한국형 사전의료의향서의 구성 요건: 의료인을 중심으로 = Prerequisite for Korean Advance Directives: From the View of Healthcare Providers

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the main prerequisite for Korean Advance Directives [KAD] to ensure their better use. Methods: Data were collected from two focus group interviews and individual email responses. Study participants were 5 doctors and 6 nurses. All interview data were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results:Three main themes emerged; establishing a philosophy of KAD, protocol to practice KAD, and the KAD document itself. A philosophy is needed to ensure individual needs, consensus to practice AD and identify principle agents. The core of protocol was found to be as follows; 1) process, 2) premise, 3) procedure, 4) contextual preparation, 5) timing, 6) feasibility. Component and feasibility need to be established for the document itself. Conclusion: For a positive acceptance of KAD in Korean society,a culture sensitive, reality based, and user friendly AD needs to be developed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 허대석, "환자의 자기결정권과 사전의료지시서" 대한의사협회 52 (52): 865-870, 2009

2 이경식, "품위 있는 죽음과 호스피스 완화의료에 대한 일반 국민들의 태도" 한국호스피스완화의료학회 7 (7): 17-28, 2004

3 권복규, "우리나라 일부 병원에서 환자, 보호자, 의료진의 연명치료 중지 관련 의사결정에 관한 태도" 한국의료윤리학회 13 (13): 1-16, 2010

4 박형욱, "세브란스병원 사건의 경과와 의의" 대한의사협회 52 (52): 848-855, 2009

5 김신미, "사전의사결정(Advance Directives)의 속성-대리인 지정을 중심으로" 한국의료윤리학회 13 (13): 29-42, 2010

6 김신미, "노인과 성인이 인식하는 ‘좋은 죽음’에 대한 연구" 한국노년학회 23 (23): 95-110, 2003

7 Kirschner, K. L., "When written advance directives are not enough" 21 : 193-209, 2005

8 Levi, B. H., "Too soon to give up: Re-examining the value of advance directives" 10 (10): 3-22, 2010

9 Hsieh, H., "Three approaches to qualitative content analysis" 15 : 1277-1288, 2005

10 Kim, S. Y., "The right for natural death at the end-of-life bill"

11 Sandelowski, M., "The problem of rigor in qualitative research" 8 (8): 27-37, 1986

12 Lo, B., "Resuscitating advance directives" 164 (164): 1501-1506, 2004

13 Ministry of Health & Welfare, "Press release: Consensus report on withdrawing life-sustaining-treatment of a consultative body for social consensus"

14 Seymour, J., "Planning for the end of life: The views of older people about advance care statements" 59 : 57-68, 2004

15 Haisfield, M. E., "Patients' and healthcare providers' opinions regarding advance directives" 21 : 1179-1187, 1994

16 Koch, K. A., "Patient self-determination act" 79 : 240-243, 1992

17 Kim, K. W., "National movement to complete advance directives-Starts as civil movement"

18 Steinhauser, K. E., "Factors considered important at the end of life bypatients, family, physicians, and other care providers" 284 : 2476-2482, 2000

19 Fagerlin, A., "Enough. The failure of the living will" 34 (34): 30-42, 2004

20 Shin, S. J., "Dying with dignity law"

21 김지은, "Discrepancies among patients, family members, and physicians in Korea in terms of values regarding the withholding of treatment from patients with terminal malignancies" JOHN WILEY & SONS INC 100 : 1961-1966, 200405

22 Rao, J. K., "Development of public health priorities for end-of-life initiatives" 29 : 453-460, 2005

23 Statistics Korea, "Death for 19 chapters of causes by place of de"

24 Ramsaroop, S. D., "Completing an advance directive in the primary care setting: What do we need for success?" 55 : 277-283, 2007

25 Hahn, M. E., "Advance directives and patient physician communication" 289 : 96-, 2003

26 Sabatino, C. P., "Advance directives and advance care planning: Legal and policy issues" U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2007

27 Prendergast, T. J., "Advance care planning: Pitfalls, progress, promise" 29 (29): N34-N39, 2001

28 Supreme Court, "A sentence 2009 Da 17417 court’s ruling from the full panel of judges [Withdrawal of meaningless lifesustaining- treatment] [Kong 2009 Sang, 849]"

29 Supreme Court, "A sentence 2002 Do 995 [Murder (ruling: aiding murder), murder] [Kong 2004.8.1.(207), 1255]"