RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    1,2차 북핵위기와 한반도,동북아 질서 변화 = North Korean Nuclear Crises and Structural Changes of the International Order in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Two things are worth noticing from the first and second North Korean nuclear crises: negotiation strategies of North Korea and the United States faced with traditional security conflicts; structural changes of the international order in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia. This paper gives more attention to the latter than the former. Since the end of the Cold War, the balance of power in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia turned unfavorable to North Korea. In the beginning this situation was managed by diplomatic measures, but South Korea and the U.S. took a hard line towards North Korea in the second half of 1992. March 1993 the first nuclear crisis was broken out. October 1994 North Korea and the U.S. signed the Agreed Framework, which was not to resolve entirely the crisis because of negative influences of the domestic circumstances of both North Korea and the U.S. The sunshine policy of South Korea and the inter-Korean summit in June 2000 opened a door towards the peace and unification in the Korean Peninsula. October 2004 the second nuclear crisis was, however, provoked by the hawkish policy of the Bush administration and tension was built up by North Korean and US hard-line policies. South Korea and China, whose position in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia was beginning to be strengthened from the end of the 1990th, succeeded in persuading North Korea and the US to agree upon a peaceful resolution of crisis.
    번역하기

    Two things are worth noticing from the first and second North Korean nuclear crises: negotiation strategies of North Korea and the United States faced with traditional security conflicts; structural changes of the international order in the Korean Pen...

    Two things are worth noticing from the first and second North Korean nuclear crises: negotiation strategies of North Korea and the United States faced with traditional security conflicts; structural changes of the international order in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia. This paper gives more attention to the latter than the former. Since the end of the Cold War, the balance of power in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia turned unfavorable to North Korea. In the beginning this situation was managed by diplomatic measures, but South Korea and the U.S. took a hard line towards North Korea in the second half of 1992. March 1993 the first nuclear crisis was broken out. October 1994 North Korea and the U.S. signed the Agreed Framework, which was not to resolve entirely the crisis because of negative influences of the domestic circumstances of both North Korea and the U.S. The sunshine policy of South Korea and the inter-Korean summit in June 2000 opened a door towards the peace and unification in the Korean Peninsula. October 2004 the second nuclear crisis was, however, provoked by the hawkish policy of the Bush administration and tension was built up by North Korean and US hard-line policies. South Korea and China, whose position in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia was beginning to be strengthened from the end of the 1990th, succeeded in persuading North Korea and the US to agree upon a peaceful resolution of crisis.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼