Background: Despite the construction industry’s large share in the national economy, it exhibits a high rate of industrial accidents, with a continued rise in occupational respiratory diseases such as pneumoconiosis. Although Air-Purifying Respirato...
Background: Despite the construction industry’s large share in the national economy, it exhibits a high rate of industrial accidents, with a continued rise in occupational respiratory diseases such as pneumoconiosis. Although Air-Purifying Respirators are essential for worker protection, discomfort often leads to low compliance on-site. Methods: This study aims to propose design directions for AirPurifying Respirators that enhance usability based on user experience. To achieve this, it combined a literature review, analysis of FFRs design cases, and qualitative research through in-depth interviews and field observations with construction workers. Results: Based on this, design directions were derived to address key discomfort factors, including local pressure from head straps, moisture accumulation and condensation inside the mask, posturerelated pressure or poor fit of the nose clip, visual obstruction from the protruding front, and psychological aversion to functional materials. Conclusion: Design improvements are proposed to reduce localized pressure, enhance moisture absorption, relieve pressure and improve fit with a better nose sponge, improve visibility, and reduce odor discomfort. The study identifies overlooked barriers to mask use and offers user-centered insights for developing more acceptable FFRs in construction settings.