RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    QFD 및 PROMETHEE 혼합 그룹의사결정 방식의 적용 = Applying a Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach using QFD and PROMETHEE

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99800669

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Quality Function Deployment(QFD) is an useful tool so as to meet both customer and engineering requirements and also to ensure quality throughout each stage of the product development and production process. Traditionally, QFD rates engineering characteristics(ECs) with respect to customer attributes(CA) and aggregates the ratings to get relative importance score of ECs. Some studies indicated the need to consider additional factors, such as cost and environmental impact other than acquiring the relative importance of ECs. The conventional QFD structure requires individuals to express their preferences in a restricted scale without exceptions. In practice, people contributing to the process tend generally to give information about their personal preferences in many different ways, numerically or linguistically, depending on their background. However, collaborative decision making is not an emphasized issue in QFD even though it requires several people`s involvement. Successful applications of QFD, thus, rely on effective communication among team members to reach a consensus. In this study, a hybrid approach which employs QFD and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations(PROMETHEE) together, is applied for a group decision making. An application on public service area(Jikji related policy and projects) is supplied to illustrate the approach.
    번역하기

    Quality Function Deployment(QFD) is an useful tool so as to meet both customer and engineering requirements and also to ensure quality throughout each stage of the product development and production process. Traditionally, QFD rates engineering charac...

    Quality Function Deployment(QFD) is an useful tool so as to meet both customer and engineering requirements and also to ensure quality throughout each stage of the product development and production process. Traditionally, QFD rates engineering characteristics(ECs) with respect to customer attributes(CA) and aggregates the ratings to get relative importance score of ECs. Some studies indicated the need to consider additional factors, such as cost and environmental impact other than acquiring the relative importance of ECs. The conventional QFD structure requires individuals to express their preferences in a restricted scale without exceptions. In practice, people contributing to the process tend generally to give information about their personal preferences in many different ways, numerically or linguistically, depending on their background. However, collaborative decision making is not an emphasized issue in QFD even though it requires several people`s involvement. Successful applications of QFD, thus, rely on effective communication among team members to reach a consensus. In this study, a hybrid approach which employs QFD and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations(PROMETHEE) together, is applied for a group decision making. An application on public service area(Jikji related policy and projects) is supplied to illustrate the approach.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 명현건, "품질기능전개와 순위 가중치를 이용한 다속성 의사결정" 한국경영공학회 14 (14): 193-206, 2009

    2 박희석, "품질기능전개를 이용한 플라이어의 인간공학적 디자인" 대한인간공학회 26 (26): 85-90, 2007

    3 이영재, "지능의사결정지원시스템" 생능출판사 2009

    4 임치환, "요구사항 관점에서 의사결정을 위한 QFD와 PROMETHEE의 통합 접근방법" 한국경영공학회 17 (17): 95-109, 2012

    5 임치환, "다수 평가자들의 이질성을 고려한 품질기능전개 응용 사례 연구" 한국경영공학회 16 (16): 221-235, 2011

    6 박흥국, "그룹지원시스템, 의사결정지원 시스템" 경문사 2004

    7 박기남, "교육품질 향상을 위한 e-비즈니스 커리큘럼 개발에 QFD와 컨조인트 분석의 실증적 적용에 관한 연구" 678-685, 2002

    8 Hauser, G. R., "The House of Quality" 63-73, 1988

    9 Macharts, C., "The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure" 7 : 283-307, 1998

    10 Haralambopoulos, D. A., "Renewable energy projects : structuring a multicriteria group decision-making framework" 28 : 961-973, 2003

    1 명현건, "품질기능전개와 순위 가중치를 이용한 다속성 의사결정" 한국경영공학회 14 (14): 193-206, 2009

    2 박희석, "품질기능전개를 이용한 플라이어의 인간공학적 디자인" 대한인간공학회 26 (26): 85-90, 2007

    3 이영재, "지능의사결정지원시스템" 생능출판사 2009

    4 임치환, "요구사항 관점에서 의사결정을 위한 QFD와 PROMETHEE의 통합 접근방법" 한국경영공학회 17 (17): 95-109, 2012

    5 임치환, "다수 평가자들의 이질성을 고려한 품질기능전개 응용 사례 연구" 한국경영공학회 16 (16): 221-235, 2011

    6 박흥국, "그룹지원시스템, 의사결정지원 시스템" 경문사 2004

    7 박기남, "교육품질 향상을 위한 e-비즈니스 커리큘럼 개발에 QFD와 컨조인트 분석의 실증적 적용에 관한 연구" 678-685, 2002

    8 Hauser, G. R., "The House of Quality" 63-73, 1988

    9 Macharts, C., "The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure" 7 : 283-307, 1998

    10 Haralambopoulos, D. A., "Renewable energy projects : structuring a multicriteria group decision-making framework" 28 : 961-973, 2003

    11 Liu, S. T., "Rating design requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach" 43 (43): 497-513, 2005

    12 정상철, "QFD를 이용한 인터넷 쇼핑몰의 서비스 품질 측정 및 개선에 관한 연구" 한국데이타베이스학회 11 (11): 181-208, 2004

    13 서원석, "QFD(Quality Function Deployment)를 이용한 호텔서비스품질 측정에 관한 연구: 호텔 서비스과정의 중요도를 중심으로" 한국관광학회 29 (29): 335-356, 2005

    14 Sullivan, L. P., "QFD" 19 (19): 39-50, 1986

    15 홍성준, "PRPMETHEE와 ANP 기법을 활용한 상수도관망의 위험요소 평가" 19 (19): 106-116, 2006

    16 민재형, "PRPMETHEE를 이용한 다기준의사결정" 14 (14): 1-19, 2004

    17 Brans, J. P., "PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis" 477-490, 1984

    18 Behzadian, M., "PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications" 200 : 198-215, 2010

    19 Brans, J. P., "PROMETHEE metheds, In Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys" Springer 2005

    20 Behzadian, M., "PROMETHEE group decision support system and the house of quality, Group Decision and Negotiation" Springer 2011

    21 Raju, K. S., "Multicriterion analysis for sustainable water resources planning : a case study in Spain" 14 : 435-456, 2000

    22 Bhattacharya, A., "Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective" 43 (43): 3671-3685, 2005

    23 Bai, H., "Inexact genetic algorithm approach to target values setting of engineering requirements in QFD" 41 (41): 3861-3881, 2003

    24 Ignatius, J., "Hybrid models in decision making under uncertainty : the case of training provider evaluation" 21 : 147-162, 2010

    25 Brans, J. P., "How to select and how to rank projects : The PROMETHEE method" 24 (24): 228-238, 1986

    26 PROMETHEE-GAIA.COM, "How to choose the right preference function?"

    27 Temponi, C., "House of quality : a fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis" 117 : 340-354, 1999

    28 Buyukozkan, G., "Group decision-making to better respond to customer needs in customer needs in software development" 48 (48): 427-441, 2005

    29 Morais, D. C., "Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water network" 52 (52): 441-459, 2007

    30 Mareschal, B., "Geometrical representations for MCDA: the GAIA module" 34 (34): 69-77, 1988

    31 Kim, K. J., "Fuzzy multictriteria models for quality function deployment" 121 (121): 504-518, 2000

    32 Buyukozkan, G., "Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in quality function deployment" 58 (58): 392-402, 2007

    33 Zakarian, A., "Forming teams : an analytical approach" 31 : 85-97, 1999

    34 Hsiao, S. W., "Concurrent design method for developing a new product" 29 : 41-55, 2002

    35 Perez, J., "Comments on Saaty’s AHP" 41 (41): 1091-1095, 1995

    36 Chuang, P. T., "Combining the AHP and QFD for a location from a requirement perspective" 18 : 842-849, 2001

    37 Karimi, B. H., "Applying a hybrid QFD-TOPSIS method to design product in the industry" 4 (4): 3283-3288, 2012

    38 Dweiri, F. T., "An integration of the analytic hierarchy process into the quality function deployment process, International Journal of Industrial Engineering : Theory" 12 (12): 180-188, 2005

    39 Ho, ESSA, "An integrated group decision- making approach to quality function deployment" 31 (31): 553-567, 1999

    40 Akao, Y., "An Introduction to Quality Function Deployment, In Quality Function Deployment; Integration Customer Requirements into Product Design" Productivity Press 1-24, 1990

    41 Armacost, R. L., "An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD : an industrialized housing application" 26 (26): 72-79, 1994

    42 Carlsson, C., "AHP in political group decision : a study in the art of possibilities" 25 (25): 14-29, 1995

    43 Chan, L. K., "A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example" 33 : 119-139, 2005

    44 Iz, P. H., "A survey of integrated group decision support systems involving multiple criteria, in Multiple Criteria decision Making" Springer Veriag 75-85, 1992

    45 Brans, J. P., "A preference ranking organization method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM" 31 (31): 647-656, 1985

    46 Kahraman, C, "A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach" 171 : 390-411, 2006

    47 Fung, R. Y. K., "A fuzzy expected value –based goal programming model for product planning using quality function deployment" 37 (37): 633-647, 2005

    48 청주시, "2010년도 주요업무 시행계획 (직속 기관 및 사업소)" 청주시 159-208, 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-08-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국보전경영학회지 -> 한국경영공학회지 KCI등재
    2006-07-21 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국보전경영학회 -> 한국경영공학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Management Engineers Society
    KCI등재
    2005-03-22 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국보전경영학회지
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.62 0.62 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.57 0.48 0.749 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼