RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    산지전용허가 표고기준 개선방안에 관한 연구 -산지관리법과 국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률을 중심으로 = The Improvements for the Altitude Criteria related to the Adaptive Reuse Permission on Mountains District -with special emphasis on Management of Mountains District Act and National Land Planning and Utilization Act

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99649602

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The altitude criteria of ``Management of Mountains District Act`` and ``National Land Planning and Utilization Act`` are different because the adaptive reuse permissions on mountains district by two acts have been operated individually and each criteria has some problems for application. This study aims to suggest proposals for improvements of altitude criteria by two acts. The altitude criteria of the duel legal systems were researched by literature review and inherent issues were derived by interview with public officers and GIS tools applied to cases. The results are as follows : First, duel criteria systems need to be integrated based on the format by ``Management of Mountains District Act``. Second, the criteria index(50/100) by ``Management of Mountains District Act`` need to be adjusted due to the preserved area ratio in mountains district and the each definition of ``the peak point of the mountain`` and ``the tail of the mountain`` can be changed as ``the highest point within the same slope(including ridge)`` and as ``the average of the highest and the lowest point on boundary between the mountain district and the other land use district``. Third, the method of slope division may be determined by the conditions of local areas and the discrepancy between the two slopes in common boundaries must be adjusted. Finally, the maps containing preservation areas and development areas need to be notified.
    번역하기

    The altitude criteria of ``Management of Mountains District Act`` and ``National Land Planning and Utilization Act`` are different because the adaptive reuse permissions on mountains district by two acts have been operated individually and each criter...

    The altitude criteria of ``Management of Mountains District Act`` and ``National Land Planning and Utilization Act`` are different because the adaptive reuse permissions on mountains district by two acts have been operated individually and each criteria has some problems for application. This study aims to suggest proposals for improvements of altitude criteria by two acts. The altitude criteria of the duel legal systems were researched by literature review and inherent issues were derived by interview with public officers and GIS tools applied to cases. The results are as follows : First, duel criteria systems need to be integrated based on the format by ``Management of Mountains District Act``. Second, the criteria index(50/100) by ``Management of Mountains District Act`` need to be adjusted due to the preserved area ratio in mountains district and the each definition of ``the peak point of the mountain`` and ``the tail of the mountain`` can be changed as ``the highest point within the same slope(including ridge)`` and as ``the average of the highest and the lowest point on boundary between the mountain district and the other land use district``. Third, the method of slope division may be determined by the conditions of local areas and the discrepancy between the two slopes in common boundaries must be adjusted. Finally, the maps containing preservation areas and development areas need to be notified.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼