인공지능 행정이 행정절차･행정소송에 미치는 영향에 대한 시론적 고찰 = A Study on the Effect of Artificial Intelligence Administration on Administrative Procedures and Administrative Litigation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the situation where the use of artificial intelligence is expected to expand in the administrative field, how to secure the transparency and accountability of the artificial intelligence algorithm is important because of the unpredictability and autonomy of the artificial intelligence algorithm. To this end, administrative law responses should be considered from the standpoint of rule of law and due process, apart from ethical responses to the use of AI or special laws for AI regulation.
In the United States, various discussions have been conducted regarding AI administration in recent years, focusing on the selection of execution targets by AI and the decision related to social security benefits. With a strong emphasis on the advantages of artificial intelligence administration, and actively adopting it, the black box nature of artificial intelligence is also acceptable in light of the standards of transparency or declaration of reasons in the administrative procedure law and the court's deference in administrative litigation. It is said that the application of administrative procedures(e.g. hearing) is not required, and rules can be established through artificial intelligence. On the other hand, in terms of emphasizing the response to the black box nature of automation administration and artificial intelligence, the information about the AI ​​algorithm should be disclosed as much as possible in relation to transparency and administrative procedures should be applied regarding AI system problems. In addition, in order to strengthen the court's control over AI, It is discussed that the court should review the selection of administrative execution targets that were previously excluded from judicial review, or limit the court's deference for AI administration.
In order to secure the transparency and accountability of AI administration, the following matters need to be discussed in Korean administrative procedures and administrative litigation.
First, it is possible to consider supplementing with a separate review procedure to enhance the objectivity and fairness of the selection of investigation targets by using artificial intelligence.
Second, with regard to complaints from the Social Security Administration, the AI system for handling complaints must be designed to reflect the disposition standards and forms. In this regard, establishing the enhanced disposal standards can be an effective way to compensate for the opacity of artificial intelligence.
Third, with regard to the administrative litigation law response to AI administration, to minimize the ripple effect caused by AI system problems, it allows judicial review of AI algorithms even before specific administrative actions are performed by AI. And in order to ensure transparency in AI administration, measures to strengthen the criteria for declaration of reasons should be considered.
Finally, if the introduction of artificial intelligence increases administrative efficiency and decreases the cost of administrative procedures, this can be an incentive to reduce the exceptions of administrative procedure. By minimizing the reason for administrative procedure exceptions, focusing on secrecy, we will be able to move toward expanding the scope of administrative procedures in parallel with the expansion of AI administration.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김영조, "행정조사기본법의 문제점과 개선방안" 한국비교공법학회 8 (8): 89-122, 2007

2 안동인, "행정절차법의 처분절차상 주요 쟁점 ― 절차보장의 확대를 위한 적극적 해석의 필요성 ―" 행정법이론실무학회 (49) : 1-27, 2017

3 박재윤, "처분기준의 설정･공표와 신뢰보호" 행정법이론실무학회 (59) : 111-136, 2019

4 한국정보화진흥원, "지능형정부 구현을 위한 인공지능 활용 윤리에 관한 연구" 2018

5 행정안전부, "지능형 정부 기본계획" 2017

6 박훈민, "전자정부와 자동화된 행정결정에 대한 법도그마틱상 검토필요성 ― 독일과 네덜란드에서의 법제와 논의를 중심으로 한 시론 ―" 행정법이론실무학회 (52) : 57-77, 2018

7 행정자치부, "전자정부 2020 기본계획" 2016

8 이국현, "적법절차원리에 의해 요구되는 행정처분절차의 절차적 요건 -미국법에서의 논의와 그 시사점을 중심으로-" 한국법학원 144 : 359-389, 2014

9 윤상오, "인공지능을 활용한 정책결정의 유형과 쟁점에 관한 시론" 한국지역정보화학회 21 (21): 31-59, 2018

10 김중권, "인공지능시대에 완전자동적 행정행위에 관한 소고" 법조협회 66 (66): 146-182, 2017

11 한국행정연구원, "인공지능 기술의 행정분야 활용에 관한 탐색적 연구" 2019

12 정소윤, "인공지능 기술의 행정 활용에 관한 연구동향 및 쟁점 분석" 한국지역정보화학회 22 (22): 175-207, 2019

13 김도승, "인공지능 기반 자동행정과 법치주의" 미국헌법학회 30 (30): 105-138, 2019

14 최상옥, "인공지능 기반 공공서비스와 신공공성" (152) : 2018

15 김광수, "인공지능 규제법 서설" 한국토지공법학회 81 : 279-310, 2018

16 관계부처 합동, "인공지능 국가전략"

17 방송통신위원회, "이용자 중심의 지능정보사회를 위한 원칙"

18 이상환, "세무조사대상자 선정과 조사방법에 관한 연구" 한국세무사회 부설 한국조세연구소 8 (8): 193-240, 2019

19 황의관, "사법심사대상인 행정청 행위에 관한미국과 한국법의 비교연구" 미국헌법학회 25 (25): 547-606, 2014

20 금태환, "미국행정입법심사에 있어서의 성숙성" 행정법이론실무학회 9 : 6-232, 2003

21 김성배, "미국에서의 행정입법의 분류와 비법규적 행정규칙에 대한 통제문제" 법학연구소 28 (28): 503-542, 2016

22 김재선, "미국 행정절차법상 행정입법절차와 그 사법상 통제 – 행정입법에 대한 실질적 분류와 절차적 통제 논의를 중심으로 -" (17) : 2019

23 박균성, "미국 행정입법제도의 시사점 - 사법적 통제를 중심으로 -" 행정법이론실무학회 (46) : 75-103, 2016

24 경건, "미국 정보공개법제의 개관" 15 (15): 2007

25 이재훈, "독일 연방절차법상 전자동화 행정행위 도입 및 주요 쟁점" (16) : 2019

26 이상길, "국내외 AI 활용 현황과 공공 적용" 2018

27 김길수, "공공부문에서 인공지능 활용에 관한 연구" 한국자치행정학회 33 (33): 27-47, 2019

28 최계영, "거부처분의 사전통지― 법치행정과 행정의 효율성의 조화 ―" 행정법이론실무학회 18 : 279-307, 2007

29 Cary Coglianese, "Transparency and Algorithmic Governance" 71 : 1-, 2019

30 Ashley Deeks, "The Judicial Demand for Explainable Artificial Intelligence" 119 : 1829-, 2019

31 Danielle Keats Citron, "Technological Due Process" 85 : 1249-, 2008

32 Cary Coglianese, "Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era" 105 : 1147-, 2017

33 David Freeman Engstrom, "Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies" THE ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES 2020

34 김재완, "EU 일반정보보호규정(GDPR)의 알고리즘 자동화 의사결정에 대한 통제로써 설명을 요구할 권리에 대한 쟁점 분석과 전망" 민주주의법학연구회 (69) : 277-298, 2019

35 Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, "Cyberdelegation and the Administrative State" 2016

36 David Freeman Engstrom, "Algorithmic Accountability in the Administrative State" CSAS 2019

37 Joshua A. Kroll, "Accountable Algorithms" 165 : 633-, 2017

38 Cary Coglianese, "AI in Adjudication and Administration. Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 2118"

39 Aziz Z. Huq, "A Right to a Human Decision" 105 : 2019

40 행정안전부, "4차 산업혁명 시대, 국민과 함께 지능형 정부로"