RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      개방형 혁신이 산업에 미치는 효과: 슘페터 경쟁 하의 전략적 제휴를 중심으로 = The Effect of Open Innovation on Industry: Strategic Alliances under Schumpeterian Competition

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82565781

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      With the increasing importance of ecosystem in a business environment, the value of open innovation is receiving great attention. Under open innovation, companies open their knowledge, capital, and other resources to cooperating companies; on the other hand, under closed innovation companies depend solely on their own resources. In this paper, we compare closed and open innovation using the simulation method, and confirm that in terms of total capital and production of the industry, open innovation provides greater opportunities to the entire ecosystem. Moreover, Schumpeterian competition, which is a dynamic of closed innovation, functions even under open innovation. Our findings highlight that not only small but also large companies can receive the benefit of an enlarged industry under open innovation
      번역하기

      With the increasing importance of ecosystem in a business environment, the value of open innovation is receiving great attention. Under open innovation, companies open their knowledge, capital, and other resources to cooperating companies; on the othe...

      With the increasing importance of ecosystem in a business environment, the value of open innovation is receiving great attention. Under open innovation, companies open their knowledge, capital, and other resources to cooperating companies; on the other hand, under closed innovation companies depend solely on their own resources. In this paper, we compare closed and open innovation using the simulation method, and confirm that in terms of total capital and production of the industry, open innovation provides greater opportunities to the entire ecosystem. Moreover, Schumpeterian competition, which is a dynamic of closed innovation, functions even under open innovation. Our findings highlight that not only small but also large companies can receive the benefit of an enlarged industry under open innovation

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Muller, P., "Why do Firms Disclose Knowledge and How does it Matter?" 16 : 85-108, 2005

      2 Alchian, A. A., "Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory" 58 (58): 211-221, 1950

      3 Simon, H. A., "Theories of Decision Making in Economics" 49 : 253-283, 1959

      4 Schumpeter, J. A., "The Theory of Economic Development" Harvard University Press 1934

      5 Hirschman, A. O., "The Paternity of an Index" 5 (5): 1964

      6 Chesbrough, H. W., "The Era of Open Innovation" 44 (44): 2003

      7 Garman, A., "Sustaining Venture Creation from Industrial Labs" 46 (46): 16-19, 2003

      8 Katila, R., "Something Old, Something New: a Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction" 45 (45): 1183-1194, 2002

      9 Henderson, R., "Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery" 27 (27): 32-59, 1996

      10 Winter, S. G., "Satisficing, Selection, and The Innovating Remnant" 85 (85): 237-261, 1971

      1 Muller, P., "Why do Firms Disclose Knowledge and How does it Matter?" 16 : 85-108, 2005

      2 Alchian, A. A., "Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory" 58 (58): 211-221, 1950

      3 Simon, H. A., "Theories of Decision Making in Economics" 49 : 253-283, 1959

      4 Schumpeter, J. A., "The Theory of Economic Development" Harvard University Press 1934

      5 Hirschman, A. O., "The Paternity of an Index" 5 (5): 1964

      6 Chesbrough, H. W., "The Era of Open Innovation" 44 (44): 2003

      7 Garman, A., "Sustaining Venture Creation from Industrial Labs" 46 (46): 16-19, 2003

      8 Katila, R., "Something Old, Something New: a Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction" 45 (45): 1183-1194, 2002

      9 Henderson, R., "Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery" 27 (27): 32-59, 1996

      10 Winter, S. G., "Satisficing, Selection, and The Innovating Remnant" 85 (85): 237-261, 1971

      11 Tirpak, T. M., "R&D Structure in a Changing World" 49 (49): 19-26, 2006

      12 Laursen, K., "Open for Innovation: The Role of Opennesss in Explaining Innovation Performance Among U.K. Manufacturing Firms" 27 : 131-150, 2006

      13 Chesbrough, H. W., "Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating And Profiting from Technology" Harvard Business School Press 2003

      14 Chesbrough, H. W., "Open Innovation: How Companies Actually Do It" 81 (81): 14-, 2003

      15 Katila, R., "New Product Search over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime?" 45 (45): 995-1010, 2002

      16 Garman, A., "Microsoft To Sell Non-Core Tech" 3 : 4-5, 2006

      17 Lee, J., "Innovation and Strategic Divergence: An Empirical Study of the U. S. Pharmaceutical Industry from 1920 to 1960" 49 (49): 143-159, 2003

      18 Nelson, R. R., "Forces Generating and Limiting Concentration under Schumpeterian Competition" 9 (9): 524-548, 1978

      19 Mansfield, E., "Entry, Gibrat's Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms" 52 (52): 1023-1051, 1962

      20 Chan, S. H., "Do Strategic Alliances Create Value?" 46 : 199-221, 1997

      21 Sakkab, N., "Conncect and Develop Complements Research and Develop at P&G" 45 (45): 38-45, 2002

      22 Watts, D. J., "Collective Dynamics of 'Small-world' Networks" 393 (393): 440-442, 1998

      23 Chesbrough, H. W., "Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries" 36 (36): 2006

      24 Nelson, R. R., "An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change" Harvard University Press 1982

      25 Koput, K. W., "A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions" 8 (8): 528-542, 1997

      26 Cyert, R. M., "A Behavioral Theory of the Firm" Prentice Hall 1963

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-10-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Knowledge Management Society of Korea -> Knowledge Management Review KCI등재
      2014-10-10 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Knowledge Management Society of Korea KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-03-21 학술지등록 한글명 : 지식경영연구
      외국어명 : The Knowledge Management Society of Korea
      KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.47 1.47 1.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.4 1.28 2.047 0.3
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼