RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    Centralized Regulatory Review in the United States : Past Practice and New Developments

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107180176

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Studies have shown that economies governed by regulation that is clear, consistent, and respectful of property rights are more successful economically than economies that face heavy regulation. Less regulated economies enjoy greater labor productivity and employment, less corruption, and fewer incentives for individuals to operate in an informal or underground economy.To sum up, I would like to offer a number of conclusions. First, the U.S. experience indicates that a firm and enduring commitment from the center of government is a necessary condition for a successful regulatory program. This is particularly true when regulatory reform imposes short term costs before greater long term benefits materialize. Second, an affective regulatory program should ensure that economic analysis is conducted to promote economic efficiency. Economic efficiency implies market-based and pro-competition reforms that arenondiscriminatory. Third, accountability is required because special interests are especially powerful in regulatory matters. Finally, transparency and openness are required to maintain long term support for the program.
    번역하기

    Studies have shown that economies governed by regulation that is clear, consistent, and respectful of property rights are more successful economically than economies that face heavy regulation. Less regulated economies enjoy greater labor productivity...

    Studies have shown that economies governed by regulation that is clear, consistent, and respectful of property rights are more successful economically than economies that face heavy regulation. Less regulated economies enjoy greater labor productivity and employment, less corruption, and fewer incentives for individuals to operate in an informal or underground economy.To sum up, I would like to offer a number of conclusions. First, the U.S. experience indicates that a firm and enduring commitment from the center of government is a necessary condition for a successful regulatory program. This is particularly true when regulatory reform imposes short term costs before greater long term benefits materialize. Second, an affective regulatory program should ensure that economic analysis is conducted to promote economic efficiency. Economic efficiency implies market-based and pro-competition reforms that arenondiscriminatory. Third, accountability is required because special interests are especially powerful in regulatory matters. Finally, transparency and openness are required to maintain long term support for the program.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. Centralized Management and LeadershipⅡ. Regulatory Impact AnalysisⅢ. Transparency and AccountabilityⅣ. New DevelopmentsⅤ. Conclusions
    • Ⅰ. Centralized Management and LeadershipⅡ. Regulatory Impact AnalysisⅢ. Transparency and AccountabilityⅣ. New DevelopmentsⅤ. Conclusions
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼