Copyrights have gone too far" 3 : 2009

23 Nimmer, Raymond T., "Law of Computer Technology" 2009

24 Dratler, Jay, Jr., "Intellectual Property Law" 1 :

25 Nimmer, David, "Brains and Other Paraphernalia of the Digital Age"