RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지방분권추진과 지방정부개혁의 연계방안에 관한 연구 = The Linkage Strategy between Decentralization and Local Government Reform

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103986973

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    South Korea over the recent decade has been driving public sector reform, or innovation. Many government reform programs underway were introduced by policy makers or political leadership. The reform's goals and approaches sought by each government have some different points. However, the results in evaluating their reform performance are nearer to failure rather than success. Also, the Participatory Government started in the beginning of 2003 can not overlook the historic stream of public reform. President Roh has to restructure a functional relationship between central and local government before driving public sector reform.
    The biggest beneficiary of the decentralization policy is local government throughout the country. An enlargement of autonomous power gained throughout decentralization is welcomed by local government, but it is accompanied with responsibility. Therefore, the decentralization drive has a function not only as an engine promoting local government reform (LGR), but also as a challenger to its reformation and innovation.
    In my ongoing study, I investigate the linkage strategies between decentralization and local government reform. The intended purpose of this paper is not only to highlight the devolution of functional responsibilities to local government, but also to explore alternatives to be able to internalize the reformation engine. This paper suggested the 'Regional Innovation Association(RIA)' as a linkage mechanism for bridging between decentralization policy and local government reform.
    Finally, decentralization dashing under central government's initiatives should develop as an infrastructure doing regional development and upgrading the quality of citizen life.
    번역하기

    South Korea over the recent decade has been driving public sector reform, or innovation. Many government reform programs underway were introduced by policy makers or political leadership. The reform's goals and approaches sought by each government hav...

    South Korea over the recent decade has been driving public sector reform, or innovation. Many government reform programs underway were introduced by policy makers or political leadership. The reform's goals and approaches sought by each government have some different points. However, the results in evaluating their reform performance are nearer to failure rather than success. Also, the Participatory Government started in the beginning of 2003 can not overlook the historic stream of public reform. President Roh has to restructure a functional relationship between central and local government before driving public sector reform.
    The biggest beneficiary of the decentralization policy is local government throughout the country. An enlargement of autonomous power gained throughout decentralization is welcomed by local government, but it is accompanied with responsibility. Therefore, the decentralization drive has a function not only as an engine promoting local government reform (LGR), but also as a challenger to its reformation and innovation.
    In my ongoing study, I investigate the linkage strategies between decentralization and local government reform. The intended purpose of this paper is not only to highlight the devolution of functional responsibilities to local government, but also to explore alternatives to be able to internalize the reformation engine. This paper suggested the 'Regional Innovation Association(RIA)' as a linkage mechanism for bridging between decentralization policy and local government reform.
    Finally, decentralization dashing under central government's initiatives should develop as an infrastructure doing regional development and upgrading the quality of citizen life.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "참여정부 지방분권 추진 로드맵." 정부혁신지방분권위원회 2003

    2 윤영진, "지방정부개혁" 대영문화사 2001

    3 최길수, "지방정부 행정개혁의 목적과 수단에 관한 연구: AHP의 상대적 중요도를 중심으로" 한국행정연구원 12 (12): 178-207, 2003

    4 "지방자치행정분야 지방분권주요과제" 전국시도지사협의회 지방분권특별위원회 2003

    5 김대영, "지방자치단체회계제도의 개혁과 과제" 3 : 17-31, 2001

    6 염명배, "지방분권화 시대의 지방재정 자율성 및 책임성에 관한 논의" 8 (8): 33-66, 2003

    7 성경룡, "지방분권형 국가만들기" 나남출판사 2003

    8 윤순갑, "지방분권과 지역혁신" 대구경북포럼 (40) : 26-30, 2003

    9 김순은, "지방분권 정책의 집행에 영향을 미친 요인 분석 일본의 사례를 중심으로" 7 (7): 7-30, 2003

    10 김태영, "우리나라 지방정부개혁의 논리와 실제" 15 : 87-108, 2001

    1 "참여정부 지방분권 추진 로드맵." 정부혁신지방분권위원회 2003

    2 윤영진, "지방정부개혁" 대영문화사 2001

    3 최길수, "지방정부 행정개혁의 목적과 수단에 관한 연구: AHP의 상대적 중요도를 중심으로" 한국행정연구원 12 (12): 178-207, 2003

    4 "지방자치행정분야 지방분권주요과제" 전국시도지사협의회 지방분권특별위원회 2003

    5 김대영, "지방자치단체회계제도의 개혁과 과제" 3 : 17-31, 2001

    6 염명배, "지방분권화 시대의 지방재정 자율성 및 책임성에 관한 논의" 8 (8): 33-66, 2003

    7 성경룡, "지방분권형 국가만들기" 나남출판사 2003

    8 윤순갑, "지방분권과 지역혁신" 대구경북포럼 (40) : 26-30, 2003

    9 김순은, "지방분권 정책의 집행에 영향을 미친 요인 분석 일본의 사례를 중심으로" 7 (7): 7-30, 2003

    10 김태영, "우리나라 지방정부개혁의 논리와 실제" 15 : 87-108, 2001

    11 하혜수, "신공공관리론적 지방행정개혁의 성과평가" 16 (16): 27-47, 2004

    12 박순애, "서울시 행정개혁의 현황과 향후 과제" 2 (2): 103-116, 2001

    13 변용환, "국가균형특별법에 부응한 지방발전과제" 강원광장 56 : 13-27, 2004

    14 장재홍, "국가균형발전을 위한 지역혁신체계 구축 방안" 21-33, 2003.10월

    15 최유성, "‘국민의 정부’의 지방행정개혁에 대한 평가와 향후 개혁과제" 11 (11): 75-106, 2002

    16 Newman, J., "Transforming Local Government: Innovation and Modernization," Public Money & Management 61-68, 2001,April-June

    17 Christensen, J.G, "The Dynamics of Decentralization and Recentralization" 64 (64): 81-91, 2000

    18 Lundahl.L, "Sweden: decentralization, deregulation, quasi-markets and then what," 17 (17): 687-697, 2002

    19 Haruna, P. F, "Reforming Ghana's Public Service: Issues and Experiences in Comparative Perspective" 63 (63): 343-353, 2003

    20 Bhatta, G, "Post-NPM Themes In Public Sector Governance" (17) : 2003

    21 Korthals Altes,, "Local Government and the Decentralization of Urban Regeneration Policies in The Netherland" 39 (39): 1439-1452, 2002

    22 Sato, M, "Intergovernmental Transfers, Governance Structure and Fiscal Decentralization," 53 (53): 55-76, 2002

    23 Schneider, A, "Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement," 38 (38): 32-56, 2003

    24 Schneider, A, "Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement" 38 (38): 32-56, 2003

    25 Moreno,L, "Decentralization in Spain" Regional Studies 36 (36): 399-408, 2002

    26 Gomez,E.J, "Decentralization and Municipal Governance: Suggested Approaches for Cross-Regional Analysis," 38 (38): 57-80, 2003

    27 Ryan, J.J, "Decentralization and Democratic Instability: The Case of Costa Rica" 64 (64): 81-91, 2004

    28 Hutchcroft, P.D, "Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power" 14 (14): 23-53, 2001

    29 Alm,, "Can Indonesia Decentralise Successfully? Plans, Problems and Prospects" 37 (37): 83-102, 2001

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.89 0.89 0.84
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.87 1.024 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼