RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개정 국제감사기준의 도입을 위한 감사인 책임제도의 보완 필요성에 관한 고찰 - 주요감사사항(KAM)을 중심으로 - = Implementation of New International Standard on Audit (Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report) and Auditors Liability Scheme

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101613479

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) reported an operating loss of 3 trillion won, shifting from an operating profit of 183 billion won a year earlier. This incident has triggered a debate on the appropriateness of company audits.
    The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) introduced the New and Revised Auditor’s Reporting Standards on March 2015 in order to enhance auditor reporting. Enhancing auditor reporting is viewed as critical to the perceived value of the financial statement audit and thus to the continued relevance of the auditing profession. IAASB explains that the new and revised Auditor Reporting Standards lay the foundation for the future of global auditor reporting and improved auditor communications.
    Among the new and revised Auditor Reporting Standards, the International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 701 deals with the auditor’s responsibility to communicate key audit matters (KAM) in the auditor’s report. The purpose of communicating KMA is to enhance the communicative value of the auditor’s report by providing greater transparency about the audit that was performed.
    Even though the main aim of KAM is providing greater transparency, it may cause the ambiguity of the nature and scope of the auditors’ legal responsibilities with respect to KAM. This article analyses the IAASB’s New and Revised Auditor Reporting Standards, expecially reporting KAM, and the legal liability concerns for auditors. This article argues that Korea needs to supplement the legal liabilities system of auditors especially to the third party that is inadequate before the implementation of the new ISA 701. First, the practical guidelines of the ISA 701 should be in detail for preventing ambiguity of criteria of duty of care. Second, The concept and the scope of those charged with governance should be clarified in the Korean legal system in order that the auditors can communicate the right institution for deciding KAM during auditing. Third, concerning the sensitive matters the auditors should not be liable because of the confidentiality obligation.
    번역하기

    Recently Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) reported an operating loss of 3 trillion won, shifting from an operating profit of 183 billion won a year earlier. This incident has triggered a debate on the appropriateness of company audits. ...

    Recently Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) reported an operating loss of 3 trillion won, shifting from an operating profit of 183 billion won a year earlier. This incident has triggered a debate on the appropriateness of company audits.
    The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) introduced the New and Revised Auditor’s Reporting Standards on March 2015 in order to enhance auditor reporting. Enhancing auditor reporting is viewed as critical to the perceived value of the financial statement audit and thus to the continued relevance of the auditing profession. IAASB explains that the new and revised Auditor Reporting Standards lay the foundation for the future of global auditor reporting and improved auditor communications.
    Among the new and revised Auditor Reporting Standards, the International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 701 deals with the auditor’s responsibility to communicate key audit matters (KAM) in the auditor’s report. The purpose of communicating KMA is to enhance the communicative value of the auditor’s report by providing greater transparency about the audit that was performed.
    Even though the main aim of KAM is providing greater transparency, it may cause the ambiguity of the nature and scope of the auditors’ legal responsibilities with respect to KAM. This article analyses the IAASB’s New and Revised Auditor Reporting Standards, expecially reporting KAM, and the legal liability concerns for auditors. This article argues that Korea needs to supplement the legal liabilities system of auditors especially to the third party that is inadequate before the implementation of the new ISA 701. First, the practical guidelines of the ISA 701 should be in detail for preventing ambiguity of criteria of duty of care. Second, The concept and the scope of those charged with governance should be clarified in the Korean legal system in order that the auditors can communicate the right institution for deciding KAM during auditing. Third, concerning the sensitive matters the auditors should not be liable because of the confidentiality obligation.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최문희, "회계감사인의 비례책임제도의 쟁점과 바람직한 운용방안 - 개정 외감법에 대한 비판적 고찰과 개선과제를 중심으로 -" 한국법학원 144 : 240-287, 2014

    2 권재열, "회계감사인의 법적 책임" 5 (5): 1998

    3 한국공인회계사회, "토론회 수주산업의 회계투명성 이대로 좋은가"

    4 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법 주석서 I" 2015

    5 이재은, "감사판단의 사후평가시 기대차이, 직무책임 및 사후편견의 영향" 한국회계학회 23 (23): 1-36, 2014

    6 Price waterhouse Coopers, "Re: PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034, Proposed Auditing Standards - The Auditor’s Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion; The Auditor’s Responsibilities Regarding Other Information in Certain Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements and the Related Auditor’s Report; and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards"

    7 Deloitte & Touche LLP, "Re: PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034"

    8 KPMG, "New and Revised Auditor Reporting Standards: Auditor reporting implementation guidance"

    9 노준화, "NEW ISA 회계감사" 2015

    10 Epstein, Barry Jay, "Implications of PCAOB’s Proposed Changes To Auditors’ Reports" 19 (19): 2013

    1 최문희, "회계감사인의 비례책임제도의 쟁점과 바람직한 운용방안 - 개정 외감법에 대한 비판적 고찰과 개선과제를 중심으로 -" 한국법학원 144 : 240-287, 2014

    2 권재열, "회계감사인의 법적 책임" 5 (5): 1998

    3 한국공인회계사회, "토론회 수주산업의 회계투명성 이대로 좋은가"

    4 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법 주석서 I" 2015

    5 이재은, "감사판단의 사후평가시 기대차이, 직무책임 및 사후편견의 영향" 한국회계학회 23 (23): 1-36, 2014

    6 Price waterhouse Coopers, "Re: PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034, Proposed Auditing Standards - The Auditor’s Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion; The Auditor’s Responsibilities Regarding Other Information in Certain Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements and the Related Auditor’s Report; and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards"

    7 Deloitte & Touche LLP, "Re: PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034"

    8 KPMG, "New and Revised Auditor Reporting Standards: Auditor reporting implementation guidance"

    9 노준화, "NEW ISA 회계감사" 2015

    10 Epstein, Barry Jay, "Implications of PCAOB’s Proposed Changes To Auditors’ Reports" 19 (19): 2013

    11 Financial Reporting Council, "Extended auditor’s reports: A review of experience in the first year, The Survey of Experience in the First Year" 2015

    12 Australian Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, "Exposure Draft: Reporting on Audited Financial Reports – New and Revised Auditor Reporting Standards and Related Conforming Amendments, Explanatory Memorandum" 2015

    13 International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, "Enhancing the Value of Auditor Reporting: Exploring Options for Change, Consultation Paper" 2011

    14 Palmiter, A.R., "Corporations" 2015

    15 Mayson, S. W., "Company Law" 2014

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-05-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSOCIATION KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 상사법연구
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1 1 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.96 0.93 0.979 0.58
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼