RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    구강스캐너를 이용한 임플란트 보철물 제작 증례 = Implant prosthesis using intraoral scanner: Case Report

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101685337

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Accuracy is the most important thing in implant prosthesis, for this reason it is essential procedure to check the accuracy of impression taking. However, impression material has its own error and the error occurs in model-making procedure. As an alternative way to this, using intraoral scanner can be suggested and many studies were issued reporting that there's no statistically significant difference in accuracy between intraoral scanner and conventional impression. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to report the process of making of implant prosthesis using intraoral scanner, which is more convenient, fast, accurate compared with conventional method.
    번역하기

    Accuracy is the most important thing in implant prosthesis, for this reason it is essential procedure to check the accuracy of impression taking. However, impression material has its own error and the error occurs in model-making procedure. As an alte...

    Accuracy is the most important thing in implant prosthesis, for this reason it is essential procedure to check the accuracy of impression taking. However, impression material has its own error and the error occurs in model-making procedure. As an alternative way to this, using intraoral scanner can be suggested and many studies were issued reporting that there's no statistically significant difference in accuracy between intraoral scanner and conventional impression. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to report the process of making of implant prosthesis using intraoral scanner, which is more convenient, fast, accurate compared with conventional method.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Papaspyridakos P, "Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes" 2015

    2 Wee AG, "Comparison of impression materials for direct multiimplant impressions" 83 : 323-331, 2000

    3 Cho SH, "Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods" 113 : 310-315, 2015

    4 Del'Acqua MA, "Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis" 25 : 715-721, 2010

    5 Del'Acqua MA, "Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis" 23 : 226-236, 2008

    6 Güth JF, "Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing" 17 : 1201-1208, 2013

    7 김재홍, "Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique" 대한치과교정학회 44 (44): 69-76, 2014

    1 Papaspyridakos P, "Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes" 2015

    2 Wee AG, "Comparison of impression materials for direct multiimplant impressions" 83 : 323-331, 2000

    3 Cho SH, "Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods" 113 : 310-315, 2015

    4 Del'Acqua MA, "Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis" 25 : 715-721, 2010

    5 Del'Acqua MA, "Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis" 23 : 226-236, 2008

    6 Güth JF, "Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing" 17 : 1201-1208, 2013

    7 김재홍, "Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique" 대한치과교정학회 44 (44): 69-76, 2014

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.22 0.22 0.2
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.21 0.21 0.353 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼