RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조선 왕실의 아기태실비에 대한 양식과 편년 재검토 = Review on Style and Chronology of Baby Taesil Monuments in the royal family of the Joseon Dynasty

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100110487

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    I presented in 2006 the study on the style and chronology of Baby Taesil Monuments [First monuments erected in Taesils]found in Taesil[a facility of burying Placenta and umbilical cord] created by the royal family of the Joseon Dynasty. However, it did not accurately discuss the chronology of Bisu[top of monument] and Bidae[pedestal of monument] of the monuments and the previous style and chronology had to be revised as additional monuments have been found. This study revises and supplements the previous study and attempts to address the individual style and chronology of Bisu and Bidae to reconfigure the style and chronology of baby monuments. Also, the monuments` composition was analyzed to observe the transition in the epigraph to supplement the style and chronology of baby monuments. As a result, the composition of baby monuments was largely classified into 5 steps(12 steps in detail). The style and chronology of Bisu were classified into 5 steps(10 steps in detail) while those of Bidae were classified into 3 steps(6 steps in detail) and the overall style of baby monuments was classified into 5 steps(10 steps in detail). The composition of epitaph, which was newly discussed this time, provides additional information on the time of creation of the monument, or Taesil, based on the form of composition even if it is not legible due to wearing. The individual style and chronology of Bisu and Bidae would provide significant evidence on the time of creation even if only a part of the monument remains due to damage. (Curator, Uljin Bongpyeong Sillabi Museum / baekseok@korea.kr)
    번역하기

    I presented in 2006 the study on the style and chronology of Baby Taesil Monuments [First monuments erected in Taesils]found in Taesil[a facility of burying Placenta and umbilical cord] created by the royal family of the Joseon Dynasty. Howeve...

    I presented in 2006 the study on the style and chronology of Baby Taesil Monuments [First monuments erected in Taesils]found in Taesil[a facility of burying Placenta and umbilical cord] created by the royal family of the Joseon Dynasty. However, it did not accurately discuss the chronology of Bisu[top of monument] and Bidae[pedestal of monument] of the monuments and the previous style and chronology had to be revised as additional monuments have been found. This study revises and supplements the previous study and attempts to address the individual style and chronology of Bisu and Bidae to reconfigure the style and chronology of baby monuments. Also, the monuments` composition was analyzed to observe the transition in the epigraph to supplement the style and chronology of baby monuments. As a result, the composition of baby monuments was largely classified into 5 steps(12 steps in detail). The style and chronology of Bisu were classified into 5 steps(10 steps in detail) while those of Bidae were classified into 3 steps(6 steps in detail) and the overall style of baby monuments was classified into 5 steps(10 steps in detail). The composition of epitaph, which was newly discussed this time, provides additional information on the time of creation of the monument, or Taesil, based on the form of composition even if it is not legible due to wearing. The individual style and chronology of Bisu and Bidae would provide significant evidence on the time of creation even if only a part of the monument remains due to damage. (Curator, Uljin Bongpyeong Sillabi Museum / baekseok@korea.kr)

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 지성룡, "화길옹주 태실" 단양문화원 : 76 ~, 2012

    2 이호관, "한국의 미 -석등․부도․비- 15" 중앙일보사 : 190 ~ 191, 1983

    3 이호관, "한국 석비 양식의 변천" 국학연구 1 : 92 ~, 2002

    4 박채은, "태봉산의 태실을 찾아서" 울산 남구문화 (창간호) : 270 ~, 2002

    5 이왕직, "태봉 : 113 ~ 114" 1928

    6 강원고고학연구소, "춘천지역 조선조 태실 지표조사 보고서 : 26 ~ 27" 1997

    7 김영진, "청원 산덕리 태실 발굴조사 보고서 : 16 ~" 1997

    8 김현길, "중원군 엄정면 소재 태실비에 대하여" 예성문화 5 : 39 ~ 57, 1983

    9 전주이씨대동종약원, "조선의 태실Ⅱ" 1999

    10 심현용, "조선시대 아기태실비의 양식과 변천" 미술자료 75, 2006

    1 지성룡, "화길옹주 태실" 단양문화원 : 76 ~, 2012

    2 이호관, "한국의 미 -석등․부도․비- 15" 중앙일보사 : 190 ~ 191, 1983

    3 이호관, "한국 석비 양식의 변천" 국학연구 1 : 92 ~, 2002

    4 박채은, "태봉산의 태실을 찾아서" 울산 남구문화 (창간호) : 270 ~, 2002

    5 이왕직, "태봉 : 113 ~ 114" 1928

    6 강원고고학연구소, "춘천지역 조선조 태실 지표조사 보고서 : 26 ~ 27" 1997

    7 김영진, "청원 산덕리 태실 발굴조사 보고서 : 16 ~" 1997

    8 김현길, "중원군 엄정면 소재 태실비에 대하여" 예성문화 5 : 39 ~ 57, 1983

    9 전주이씨대동종약원, "조선의 태실Ⅱ" 1999

    10 심현용, "조선시대 아기태실비의 양식과 변천" 미술자료 75, 2006

    11 "조선보물고적조사자료" 조선총독부 : 51 ~, 1942

    12 홍성익, "원주시 대덕리 태실에 대하여" 강원문화사연구 9 : 148 ~, 2004

    13 김성찬, "원주 태실고" 원주얼 6 : 101 ~, 1996

    14 심현용, "울진지역 태실에 관한 시고" 고문화 57, 2001

    15 성림문화재연구원, "예천 명봉리 조선왕조 태실(문종․장조) 유적" 2012

    16 심현용, "성주지역 태실과 생명문화관 전시방안" 세종대왕자태실 생명문화관 컨텐츠 및 전시 방향 모색을 위한 관련 전문가 초청 학술세미나, 2010

    17 심현용, "성주 세종대왕자태실 연구" 박물관연보 2, 2005

    18 심현용, "대구 광해군태실 고" 향토문화 20 : 91 ~ 106, 2005

    19 국립문화재연구소, "군사보호구역 문화유적 지표조사 보고서(경기도편) : 356 ~" 2000

    20 "관동읍지 권2 평해군 산천" 1871

    21 홍성익, "강원지역 태실에 관한 연구" 강원문화사연구 3 : 64 ~, 1998

    22 "강원도평해군읍지" 1900

    23 강원대학교박물관, "가평군의 역사와 문화유적 : 257 ~" 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼