쌍대비교에 기반한 승법적 효용함수의 결정 = Determination of Multiplicative Utility Function Based on the Pair-wise Comparisons

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The ever increasing demand for enhanced competitiveness of engineered products requires “designing-in- quality” strategies that can effectively and efficiently incorporate concepts of uncertainty and quality into design. Multi-attribute utility function is commonly used to represent the decision-maker’s preference on multiple design attributes under conditions of uncertainty and risk. One of the major issues in implementing this approach concerns the generation of appropriate utility function, especially in a complex engineering design environment. Typically, the decision maker’s preference is revealed through lottery questions rather than being structured on the deductive reasoning to reflect the nonlinear tradeoffs among the attributes. The use of such intuitive procedures can lead to inexact preference information that may result in inaccuracy and rank reversal problems. This paper presents an alternative procedure based on the pair-wise comparisons between design alternatives towards a consistent preference presentation in assessing multiplicative utility function. The effectiveness of the overall procedures is tested with the aid of an injection-molding process design for a capacitor can and the results are discussed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "의사결정분석 및 응용" 영지문화사. 1999

2 "쌍대비교에 기초한 다속성 효용함수의 결정 및 사출성형문제에 대한 응용" 12 : 465-472, 2003

3 "강건설계를 이용한 품질공학" 민영사. 2001

4 "]Moldflow manual" 1996

5 "ZAPROS- method and system for rank-ordering of multiattribute alternative" 82 : 503-521, 1995

6 "Utility Models for Multiple Objective Decisions：Do They Accurately Represent Human Preferences?" 10 : 451-479, 1979

7 "Two Approaches for Improving the Dual Response Method in Robust Parameter Design" 36 : 154-168, 2004

8 "Trade-offs in Robust Engineering Design" sacramento : 1-8, 1997

9 "The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior" princeton university press : 1947

10 "The Desirability Function" 21 : 494-498, 1965

11 "Systems Engineering：A New Framework for Engineering Design" 60 : 39-46, 1996

12 "Strategies for Robust Multi-Response Quality Engineering" 25 : 5-15, 1993

13 "Statistics as a Catalyst to Learning by Scientific Method. Part II-A Discussion" 31 : 16-20, 1999

14 "Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables" 12 : 214-219, 1980

15 "Simultaneous Optimization of Multiple Responses Represented by Polynomial Regression Functions" 23 : 363-375, 1981

16 "Response Surface Alternative to the Taguchi Robust Parameter Design Approach" 46 : 131-139, 1992

17 "Quality Loss Functions for Optimization cross Multiple Response Surfaces" 29 : 339-346, 1997

18 "Preference Modeling by Estimating Local Utility Functions for Multiobjective Optimization" 115-138, 1996

19 "Multiresponse Optimization of Acid Casein Production" 12 : 247-258, 1990

20 "Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Inexact Value-Function Assessment" 21 : 318-336, 1990

21 "Modified Desirability Functions for Multiple Response Optimization" 28 : 337-345, 1996

22 "IEEE Transactions on Systems" 21 : 1498-1511, 1991

23 "Fitting Yield and Cost Response Surfaces" 56 : 62-68, 1960

24 "Direct Search-Based Automatic Minimization of Warpage And Weldlines in Injection Molded Parts" u. of massachusetts : 40-88, 1998

25 "Decisions with Multiple Objectives：Preferences and Value Tradeoffs" ny : 282-343, 1993

26 "Consistency and Accuracy in Decision Aids：Experiments with Four Multiattribute Systems" 26 (26): 723-748, 1995

27 "Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies：A Dual Response Approach" 22 : 38-45, 1990

28 "Analytic Parameter Design" 8 : 75-91, 1995

29 "An Integrated Method of Parameter Design and Tolerance Design" 11 : 417-425, 1999

30 "A Nonlinear Programming Solution to the Dual Response Problem" 25 : 199-204, 1993

31 "A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Multiple-Response Optimization" 36 : 432-450, 2004

32 "A General Framework Based on Combined Array" 36 : 27-37, 2004

33 "A Formal Method for Subjective Design Evaluation with Multiple Attributes" 3 : 105-122, 1991

34 "A Compromise Approach To Multiple Optimization" 30 : 309-313, 1998