RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Right Dislocation vs. Fragment: A Reply to Ko (2014)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103683230

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Ahn & Cho (2005) proposes that some fragmentary utterances in Korean are derived from the full sentential structure via movement and deletion. Right dislocation (RD) in Korean can be analyzed in a similar way to fragments. D. Chung (2009), Kim & Hong (2013), and Ahn & Cho (2014) suggest that RD in Korean has bi-clausal structure (host clause plus appendix clause) and that an RDed phrase undergoes movement to a clause initial position in appendix clause and the rest of the clause undergoes deletion. This type of analysis accounts for the fact that RDed elements and fragments share core properties (cf. D. Chung 2009, 2012a, Kim & Hong 2013). Ko (2014), however, examines the question of whether the RDed elements can be treated in the same way as sentence fragments and argues that RDed elements significantly differ from fragments. This paper aims to defend the parallelism between RDed elements and fragments by reconsidering the data Ko (2014) discusses.
      번역하기

      Ahn & Cho (2005) proposes that some fragmentary utterances in Korean are derived from the full sentential structure via movement and deletion. Right dislocation (RD) in Korean can be analyzed in a similar way to fragments. D. Chung (2009), Kim & Hong ...

      Ahn & Cho (2005) proposes that some fragmentary utterances in Korean are derived from the full sentential structure via movement and deletion. Right dislocation (RD) in Korean can be analyzed in a similar way to fragments. D. Chung (2009), Kim & Hong (2013), and Ahn & Cho (2014) suggest that RD in Korean has bi-clausal structure (host clause plus appendix clause) and that an RDed phrase undergoes movement to a clause initial position in appendix clause and the rest of the clause undergoes deletion. This type of analysis accounts for the fact that RDed elements and fragments share core properties (cf. D. Chung 2009, 2012a, Kim & Hong 2013). Ko (2014), however, examines the question of whether the RDed elements can be treated in the same way as sentence fragments and argues that RDed elements significantly differ from fragments. This paper aims to defend the parallelism between RDed elements and fragments by reconsidering the data Ko (2014) discusses.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 고희정, "Two Ways to the Right: A Hybrid approach to Right-dislocation in Korean" 언어교육원 51 (51): 3-40, 2015

      2 Merchant, J., "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" Oxford University Press 2001

      3 Watanabe, A, "The genesis of negative concord: Syntax and morphology of negative doubling" 37 : 551-579, 2004

      4 Chung, D., "Some notes on Ko's (2014, 2015) hybrid analysis of the Korean RDC" Hankuk University of Foreign Studies 2015

      5 Chung, S., "Sluicing(:) between structure and inference,' in Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo, Line Mikkelsen and Eric Potsdam (2011) Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Judith Aissen" California Digital Library eScholarship Repository. Linguistic Research Center, University of California 31-50, 2011

      6 Chung, S., "Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return" Department of Linguistics 73-91, 2005

      7 Chung, S., "Sluicing and logical form" 3 : 239-282, 1995

      8 Ahn, H.-D., "Selected Papers from the 2006 Cyprus Syntaxfest" Cambridge Scholars Publishing 29-62, 2009

      9 Ahn, H.-D., "Right dislocation in Korean" 2014

      10 Ott, D., "Right dislocation as deletion" University of Groningen 2013

      1 고희정, "Two Ways to the Right: A Hybrid approach to Right-dislocation in Korean" 언어교육원 51 (51): 3-40, 2015

      2 Merchant, J., "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" Oxford University Press 2001

      3 Watanabe, A, "The genesis of negative concord: Syntax and morphology of negative doubling" 37 : 551-579, 2004

      4 Chung, D., "Some notes on Ko's (2014, 2015) hybrid analysis of the Korean RDC" Hankuk University of Foreign Studies 2015

      5 Chung, S., "Sluicing(:) between structure and inference,' in Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo, Line Mikkelsen and Eric Potsdam (2011) Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Judith Aissen" California Digital Library eScholarship Repository. Linguistic Research Center, University of California 31-50, 2011

      6 Chung, S., "Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return" Department of Linguistics 73-91, 2005

      7 Chung, S., "Sluicing and logical form" 3 : 239-282, 1995

      8 Ahn, H.-D., "Selected Papers from the 2006 Cyprus Syntaxfest" Cambridge Scholars Publishing 29-62, 2009

      9 Ahn, H.-D., "Right dislocation in Korean" 2014

      10 Ott, D., "Right dislocation as deletion" University of Groningen 2013

      11 고희정, "Remarks on Right Dislocation Construction in Korean: Challenges to bi-clausal analyses" 언어교육원 50 (50): 275-310, 2014

      12 Ahn, H.-D., "Reconstruction asymmetries in ellipsis: Implication for scrambling" 3-4, 2010

      13 정대호, "Pre- vs. Post-verbal Asymmetries and the Syntax of Korean Right Dislocated Construction" 한국생성문법학회 22 (22): 703-721, 2012

      14 정대호, "On the nature of null WH-phrases in Korean" 언어정보연구소 30 (30): 473-487, 2013

      15 Ahn, H.-D., "On some ellipsis phenomena in Korean" Hankuk Publishing Co 3-33, 2012

      16 안희돈, "On Scope Asymmetries in Fragments" 한국생성문법학회 15 (15): 661-678, 2005

      17 안희돈, "On Caseless Fragments in Korean" 현대문법학회 70 (70): 25-47, 2012

      18 안희돈, "Notes on Two Types of Fragments" 언어정보연구소 28 (28): 19-35, 2011

      19 Park, B-S., "Island-insensitivity fragment answers in Korean" 2005

      20 정대호, "Is amwu( N)-to a negative quantifier?" 언어정보연구소 29 (29): 541-562, 2012

      21 Kim, S-W., "Hanging topic, pseudo-right dislocation and (pseudo) fragment answers" Dongguk University 2013

      22 Ross, J, "Guess who?" 5 : 252-286, 1969

      23 안희돈, "Fragments, Clause Type, and Clausal Architecture" 한국생성문법학회 21 (21): 201-214, 2011

      24 Merchant, J, "Fragments and ellipsis" 27 : 661-738, 2004

      25 Romero, M., "Focus and reconstruction effects in wh-phrases" University of Massachusetts at Amherst 1998

      26 Ahn, H. -D., "Cokakmwun Yenkwu [Studies on Fragments]" Hankuk Mwunhwasa 2012

      27 정대호, "An Elliptical Coordination Analysis of the Right Dislocated Construction in Korean" 대한언어학회 17 (17): 1-23, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Generative Grammar KCI등재
      2005-02-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Generative Grammar KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.6 0.6 0.56
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.55 0.48 1.439 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼